|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-12-2010, 12:15 PM | #46 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 920
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Kind of sad & ironic that the justification of signing Furrey was that we need extra bodies because our OLD WR's are banged up.. Well, guess what -- we needed extra bodies because we cut Marko Mitchell 2 months ago. Furrey is 33yrs and has NO chance of making the team. Both M.Kelly & D.Thomas had better stats than Furrey last year, and Furrey had more than 600yds only once in 2006. Even TO has a higher chance with us.
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
06-12-2010, 06:23 PM | #47 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Quote:
We're not hearing rave reviews out of Redskins park about Kelly or Thomas. I think unless one of them convinces the Shanahan's he can be a #1 possession WR we get TO. The media will love this btw.
__________________
24-34 |
|
06-12-2010, 08:22 PM | #48 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Quote:
|
|
06-14-2010, 01:32 PM | #49 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,372
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Quote:
|
|
06-15-2010, 02:26 PM | #50 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Why do people think that Furrey won't make the 53 man roster? He is a great special teams player, can also play defense, and is a great fourth/fifth WR.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
06-15-2010, 03:28 PM | #51 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 51
Posts: 99,448
|
He very well could. He's definitely going to have the chance to compete.
|
06-15-2010, 11:58 PM | #52 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Yep, he's like James Thrash but better at receiver. He can do the returns and everything.. even played some DB
|
06-16-2010, 12:20 AM | #53 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Quote:
I mean, aside from cutting more deserving players (and who knows), which "underachiever" are we cutting to make room for the scrawny, overacheiving, 'teams ace? Your argument that he might make it on merit is admirable, but then, it causes you to identify and cut bait with someone less deserving.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
06-16-2010, 12:44 AM | #54 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
What if we keep 6?
|
06-16-2010, 01:49 AM | #55 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
Well, whether we keep six or keep five and go Moss/Kelly/Thomas/Furrey/Austin, Furrey doesn't fit anywhere in either case.
It can be argued that he can add value as a receiver, as well as a special teamer, but unless you can back that statement with a way that he can actually play on this team:
It seems nonsensical to suggest that a guy can contribute as a WR, and then keep a bunch of guys ahead of him that haven't contributed, but even so, are expected to contribute more in the future than said guy. I maintain that unless you think a guy offers more present (and future) value to the offense than either Thomas or Kelly, he doesn't deserve his roster spot. But if one thinks he can actually beat out someone for a spot on the real gameday offense, that's a much more substantial debate, IMO. Thinking that Furrey is better than Kelly or Thomas (and will be in the future) makes a statement about Furrey as a player. Saying that he could earn a spot on the team, over other more qualified players, without beating anyone out just seems to miss the point of competition.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
06-16-2010, 01:53 AM | #56 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Sean and Furrey
The short version of the above: a 4th receiver, on this team, is useless. Either we find a 3rd receiver who outplays one of Moss/Kelly/Thomas, or our fourth receiver is really another special teamer: Banks/Armstrong/Hodge, or someone.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|