Winning

[punch it in]

The irony and hypocrisy is just tremendous. Bravo! The biggest bully in the world is Trump and you clowns have a problem with Jim Acosta’s tone? The liberals are all snowflakes who need safe spaces to cry in but Trump is literally forming a safe space to hold his press conferences where nobody will dare challenge him or ask him questions he doesn’t want to answer? Bravo! You have all officially created an opposite world for your rhetoric where you can dish it out without taking it. Bratty little rotten kids all over the world applaud you. Congratulations. 🤮🤥

[Giantone]

LOL, yeah it's not a cult.

[MTK]

Maybe given the current climate it's best to avoid a fuzzy term like nationalist? Just maybe? Either way none of this makes his behavior yesterday appropriate.

[punch it in]

And another thing, shouldn’t we change this thread title to “losing” (as in the house and the power for him to continue to act like a dictator) ?

[Chico23231]

Acosta needs to keep his hands to himself...and until he learns that, he cant come back.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Acosta needs to keep his hands to himself...and until he learns that, he cant come back.

Lol. Omg. This coming from the party of trump. So when he gently places his hand on the arm of someone trying to take his mic that is grounds for dismissal. Maybe he should have grabbed her pussy. Again gtfoh. When this all started we were all told to keep our grievances and our calling bs to ourselves. Accept it u all said. He is the potus. Get over it. Find a safe space. U r all snowflakes. My how u need to follow ur own shitty advice OR let us, acosta, and the news call BS.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Lol. Omg. This coming from the party of trump. So when he gently places his hand on the arm of someone trying to take his mic that is grounds for dismissal. Maybe he should have grabbed her pussy. Again gtfoh. When this all started we were all told to keep our grievances and our calling bs to ourselves. Accept it u all said. He is the potus. Get over it. Find a safe space. U r all snowflakes. My how u need to follow ur own shitty advice OR let us, acosta, and the news call BS.

This used to be my jam like in 4th grade...Goergia Satellites..."Accosta keep your hands to yo self..."

[jamf]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Acosta needs to keep his hands to himself...and until he learns that, he cant come back.

More hypocrite bullshit.

I bet you only wanted the FOX News
EDITED Version

Some how you are outraged by this and not Captain "Grab them in the pussy" or Kavenoughs Cuddle With a Struggle?

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by jamf

More hypocrite bullshit.

I bet you only wanted the FOX News
EDITED Version

Some how you are outraged by this and not Captain "Grab them in the pussy" or Kavenoughs Cuddle With a Struggle?

I wasn't watching Fox but I saw the replay on CNN because they played it a zillion times....he dif touched her and shielded her.

If its edited...then yes its bs and fake news...but Im not the guy here who watches fox or defends it.

Capt Grabbin that was just lockeroom talk and Big Kavy, well an investigation was done...that was just a political hit job.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

I wasn't watching Fox but I saw the replay on CNN because they played it a zillion times....he dif touched her and shielded her.



If its edited...then yes its bs and fake news...but Im not the guy here who watches fox or defends it.



Capt Grabbin that was just lockeroom talk and Big Kavy, well an investigation was done...that was just a political hit job.

No way he shielded himself? And “touched” her? Hang him! Jesus effin Christ. U give the real pigs a pass but that offends u? If u did sed a video of Trump grabbing a pussy u would say something like she asked for it. Im following JamF. Im outta here. But ill be back in like an hour.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by punch it in

No way he shielded himself? And “touched” her? Hang him! Jesus effin Christ. U give the real pigs a pass but that offends u? If u did sed a video of Trump grabbing a pussy u would say something like she asked for it. Im following JamF. Im outta here. But ill be back in like an hour.

[mooby]

Side note, the fact that you guys think being a nationalist has nothing to do with white supremacy is symptomatic of the problems we have today. You are literally saying a label means what you think it means, not what other people think it means. Refusing to see things from anyone else's perspective is one of the reasons we're at where we're at today.

It's literally a label. In the grand scheme of things, a small issue. But everything, literally fucking everything, has to be a all-or-nothing deal. God fucking forbid you look at things from a different perspective.

[Schneed10]

The term nationalist means someone is an advocate for the political independence of its country, or a feeling of superiority regarding one's country over others. That's what it actually means. Because a bunch of racists have said that they identify as nationalist, doesn't mean all nationalists are racist.

I'm a nationalist. I'm not remotely racist, but I believe that our system of government is superior to all others on Earth, and we should push for other countries in dictatorships to adopt as similar a form of government as possible to ours.

The liberal media has definitely hijacked the term nationalist, and is trying to associate it with racism. Sure, there is a huge intersection between people who want to secure the borders because they're racist and nationalist thinking. But you can just call those people racist, you don't have to try to hijack an entire term and try to twist it as synonymous with racism.

Casting a broad net with terms like this is what causes me to wave my hands at people and tell them to go fuck off with the PC nonsense. Be precise with your terms. Nationalism is not necessarily racism. You can be nationalist but embracing of the melting pot that is our nation.

If someone is racist, just call THEM racist. Don't call all nationalists racists, because a) it's not true and b) you end up losing the level headed people as they check out from civil discourse.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

The term nationalist means someone is an advocate for the political independence of its country, or a feeling of superiority regarding one's country over others. That's what it actually means. Because a bunch of racists have said that they identify as nationalist, doesn't mean all nationalists are racist.



I'm a nationalist. I'm not remotely racist, but I believe that our system of government is superior to all others on Earth, and we should push for other countries in dictatorships to adopt as similar a form of government as possible to ours.



The liberal media has definitely hijacked the term nationalist, and is trying to associate it with racism. Sure, there is a huge intersection between people who want to secure the borders because they're racist and nationalist thinking. But you can just call those people racist, you don't have to try to hijack an entire term and try to twist it as synonymous with racism.



Casting a broad net with terms like this is what causes me to wave my hands at people and tell them to go fuck off with the PC nonsense. Be precise with your terms. Nationalism is not necessarily racism. You can be nationalist but embracing of the melting pot that is our nation.



If someone is racist, just call THEM racist. Don't call all nationalists racists, because a) it's not true and b) you end up losing the level headed people as they check out from civil discourse.

This is very true but when his reference comes on the back of “good people on both sides” mexican rapists, i mean i could go on n on here for days with what it came on the heels of- than it becomes a whole new ball game. This is not some guy with no history of disparaging remarks against other races, religions, or sexes that is being tied to the whipping post for using one word one time. So please spare me the “how could u accuse him of being a racist” crap.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by punch it in

This is very true but when his reference comes on the back of “good people on both sides” mexican rapists, i mean i could go on n on here for days with what it came on the heels of- than it becomes a whole new ball game. This is not some guy with no history of disparaging remarks against other races, religions, or sexes that is being tied to the whipping post for using one word one time. So please spare me the “how could u accuse him of being a racist” crap.

You're right about Trump, he's unequivocally a racist. That was established during the campaign when his treatment as a landlord towards African Americans came to the forefront. He continues to show it today.

I will in no way defend him. I just take umbrage at this notion that the media can just take a term that has long-established dictionary meaning and twist it as if it's equivocal to racism.