Republican nominee for President

[Hog1]

.....lol

[Hog1]

Old News?
Translation: ongoing investigation involving 100 FBI agents? Probably nothing.......

And.....it damn sure is trashy. There are woman coming out of the woodwork naming...Good ol' Bill for assaulting them and apparently Good ol' Hill has been covering it for him for lo' these.......many years
Not exactly a recipe for CIC.....



Fox News is told that about 100 special agents assigned to the investigations also were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, with as many as 50 additional agents on “temporary duty assignment,” or TDY. The request to sign a new NDA could reflect that agents are handling the highly classified material in the emails, or serve as a reminder not to leak about the case, or both.

"The pressure on the lead agents is brutal," a second source said. "Think of it like a military operation, you might need tanks called in along with infantry."

Separately, a former high-ranking State Department official emphasized to Fox News that Clinton’s deliberate non-use of her government email address may be increasingly “significant.”

“It is virtually automatic when one comes on board at the State Department to be assigned an email address,” the source said.

“It would have taken an affirmative act not to have one assigned ... and it would also mean it was all planned out before she took office. This certainly raises questions about the so-called legal advice she claimed to have received from inside the State Department that what she was doing was proper."

[That Guy]

you're basically equating agents investigating her with proof of guilt.

there very well be some shady sh*t going on there, but until the investigation release the results, it's just premature speculation. of course fox news blowhards are going to blow hard. it's all they know how to do.

[Hog1]

If you had over 100 FBI agents investigating you, would you have reason to worry? Would it be unreasonable to assume 100+ FUCKIN FBI AGENTS is reason for serious concern? lol
AND did Fox somehow distort the report? Did they lie? If not for what possible purpose do you bring it up? Is that a defense of some sort in your mind?

[That Guy]

did i say it wasn't reason for concern? did i say fox lied? did i say that was some sort of defense?

once we see the results we'll know the scope. why is my refusal to assume absolute guilt before seeing the actual facts such a problem for you that you feel the need to respond emotionally?

[Hog1]

You....assume a lot. And if you think the FBI would waste that type of manpower on innocence, well that makes you something else as well.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by Hog1

You....assume a lot. And if you think the FBI would waste that type of manpower on innocence, well that makes you something else as well.

Why not? They have a responsibility to get it right no matter guilt or innocence. The number of agents has nothing to do with it. It has more to do with being damn sure they get their report correct due to who they are investigating.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Why not? They have a responsibility to get it right no matter guilt or innocence. The number of agents has nothing to do with it. It has more to do with being damn sure they get their report correct due to who they are investigating.

How are things in Oz?

[That Guy]

You....assume a lot.

pot, kettle, black.

if i accuse you of murder, you're obviously guilty right? talk about a rush to judgement. all i said is i'll wait to see the extent of what they find before wildly speculating on speculation. that means i must be a communist, right?

[Hog1]

i'm pretty sure at this point you can hold both sides of the issue by yourself......without interference

[MTK]

Can't make this stuff up

Donald Trump: I could 'shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters' - CNNPolitics.com

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by MTK

Can't make this stuff up

Donald Trump: I could 'shoot somebody and I wouldn't lose voters' - CNNPolitics.com

I don't think Political Correctness holds much....sway for him
Thank God.....

[MTK]

On a lighter note

Tina Fey’s Sarah Palin Returned to ‘SNL’ to Endorse Trump, and It Was Glorious - The Daily Beast

[kct1975]

Originally Posted by MTK

On a lighter note

Tina Fey’s Sarah Palin Returned to ‘SNL’ to Endorse Trump, and It Was Glorious - The Daily Beast

Tina Fey is Awesome!

[Chico23231]

Trump and Fox at war: Neither side is backing down - Jan. 27, 2016

Seeing the true colors. How can you call yourself a leader if you let things like this bother you?