Redskin.com Poll Question Changed

CRT3 · 03-04-2005, 02:28 PM

They took off Resign Smoot and Pierce. Well we know they missed on Pierce but is this a sign that Fred is defiently out?

Concerning free agency, which do you prefer?

Big splash with high-profile signings

Moderate signings that fill needs

Bypass free agency, build via draft

Other answer

diehardskin2982 · 03-04-2005, 02:32 PM

Moderate signings that fill needs

Find gems at good prices, not high priced turds

FRPLG · 03-04-2005, 02:35 PM

I prefer a combo of the three. In FA fill needs with high value signings like this years' signing of Patten. This saves some cap room to make the occassional big splash move but only when we're talking about a younger guy with upside at a reasonable price like last year with Washington. Preferably all holes are adequately filled before the draft that way we can take the best available player regardless of position.

CRT3 · 03-04-2005, 04:47 PM

No the real statement here is that they took off Smoot and Pierce from the possible answers. Does that seem like a indication that Fred is gone?

MTK · 03-04-2005, 04:49 PM

I wouldn't look too far into it.

Some people think if a player's jersey goes on sale at skins.com it means he's gone, Samuels was on sale a few days ago, not sure if it still is but as we all know he re-signed.

monk81 · 03-04-2005, 06:33 PM

I also think you need to use BOTH free agency AND the draft. But we can't overpay for the free agents either........sign me some blue collar guys.....that ask for a reasonable market value...........

AndySkinUK · 03-04-2005, 06:55 PM

Sign 1 big price FA, get a couple of role guys to do a job (Rabach and Patten), and then draft a stud (Williams or Pollack) would be the way id do it.

All we need then is the stud FA which hopefully will be Smoot.

03-04-2005, 02:28 PM	#1
CRT3 Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Rockville Age: 61 Posts: 795	Redskin.com Poll Question Changed They took off Resign Smoot and Pierce. Well we know they missed on Pierce but is this a sign that Fred is defiently out? Concerning free agency, which do you prefer? Big splash with high-profile signings Moderate signings that fill needs Bypass free agency, build via draft Other answer __________________ 16-0 for 2007

03-04-2005, 02:32 PM	#2
diehardskin2982 Another Year, another mess. Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,581	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed Moderate signings that fill needs Find gems at good prices, not high priced turds __________________ That got ugly fast

03-04-2005, 02:35 PM	#3
FRPLG MVP Join Date: May 2004 Age: 45 Posts: 10,164	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed I prefer a combo of the three. In FA fill needs with high value signings like this years' signing of Patten. This saves some cap room to make the occassional big splash move but only when we're talking about a younger guy with upside at a reasonable price like last year with Washington. Preferably all holes are adequately filled before the draft that way we can take the best available player regardless of position.

03-04-2005, 04:47 PM	#4
CRT3 Impact Rookie Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Rockville Age: 61 Posts: 795	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed No the real statement here is that they took off Smoot and Pierce from the possible answers. Does that seem like a indication that Fred is gone? __________________ 16-0 for 2007

03-04-2005, 04:49 PM	#5
MTK \m/ Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: NY Age: 51 Posts: 99,427	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed I wouldn't look too far into it. Some people think if a player's jersey goes on sale at skins.com it means he's gone, Samuels was on sale a few days ago, not sure if it still is but as we all know he re-signed. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-04-2005, 06:33 PM	#6
monk81 The Starter Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: TEXAS Posts: 2,029	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed I also think you need to use BOTH free agency AND the draft. But we can't overpay for the free agents either........sign me some blue collar guys.....that ask for a reasonable market value........... __________________ "It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW

03-04-2005, 06:55 PM	#7
AndySkinUK Camp Scrub Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Leeds, England Age: 50 Posts: 44	Re: Redskin.com Poll Question Changed Sign 1 big price FA, get a couple of role guys to do a job (Rabach and Patten), and then draft a stud (Williams or Pollack) would be the way id do it. All we need then is the stud FA which hopefully will be Smoot. __________________ Don't Panic

Redskin.com Poll Question Changed

Locker Room Main Forum