Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Grade the Redskins 2010 draft class
A 14 8.14%
B 97 56.40%
C 54 31.40%
D 4 2.33%
F 3 1.74%
Voters: 172. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2010, 11:09 PM   #106
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Speaking of Jarmon is he supposed to be gaining weight or losing weight this offseason? First I heard this offseason the were going to stand him up at OLB in the 3-4 and now I'm not so sure that is even possible or if that it's still the plan? It's more likely for him to gain ten/fifteen pounds and play his natural position at DE isn't it?

The team site lists him as a LB. A 277 pound LB?
Last heard he's shooting for the 260 range, I don't think the weights on player profiles are updated until training camp.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-27-2010, 03:49 AM   #107
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

^ funny, cause Shanahan said he's our DE...

What I was going to say was that when the draft came around, I really didn't like much of our second day picks, such as Terrence Austin and Dennis Morris. I was like here we go again, not addressing the OL and getting another TE and receiver. But then I noticed Morris will be our FB, and that he's a BEAST blocker. I was just watching Terrence Austins blazing speed and return highlights and thought to myself he reminds me of a poor mans desean jackson; gee isn't that McNabbs favorite target? So now I'm looking at those at the time bad picks, and now think they're really good picks. Now I'm thinking Capers was probably our worst pick. I was watching his Senior Bowl highlights, and man was he exposed worse than Erin Andrews was. He got owned by speed rushers and some power rushers. He'll probably get cut.

I was wondering what everyone thought about who our best pick was who will get the most playing time/ impact besides Trent Williams?
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 07:50 AM   #108
johno
Impact Rookie
 
johno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southwest, DC
Posts: 599
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
^ funny, cause Shanahan said he's our DE...

What I was going to say was that when the draft came around, I really didn't like much of our second day picks, such as Terrence Austin and Dennis Morris. I was like here we go again, not addressing the OL and getting another TE and receiver. But then I noticed Morris will be our FB, and that he's a BEAST blocker. I was just watching Terrence Austins blazing speed and return highlights and thought to myself he reminds me of a poor mans desean jackson; gee isn't that McNabbs favorite target? So now I'm looking at those at the time bad picks, and now think they're really good picks. Now I'm thinking Capers was probably our worst pick. I was watching his Senior Bowl highlights, and man was he exposed worse than Erin Andrews was. He got owned by speed rushers and some power rushers. He'll probably get cut.

I was wondering what everyone thought about who our best pick was who will get the most playing time/ impact besides Trent Williams?
haha ouch. too soon?

but to answer your last question, i really want it to be capers at RT. i know that its a longshot, and i am not saying its the most likely, but thats the player i want to be really successful. not having to worry about LT and RT for the next few years would be really sweet.
__________________
fight for old dc.
johno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:02 AM   #109
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Jarmon will probably play both OLB and DE.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:07 AM   #110
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by CultBrennan59 View Post
^ funny, cause Shanahan said he's our DE...

What I was going to say was that when the draft came around, I really didn't like much of our second day picks, such as Terrence Austin and Dennis Morris. I was like here we go again, not addressing the OL and getting another TE and receiver. But then I noticed Morris will be our FB, and that he's a BEAST blocker. I was just watching Terrence Austins blazing speed and return highlights and thought to myself he reminds me of a poor mans desean jackson; gee isn't that McNabbs favorite target? So now I'm looking at those at the time bad picks, and now think they're really good picks. Now I'm thinking Capers was probably our worst pick. I was watching his Senior Bowl highlights, and man was he exposed worse than Erin Andrews was. He got owned by speed rushers and some power rushers. He'll probably get cut.

I was wondering what everyone thought about who our best pick was who will get the most playing time/ impact besides Trent Williams?
Based on the little bit I know (didn't watch the sr. bowl) I liked the Capers pick. Maybe his stock dropped in the sr. bowl & in the combine when teams saw that he isn't that strong. The latter can be corrected. He is a project, probably needs a couple years in the weight room. From what I've read it sounds like he has the athletic ability to make it if he works hard on technique & strength training.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:38 AM   #111
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,384
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

I think Capers was a huge steal, I know only time will tell, but I hope that this draft may have settled both our tackle problems by next season at the latest. And one step further, we may find that our tackles become the ZBS Hogs. Both Williams and Capers need upper body work, but are agile and quick, the question is will the be able to handle the NFCE DE/OLBs. Another good thing about Capers, I believe, is that he will constantly be pushing Williams, atleast until both have earned their respective spots, at which point they will be acclaimed as the best tackle pair in the sport.

Man am I full of hope or what!
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:13 AM   #112
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Man am I full of hope or what!
Hope or hallucinogens.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:15 AM   #113
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

[QUOTE=mlmdub130;695098]simple answer there, mason wasn't a second round draft pick he was a udfa, kelly on the other hand wasn't a udfa yet he wasa second round pick

if he doesn't produce this year he will be gone but you can't justify getting rid of a second rounder after one unproductive year and one injury prone year[/QUOTE]

I understand what your trying to say, Kelly was a 2nd round draft pick so obviously he has talent. Mason was an UFA which obviously means he doesn't and teams would be taking a chance on him anyway.

I would counter that Mason was a good runner but his problem was he kept fumbling. Not to mention Zorn's scheme again which didn't help any of our players. If he sucked completely teams wouldn't be trying to pick him up. We picked him up. Baltimore picked him up. The Jets picked him up and actually had him on their roster for the year, not on PS. The Chargers wanted him but due to a technicality (us having a worse record) we were able to win the bid on him over them. Now he's with the Chargers. Obviously coach's see something with him. I'm just tired of waiting like the rest of you.

I'm almost at that point with Kelly. I hope he has a break out year. All I'm saying is what if he doesn't?
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:24 AM   #114
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,384
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Hope or hallucinogens.
either way, and I'm not saying which, it's better than being a
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 11:27 AM   #115
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

for what it's worth, I listened to the Thundering Herd podcast yesterday and he said the Skins had one of the best drafts of any team. He criticized other analysts for praising teams like the Eagles and Patriots who have multiple 2nd round picks every year and claiming that they had great drafts when if you look at the team 2-3 years later, those 2nd round picks arent doing anything. He said the Redskins used their 2nd round pick on Donovan McNabb, who will be better than Bradford, Clausen or any other rookie QB over the next 4-5 years and then we used our 1st round pick on a guy who will be a solid starting left tackle for the next 10 years. Then we used a late round pick to acquire a starting defensive end in our new defense. Heessentially said that those three guys will do more for our team this year than any three players drafted in the 2nd round by teams like philidelphia and new england. cowherd bashes the skins all the time so it was nice to see us get some praise from one of our biggest critics.

For those that hate the idea that we spent a 2nd rounder on a 33 year old QB, consider this - i think i saw a stat somewhere that showed something like 50% of 1st round QBs and 90% of QBs taken in the 2nd rounder or later were busts. Clausen could end up being great, and i think the panthers got great value selecting him with the 48th pick, but the chances of him being great are slim to none. mcnabb could start for the next 5 years if we wanted him to. even if we had traded up in the 1st round to get sam bradford, and even if he beat the odds, we'd have to give him a new contract or let him walk in 5-6 years anyway. so really, NOTHING is garaunteed for 5+ years anyway. given the choice, i think we made the smart decision by using a 2nd rounder on a guy we KNOW will play at a pro-bowl level (or close to it) for the next 5 years. obviously, we'll have to draft his replacement at some point. But i think whomever we draft has a much greater chance of success if he's learning from McNabb than if he were learning from Jason Campbell, Rex Grossman, or Colt Brennan. I'm not trying to knock Kevin Kolb, but i don't think he'd be anywhere near the player the Eagles think him to be if he hadn't been working closely with McNabb for the past 3 years. Hopefully, we can draft someone with alot of potential in 2011 and they can reap similar benefits learning under McNabb. Who knows, Pineapple Jesus may surprise us all and develop nicely under McNabb and the Shanahans.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 11:49 AM   #116
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

That hurt my eyes.

I agree with the points about the picks were put to excellent use. This could be our most successful draft class since Snyder took over.

I am definitely more confident in McNabb than Bradford or Claussen, both who have different types of issues. Bradford is an injury risk who would have cemented another season with a sub-par line (no Trent Williams). Also, he played in a system that seems to always put up big points at the college level and may not translate to pro success. Claussen played in a better system to translate to the NFL, but seems to have some maturity and possible locker room issues. I didn't completely take the rumors as truth, but when it came from his own mouth in the Gruden interview...he sunk his own ship.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 03:23 PM   #117
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

I've read just about every draft book thats out there. Good coaching will enable this:

1. TW will be a great LT, he was rated in the top 8
2. Morris was in the top 10 for TE's in Receiving Yds per gme, Receptions, Receiving TD's he placed 19 for Receptions.
3. Caspers was in the top 9 OL's in every magazine, he will be a great RT.
4. Cook plays multiple spots on the OL.
5. Austin should make it as a Return man eventually he will be the slot WR.
6. Riley will eventually replace Fletcher & make the DF's calls.

Back to the begining it's in the coach's hands to bring out the talent but i think we looking good for the next yrs.

HTTR.

Last edited by NYCskinfan82; 04-27-2010 at 09:00 PM.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:17 PM   #118
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Good Article with comments from Trent William OU coach:

Trent Williams’ position coach addresses the red flags - Redskins Journal
Good article. Williams' injuries are of some concern.

...I don't remember Okung having any injury history. Makes the FO's decision I bit more curious.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:22 PM   #119
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 55
Posts: 3,803
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

I think with our new strength & conditioning coaches he'll be fine, along with the 99% player workout participation he'll also be motivated.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 10:23 PM   #120
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Redskins 2010 Draft Class with Analysis

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Good article. Williams' injuries are of some concern.

...I don't remember Okung having any injury history. Makes the FO's decision I bit more curious.
At this point everyone has an injury history.

None of Williams' injuries caused him to miss any significant time so what's the concern?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.41804 seconds with 11 queries