|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Are we better, worse, or as good as our record? | |||
We are a better team than our record suggests, we've just lost to some great teams | 52 | 62.65% | |
We are worse than our record suggests | 0 | 0% | |
We are what we are, a 6-6 team | 31 | 37.35% | |
Voters: 83. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-05-2005, 08:47 PM | #1 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Sally Jenkins' recent boneheaded article got me thinking, "What is our strength of schedule?" It turns out that our opponents combined records thus far is 82-60. Pretty tough. Plus, we have faced 4 of the league's 8 division leaders (Chicago, Seattle, Denver, and the Giants) and split such games (beating Chicago and Seattle and losing to Denver and the Giants).
We are beating and losing to some pretty darn good teams. The only team that beat us that shouldn't have beaten us is Oakland. Oakland aside, the combined record of the teams that beat us is a whopping 41-19. Moreover, with the notable exception of the Giants game, those losses have been decided by the last play of the game. In short, we are at worst an average team and at best, an above average team that has faced, and lost to, some damn fine opponents. |
Advertisements |
12-05-2005, 09:00 PM | #2 |
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
I say...we are what we are, a 6-6 ball club. If we had lost those games more convisingly (that we were actually a worse team), then I would say we fell victim to our record. Outside of the Cheifs and Giants games, we pretty much outplayed all our opponents but couldnt finish the job. Therefore, I think we are what we are.
__________________
#21 |
12-05-2005, 09:06 PM | #3 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Potomac Falls, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,762
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
I agree with Gmac If if werent for turnovers and penalties we would have a better record. Those reasons being Nobodys fault but theirs they are what they are. (sorry I voted the other way tho)
|
12-05-2005, 09:18 PM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
According to NFL.com we have a .577 strength of schedule which is good for the second hardest in the NFL this year(Poor Houston has a .601). Our strength of victory is good for 3rd. So we have officially played a pretty hard schedule this year. The good news is that of the remaining NFC teams in the hunt we have the easiest strength of schedule prior to this weekend, All this adds up to diddly poo as Jim Mora Sr, would say. Just win our next four and we're almost guranteed to be in.
|
12-05-2005, 09:27 PM | #5 |
Propane and propane accessories
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 55
Posts: 4,714
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Actually, part of what makes our strength of schedule hard is that WE lost games, making our opponents record stronger, at least as you look back over the season (not sure if that's clear--sorry!).
Anyway, wins talk, everything else walks--we're 6-6 because we have a bad TO ratio, couldn't hold some late leads, and have trouble on 3rd-and-short at crucial moments. No one to blame but our selves--if we take care of our own house, our record will improve. (I'm not saying anyone disagrees with that, just that it's hard for me to see much in this strength of schedule thing.)
__________________
Hail from Houston! |
12-05-2005, 09:49 PM | #6 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern Virginia, Woodbridge
Age: 62
Posts: 2,507
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We're a better team than the record but not by a ton.
__________________
Check out Mike Hedrick - The Next Food Network Star. Please Click and give me a Thumbs Up and Positive Comment. Thanks |
12-05-2005, 10:01 PM | #7 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
|
|
12-05-2005, 10:19 PM | #8 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We are what we are, an average team. Good teams don't beat themselves and don't let themselves be put in position to lose close games due to referee errors, coaching decisions and fate.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
12-05-2005, 10:21 PM | #9 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
|
|
12-05-2005, 11:07 PM | #10 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 55
Posts: 1,587
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We have won almost as many close games as we have lost, but here are my thoughts.
We are better than our record simply because Alstott did not get in. We won. We are better on offense than we were last year. We have had one hell of a tough schedule and are still alive to make the playoffs. If we go 9-7, I would be happy. We need another receiver and a couple of d-linemen to be dominant.
__________________
Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts. A. Einstien |
12-05-2005, 11:21 PM | #11 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
|
|
12-05-2005, 11:22 PM | #12 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
|
|
12-06-2005, 07:58 AM | #13 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
if we are a better team than our record indicates,than running the table is not out of the question.im not sold on eli manning and the giants.but i am impressed with their defense.i think plaxico is big time over rated
|
12-06-2005, 09:22 AM | #14 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,462
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
We've definitely had a killer schedule and went toe to toe with some of the best teams in the league.
If we could have only come out of the AFC West games with a split we'd be in great position for the playoffs right now. There's no doubt this team has lost some tough games, but in the end they only have themselves to blame. Good teams don't beat themselves with penalties and turnovers week after week. |
12-06-2005, 09:27 AM | #15 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Redskins' Strength of Schedule: We Are A Decent Team
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|