Eagles Postgame

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

Yeah we gotta go heavy with Oline in the offseason.. Cosmi got manhandled by Cox a few times yesterday.

Who hasn't been beaten by Cox? Cox is a great player.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by punch it in

OLine Oline Oline LB more Oline. That is my draft strategy.

That was supposed to be the 2023 strategy OL, LB and CB. Ron and his front office are idiots.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

That was supposed to be the 2023 strategy OL, LB and CB. Ron and his front office are idiots.

Preaching to the choir. Lol.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by MTK

While I'm not going to kill Ron over the decision, but I would have gone for 2.

But what I will kill him over is his weak explanation saying the offense was gassed. Fuck that man, as head coach you own the decision.

You can call it weak, but I appreciate the honesty. He assessed the situation and made a decision he felt was best. At least he didn't flip a coin. Sounds like it was 50/50 on the sideline with regard to what everyone expected him to do. I'm fine with it. They got the ball and had the first chance to win. But they didn't.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

That was supposed to be the 2023 strategy OL, LB and CB. Ron and his front office are idiots.

The first four picks (out of seven) were secondary and o-line.

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

Yeah we gotta go heavy with Oline in the offseason.. Cosmi got manhandled by Cox a few times yesterday.

Sounds like G1s Saturday night AAAYYYY OOOOO!!!!!

[BaltimoreSkins]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

Right now? Very hard to find at 11pm in Japan... You know I'll do anything for good cheese though... (Except maybe going for 2 with no time left in the game when you have momentum, a young QB still making some costly mistakes and a Oline that you can't have faith in to just push it into the end zone for you.)


(Brilliant memory btw , but it's brillat-savarin)

My bad. I guess the flip side of that is if you don't trust them to make one play how do you trust them to make a 75 yard drive? Regardless I am not upset by the decision. I would have liked the gamble but think going to OT is also fair. I've just been waiting to tell you to go eat some brillat-savarin when we disagree on something. So took my shot.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by BaltimoreSkins

Sounds like G1s Saturday night AAAYYYY OOOOO!!!!!

Hahaha!

[SkinsGuru]

Originally Posted by MTK

Only a matter of time before he costs us a game.

he may have cost us last nights game . . . the snap on that final punt was horrible and caused Way to have one of his worse punts of the year in a crucial situation. while it didn't directly cost us the game is sure gave philly good field position on that last drive.

[AnonEmouse]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

The first four picks (out of seven) were secondary and o-line.

True, but who did they ignore to take who they did? Forbes was a good pick (though maybe I'd have taken Gonzalez instead), but after that? Martin? Mauch or trading back would probably be better choices. Stromberg maybe best at that point (debatable) but if we'd traded back, we'd have had more picks and more options. Daniels, better than Carter Warren?

Yes 4 of 7 were DB and OL, but we probably passed up on better options that would have properly bolstered our OL and LB corps. Both were sorely in need and they still are.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

True, but who did they ignore to take who they did? Forbes was a good pick (though maybe I'd have taken Gonzalez instead), but after that? Martin? Mauch or trading back would probably be better choices. Stromberg maybe best at that point (debatable) but if we'd traded back, we'd have had more picks and more options. Daniels, better than Carter Warren?

Yes 4 of 7 were DB and OL, but we probably passed up on better options that would have properly bolstered our OL and LB corps. Both were sorely in need and they still are.

I was pointing out the strategy, not whether the particular picks will pan out, which we may not know for some time.

[Chief X_Phackter]

Anyway, who are we to say what was "supposed to be" the 2023 strategy.

The strategy is to get better - period. Lots of ways to do that, and thousands more ways to pick those decisions apart

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Sam Howell needs to be developed. I’m taking QB off the board in the first round next year.

Oline, Oline, Oline next year

I 100% agree with this and then some. And he is going to have some more rough patches but I don't care. He more than passes the eye test. That was some big boy shit yesterday, especially on that last drive. That is exactly what you look for in your QB.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

The first four picks (out of seven) were secondary and o-line.

Should have picked a T earlier than the 4th round. Mason Brooks played T in college, they should develop him to play T instead of inside ASAP.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter

The first four picks (out of seven) were secondary and o-line.

Completely ignored LB and those Oline picks were reaches. Especially Daniels. The Martin pick was a reach too. Bottom line is we need a GM.