|
12-09-2009, 07:24 PM
|
#1321 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I think he'll be resigned, with the understanding that he will compete for the job with the Skins first round pick, and maybe even get an incumbent year so the pick can make a more traditional transition to the pro game.
I wonder what Campbells record is when AHEAD by one score with 6 minutes left... |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
12-10-2009, 02:04 PM
|
#1322 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Jason Campbell - Washington Redskins - Situational Statistics - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 02:16 PM
|
#1323 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
D.C. Sports Bog - Is Jason Campbell Un-clutch?
heres the whole article, it would be nice to see someone like brady's or farves numbers to know what to compare it to i know jc probably won't win us any games but he is the best option for our qb this year and next year, hopefully he will have a chance next year behind a line
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 04:16 PM
|
#1324 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I love some of the comments in that blog, if JC was the Vikes QB he would be 10-2... Really? so... Favre makes no impact? Or... JC is as good as Favre? 'Splain that one to me...
Oh and the Tony Romo comment is laughable... I mean no doubt Skins fans aren't going to like him for obvious reasons, and I can hang with "I have an irrational dislike of Tony Romo due to team affiliation and media overexposure" Hell so do I. But he's a significantly better QB than Jason Campbell is. Yeah I know that's going to bring some hate, hope the haters can back it up with something besides rude smileys LOL |
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 04:34 PM
|
#1325 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 05:45 PM
|
#1326 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Romo 57 games played 53 Int's or 0.9 per game average
Campbell 48 games 35 Int's or 0.7 per game... Not a very significant difference (far from "no match")... Want to see a significant difference? Care to guess what Romo's willingness to take a few more chances and suffer 0.2 more INT's per game gets him? spoiler follows: . . . . 101 TD's versus 50 TD's... That's more than DOUBLE the touchdowns... 51 more TD's for 18 more Int's... about 2 TD's per game average versus about 1 TD per game average A 95.1 QB rating versus an 82.2 QB rating... This is an UNDRAFTED free agent versus a 1st round draft pick that the skins moved up to take... Campbell's numbers don't lie indeed! Only the ones that are telling the story aren't the ones his supporters want to concentrate on. |
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 06:02 PM
|
#1327 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
You can compare Romo and JC's numbers all day but unless they played with the same team mates, coaches, system and circumstances it really doesn't amount to much.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 06:15 PM
|
#1328 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Campbell has a career INT% of 2.3 to 3.1 % for Romo, which is a big difference. Campbell has a career TD% of 3.3 to 5.9 % for Romo, which is also a big difference. But the net difference in adjustment to yards per attempt for TDs and INTs is all of 0.1 yards for the above difference. Romo is better only because he throws for more yards more frequently and gets sacked less than Campbell. It has nothing to do with the TD/INT ratio.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 06:17 PM
|
#1329 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 06:34 PM
|
#1330 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 07:05 PM
|
#1331 | |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 08:33 PM
|
#1332 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
The kicker screwed the pooch and got fired, well... the snap was high, and... NO he got fired... Vinny Cerrato is an awful GM, well he did hit with Davis and Orakpo and Snyder is meddlsome; No fire him! Zorn is a bad HC: well, he's such a nice man, he's taken a lot of BS from his employer and he's learning on the job, and to be fair he had no experience; sorry fire him! Campbell has averaged 1 TD a game career, and only 0.2 less INT's than an undrafted free agent who is averaging 2... Well.... Campbell's a nice guy, and he's had to learn new system, and he's had his feelings hurt when the team looked at other guys... And: No... sorry... |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 08:38 PM
|
#1333 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
But because we're 3-9, he's at least somewhat replaceable. If we can lose with him, we can certainly lose without him. So you've got to at least shop him in the offseason, I would think.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 08:39 PM
|
#1334 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 08:55 PM
|
#1335 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 60
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Campbell 28 in 48 games = 0.58 fumbles per game Romo 35 in 57 = 0.61 Lost: 0.25 0.28 If Romo is a "fumbler" so is Campbell... |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
