|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-19-2006, 05:45 PM
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
... in his latest MMQB. The Redskins grade out as a C-, and I think he may have been kind.
2001 brought us such luminaries as Rod "50/50" Gardner, Sage Rosenfelz, and Fred Smoot. The only player who was at all valuable was Fred, and he has never been a #1 CB after 5 years in the league. Peter King and I agree on little. I don't care for Starbucks, and I like Art Monk. But I'm afraid he's right on this one.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
06-19-2006, 05:53 PM
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bowie, MD
Age: 37
Posts: 423
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
It's about 5 years late to really care about how the Skins did in the 2001 draft. Not to bash you but it's just kinda outdated.
|
|
|
|
|
06-19-2006, 06:11 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 3,494
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Quote:
I tend to agree with King assertion that drafts shouldn't be graded until the players actually perform - it's one of the reasons I think Eagles fans are especially delusional this year (Did you see who we got in the draft? We're back, baby!). And, since I've been a fan of the Redskins for a little while now, I remember the days when we all hoped Rod Gardner would turn the corner, and I'm glad they're past.
__________________
There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-19-2006, 06:15 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Quote:
By the same token, you can't rate the 2006 draft by those standards either, because none of the 2006 draftees have played in the NFL yet. You can rate them based on what their status is coming out of college. But to get an accurate gauge on how well this draft class will do, you'd have to wait at least until 2009 or later. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-19-2006, 07:07 PM
|
#5 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
that draft sucked for the redskins, plain and simple. gardener is out of the league and smooty isnt that far behind
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
06-19-2006, 07:29 PM
|
#6 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
peter king can suck my nuts...he is terrible like the rest
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
06-19-2006, 07:57 PM
|
#7 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
I agree with Cinnci and Carolina being the only A's given, but there were some grades that didn't make much sense. King is great at trashing a team and then turning around and saying that they are going to win it all.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 11:38 AM
|
#8 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,363
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
well even thought I also didn't agreed with some of his grades I totally agreed with the grade he gaved dallas I think it should had been lower that was one of the worst drafts ever didn't like it then sure don't like it now....
I also agree the best way to grade a draft it's 3-5 years later after the players perform because right now they're are just names and assumptions, right now NO looks like one of the teams that did the best draft by selecting Bush but if he turns in to a L.Phillips not so good draft after all. |
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 01:30 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 01:39 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,001
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 03:33 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Quote:
Champ McAlister Clements Winfield Law Surtain Barber Rolle Harris Sheppard Bly Madison Springs Vasher Robinson Lucas Mathis Hall Baxter Newman Taylor so that'd make him about 22. Even if you diagree with some of the names, tossing 12 to bump his name up would be pretty hard to do. |
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 03:37 PM
|
#12 |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,544
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
Smoot has never been a top 10 corner. Top 20, maybe... but like Schneed said above he wasn't even a top 2 guy on the Vikes last year.
To be a top 10 corner, you have to be a #1 on your own team. Smoot has never been the #1 corner. |
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:12 PM
|
#13 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
smoot was a good, solid corner while here, but.... after getting torched by steve smith, getting hurt, and then only playing the nickel for the vikes, i think the writings on the wall.
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:13 PM
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
and i am not a typical redskin fan. i hold no grudges just because someone left for more money. there isnt one person on this board that wouldnt do the same
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
06-20-2006, 05:13 PM
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 32
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Peter King grades the 2001 draft...
i have a feeling that the vikings were the beginning of the end for him. if he would have stayed, i bet he would have been worlds better than he is now.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
