|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-16-2006, 10:24 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
|
Draft, FAs, etc
While I certainly was not happy about the loss to Seattle, given the fact we got Alexander out and still lost, I must say that it was a good year and kudos to the coaching staff. Now, lets turn to our needs.
The Draft. I might be the only one that thinks this way, but here goes. I devote the entire draft to the offensive and defensive lines. Our o-line backups, i.e. Cory Raymer, are horrible. We really really need to upgrade our backups on the o-line and get some depth. We also need to upgrade the D-line as well. When Griffin was out, our defense really suffered. We need someone who can play in the middle of that line and stuff the run. Id be happy if we used all of our picks on lineman. Free Agency: No. 2 receiver. I know alot of you will say Patten still has football in him, maybe he does. Maybe Patten would get open, and Brunell just couldn't get him the ball. Often when I watch the game again on TiVo, I will see the receivers being open way way before Brunnell gets them the ball, so maybe Patten was getting open and Brunnell just doesn't have the arm to get the ball there fast enough. Irregardless, FRAYGEELAY (aka Jacobs) is gone and we need to upgrade the WR corp (AGAIN). I think we have 2 glaring needs in free agency: Upgrade WRs, and sign a pass rushing DE. Thoughts? |
Advertisements |
01-16-2006, 10:30 AM | #2 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
WR and DE is correct, its a must, and DE has been a glaring need for almost a damn decade now.
DE and OL in draft and WR though FA |
01-16-2006, 10:33 AM | #3 |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Agreed, Great year, I take that back............INCREDIBLE year! Need to look at the O-line as, to many times, we could NOT run the ball. Not enough push. It didn't look like Portis problem. If it's going to be the mainstay of our offense, we better be able to execute it against everyone.
Need WR help. It looks to me more of a problem with people to throw to, rather than Brunell not seeing them. I would say he fails to hit recievers "in stride" to much. D-line needs competant backups and a fire breathin' pass rusher. Need another good corner (in a perfect world). This would be a nice start HAIL TO THE REDSKINS
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
01-16-2006, 10:38 AM | #4 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2006, 10:41 AM | #5 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
Still, while I don't think DE is a glaring need, it would be nice to get someone young in here to develop. Daniels and Wynn aren't exactly spring chickens. I did like what I saw from Evans at times, perhaps he could get worked into the mix more next year. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:44 AM | #6 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2006, 10:46 AM | #7 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
But having Daniels, Wynn, and assuming we resign D Evans, I think that allows us to focus on other problems with our higher picks. I'd love a free agent WR and our offensive line depth is downright scary. Plus, only Rabach and Dockery can be considered young. Jansen, Samuels and Thomas are in the midst of their primes and it won't be too much longer before we need younger legs. Developing some depth along the line would be good, and hopefully they'd eventually grow into a starting role. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:47 AM | #8 |
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2004
Location: philippines
Age: 51
Posts: 184
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
yeah,
oline, wr is a priority de is second priority look, after thomas was injured our offense (esp running game) suffered it is very clear |
01-16-2006, 10:49 AM | #9 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
The team will have a decent amount of cap room, but I think it would be a mistake to go spend big money at DE when we have other problems at other positions. Adding a DE can never hurt, but it wouldn't be my first priority. Salary cap constraints dictate that we look at other positions first, IMO. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:49 AM | #10 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
I don't think there's any doubt about it -- we desperately need to address defensive end. Renaldo Wynn simply isn't a pass rusher. While Philip Daniels finally found his light switch, saying that all is well at that position would be a huge mistake.
It's all going to depend on who the best player is when our pick comes up in the 2nd round. DE, reserve O-linemen, WR and nickel CB are the priorities in my mind. |
01-16-2006, 10:50 AM | #11 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas
Age: 43
Posts: 461
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
|
|
01-16-2006, 10:55 AM | #12 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
Ray Brown was a fine stopgap in pass protection. And he could run block in the interior a little bit. But he couldn't get out into space. Dockery couldn't do it going the other way, either. We missed Randy desperately. What's worse, we don't have Ray Brown next year, even as a stopgap to provide pass protection and mediocre run-blocking. We have Molinaro, who is totally unknown. OL depth is a major priority. |
|
01-16-2006, 10:58 AM | #13 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Depth on the offensive and defensive lines. I felt our defensive front played much better down the stretch, but we do need to have a good dominating front line on both offensive and defensive lines.
We also need another deep threat Wide Out. Maybe Patten will bounce back and be that guy, but I believe we need to look for another receiver to help Moss.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!" |
01-16-2006, 10:58 AM | #14 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 40
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
I think you are 100% right on with the draft. I am a firm believer in Madden's old saying that "it all starts with the line." Fans seem SO inclined to go after the next WR with a shitty attitude or the next superstar player. Maybe it's watching too many Sportscenter highlights or playing too much fantasy football where the line doesn't matter, but all those highlights and all those amazing stats, catches, runs and players only happen be cause the line got it done first. On a VERY few occasions will a player do something incredible when the line breaks down, but that is the major exception, NOT the rule. Clinton Portis is nothing if he's got no hole to hit. Mark Brunell or even Peyton Manning are just big targets if they've got no protection. I say we spend almost every pick we have on the offensive line and maybe some on the defensive line. I'm a little more concerned about the offense than the defense so I lean more toward the O-line than the D-line, but it wouldn't hurt to have a pass-rush specialist. Again I think you're right on with the Patten thing. I think we should ALL temper our enthusiasm over the #2 wideout problem. I would agree that we absolutely need at LEAST one other good WR, especially since we have no depth whatsoever at this position. However, as I said in a previous post, a star #2 WR is NOT the solution. Santana Moss managed to become the #2 WR in the NFL this year even without the compliment of a true #2 threat. He had 80 less yards than Steve Smith. If people really think that the root of al our problems is the lack of a #2 threat to open up more for Moss, than they must also think that a team has to have a reciever with close to 2000 yards in order to be a real contender. Let's definitely get some depth at WR and get some good posession guys, but let's not trade every pick, decent player and spend every last dime to reel in a T.O., Randy Moss or some other distaster waiting to happen.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
01-16-2006, 11:01 AM | #15 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Draft, FAs, etc
Quote:
I agree, I think there are upgrades to be made over Reynaldo Wynn. But I think he's better than he gets credit for. Not much in the way of pass rushing, but he's huge at stopping the run. Plus the leadership and locker room presence should not be ignored. It's just that we might not be able to address all 4 of the priorities you listed with quality players. I think we all agree that a WR is desperately needed. The ability to grab a big-time starting DE who can rush the passer will depend largely on our salary cap space. Remember, DEs like that are expensive. Wynn's arm fracture could help decide his fate, who knows. But if we're faced with salary cap constraints, my priorities go in this order: 1) WR 2) O-Line depth 3) Nickel CB 4) DE |
|
|
|