Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Lavar In 2008

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2008, 11:30 AM   #121
redskinz79
Camp Scrub
 
redskinz79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Seoul, Korea
Age: 45
Posts: 76
Re: Lavar In 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coff View Post
Quality LB's since/during LeVar:

Pierce
Marshall
McIntosh
Washington
Lemer Marshall? Cmon man.. if you wanna put this guy in the same breath as a healthy Lavar.. u are nuts.

Also... Mcintosh is still unproven. And it looks like he's also injury prone. His developement has been good but it's too soon to tell.

Washington is consistent and gets the job done. However he is not a playmaker nor is he the type of talent that Lavar was.

Pierce is probably the only quality LB that u mentioned here.

Anyhow, I just love how warpath is divided into the pro-lavar & the anti-lavar.

Me personally I like him. I think his agent mis-represented Lavar severely during the contract negotiations and probably was the bad apple that soured his tenure here and with the organization. All in all, I hope that Lavar plays somewhere again. He's got too much passion and talent to be wasted.

Here is the video where he knocked Aikman into retirement.
YouTube - LaVar retires Aikman
redskinz79 is offline  

Advertisements
Old 01-14-2008, 07:56 PM   #122
rk3025
Registered User
 
rk3025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 92
Re: Lavar In 2008

How about defense being a team when Lavar played his great years how many games did we have a top rated defense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskinz79 View Post
Lemer Marshall? Cmon man.. if you wanna put this guy in the same breath as a healthy Lavar.. u are nuts.

Also... Mcintosh is still unproven. And it looks like he's also injury prone. His developement has been good but it's too soon to tell.

Washington is consistent and gets the job done. However he is not a playmaker nor is he the type of talent that Lavar was.

Pierce is probably the only quality LB that u mentioned here.

Anyhow, I just love how warpath is divided into the pro-lavar & the anti-lavar.

Me personally I like him. I think his agent mis-represented Lavar severely during the contract negotiations and probably was the bad apple that soured his tenure here and with the organization. All in all, I hope that Lavar plays somewhere again. He's got too much passion and talent to be wasted.

Here is the video where he knocked Aikman into retirement.
YouTube - LaVar retires Aikman
rk3025 is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 12:21 AM   #123
blitzfiftysix
Camp Scrub
 
blitzfiftysix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Re: Lavar In 2008

See my name? Blitzfiftysix. I love Lavar. He is done with football and will never play for the Redskins or any other NFL team again.

Move along folks, nothing to see here.
blitzfiftysix is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 01:37 AM   #124
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Lavar In 2008

washington is way better than lavar, and so is fletcher, and so was pierce. consistency counts.

that said... 4 pages on lavar? seriously?
That Guy is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 01:45 AM   #125
Tha Posse
Special Teams
 
Tha Posse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 241
Re: Lavar In 2008

I'm not arguing I'm just asking. Why does everyone say his knee's are shot. I thought when he was here he injured one knee not two. When he was with the Giants his knee was doing fine once the regular season came about, and he was put on IR because of a achilles tear. Also I thought the motorcycle injury was flesh wounds and didn't have anything to do with his knee or knees. I would like to see him as a backup for vet min.
Tha Posse is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 09:52 AM   #126
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Lavar In 2008

if lavar wants to play he will try, if he doesn't he will be fine also. The guy is a football player first, all of them are. If they can some how come back to get on the field they all would. The fact people out here want to always say this person is done, his knees this and knees that have about as much a clue into someones physical ability as the man on the moon. Its all speculation, on both sides. For all any of us know, he could be back to 100%, knees healthy after the layoff. The loss of weight may have helped, may have some of the quickness back. Or, he could be completely done, who cares. if funny how LaVar threads still end up being the most debated subject on this board. I have been here 3 years(i think) and its crazy how the debates turn into a huge deal. Doesn't matter, we will all find out in June or july if he wants to play. If any of you are new you will quickly learn that anyone that leaves the Redskins they are all of the sudden trash and never were any good, we should have never drafted him, he was more trouble than what he was worth. I have been fighting that battle for as long as I have been here. We can only wait and see if he comes back. if he does great, if he doesn't great. but lets all stop saying he's done, his body is done, knees are shot because honestly you know you dont know squat about his condition, unless you are his physical therapist
#56fanatic is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 10:38 AM   #127
DiehardSkin88
Registered User
 
DiehardSkin88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 162
Re: Lavar In 2008

He's done
DiehardSkin88 is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 11:12 AM   #128
Coff
Impact Rookie
 
Coff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Halfmoon, NY
Posts: 686
Re: Lavar In 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by redskinz79 View Post
Lemer Marshall? Cmon man.. if you wanna put this guy in the same breath as a healthy Lavar.. u are nuts.

Also... Mcintosh is still unproven. And it looks like he's also injury prone. His developement has been good but it's too soon to tell.

Washington is consistent and gets the job done. However he is not a playmaker nor is he the type of talent that Lavar was.

Pierce is probably the only quality LB that u mentioned here.

Anyhow, I just love how warpath is divided into the pro-lavar & the anti-lavar.

Me personally I like him. I think his agent mis-represented Lavar severely during the contract negotiations and probably was the bad apple that soured his tenure here and with the organization. All in all, I hope that Lavar plays somewhere again. He's got too much passion and talent to be wasted.
I think you misunderstood the point I was making. I'm certainly not suggesting that Marshall is in the same category as Arrington!! I agree that Arrington at his best was better than all the guys on that list; I was just responding to a post that said we have had no quality linebackers since LeVar left.

I don't mean to suggest that these guys are all pro-bowlers, but they all are/were competent for this team, and therefore were "quality" guys. I wouldn't say McIntosh is unproven; he was kicking ass in the beginning of this season, and then forced offenses to adjust to his side of the field. Washington's first two years with us were very productive; he was a pro-bowler in '04, and an alternate in '05 and '06. And as far as Lemar Marshall goes, don't forget he took Arrington's job, and not just because Arrington was hurt. Williams preferred Marshall to Arrington because he made less mistakes. Marshall will never be a playmaker nor will he ever go to a pro-bowl, and it was stupid to move him to the MLB and have him running the defense, but he was an OLB on the leagues 3rd best defense in '04, and I don't remember anyone suggesting he was a weakspot on the team. In fact, it was his success as an outside linebacker that encouraged Williams to try him as MLB. Stellar player? No. "Quality"? Yes.

The accusation I was responding to was suggesting that our linebacking corp has been weak since LeVar left, which is simply untrue. With the exception of '06 (when our d-line and our secondary were equally as bad), our linebackers have been a consistent strength of our defense.
Coff is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 08:00 PM   #129
rk3025
Registered User
 
rk3025's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hampton roads
Posts: 92
Re: Lavar In 2008

McIntosh, Williams and Fletcher have consist defense something that Lavar's Special Defense did not have as great as he was
\team work will beat one person every time

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coff View Post
I think you misunderstood the point I was making. I'm certainly not suggesting that Marshall is in the same category as Arrington!! I agree that Arrington at his best was better than all the guys on that list; I was just responding to a post that said we have had no quality linebackers since LeVar left.

I don't mean to suggest that these guys are all pro-bowlers, but they all are/were competent for this team, and therefore were "quality" guys. I wouldn't say McIntosh is unproven; he was kicking ass in the beginning of this season, and then forced offenses to adjust to his side of the field. Washington's first two years with us were very productive; he was a pro-bowler in '04, and an alternate in '05 and '06. And as far as Lemar Marshall goes, don't forget he took Arrington's job, and not just because Arrington was hurt. Williams preferred Marshall to Arrington because he made less mistakes. Marshall will never be a playmaker nor will he ever go to a pro-bowl, and it was stupid to move him to the MLB and have him running the defense, but he was an OLB on the leagues 3rd best defense in '04, and I don't remember anyone suggesting he was a weakspot on the team. In fact, it was his success as an outside linebacker that encouraged Williams to try him as MLB. Stellar player? No. "Quality"? Yes.

The accusation I was responding to was suggesting that our linebacking corp has been weak since LeVar left, which is simply untrue. With the exception of '06 (when our d-line and our secondary were equally as bad), our linebackers have been a consistent strength of our defense.
rk3025 is offline  
Old 01-18-2008, 09:44 PM   #130
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Lavar In 2008

Quote:
Originally Posted by rk3025 View Post
McIntosh, Williams and Fletcher have consist defense something that Lavar's Special Defense did not have as great as he was
\team work will beat one person every time
whaa???

malcolm, care to translate?
That Guy is offline  
Old 01-20-2008, 11:07 PM   #131
IggyG
Camp Scrub
 
IggyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 37
Re: Lavar In 2008

LaVar stinks!
IggyG is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 02:58 PM   #132
JLee9718
Impact Rookie
 
JLee9718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 573
Unhappy Re: Lavar In 2008

Well...since LeVar was my favorite Redskin, you'd think I would want him to come back to the team, but Williams doesn't like "star players," so I hope he doesn't try to sign with them again. Personally I thought he would have been great in passing situations, but they chose to take him out on third down. I didn't understand the logic then, and if somebody tried to explain it to me, I still wouldn't get it. All I know is that he won games for us while he was healthy. We got him out of college, not from another team, and I'm sick of the Redskins taking retreads from other teams for high draft choices. I want them to look for the next "LeVar" with draft choices, not trade those picks for somebody else's rejects.
JLee9718 is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 07:52 PM   #133
IggyG
Camp Scrub
 
IggyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 37
Re: Lavar In 2008

lets not forget...Lavar Sucks! He left us. Screw him!
IggyG is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 09:10 PM   #134
REDSKIN-TIME
Camp Scrub
 
REDSKIN-TIME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 15
Re: Lavar In 2008

I Think They Shound Give It A Try
REDSKIN-TIME is offline  
Old 01-21-2008, 10:16 PM   #135
T.O.Killa
The Starter
 
T.O.Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
Re: Lavar In 2008

I wish I got credit for how many people responded to this thread, I would be a moderator now. This thread won die.
T.O.Killa is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 4.40822 seconds with 10 queries