11-16-2009, 03:24 PM | #1126 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
11-16-2009, 03:39 PM | #1127 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
11-16-2009, 03:47 PM | #1128 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Joe Montana, San Francisco 49ers - SB XXIII
Joe Montana, San Francisco 49ers - SB XXIV Jeff Hostetler, New York Giants - SB XXV Mark Rypien, Washington Redskins - SB XXVI Troy Aikman, Dallas Cowboys - SB XXVII Troy Aikman, Dallas Cowboys - SB XXVIII Steve Young, San Francisco 49ers - SB XXIX Troy Aikman, Dallas Cowboys - SB XXX Brett Favre, Green Bay Packers - SB XXXI John Elway, Denver Broncos - SB XXXII John Elway, Denver Broncos - SB XXXIII Kurt Warner, St. Louis Rams - SB XXXIV Trent Dilfer, Baltimore Ravens - SB XXXV Tom Brady, New England Patriots - SB XXXVI Brad Johnson, Tampa Bay Buccaneers - SB XXXVII Tom Brady, New England Patriots - SB XXXVIII Tom Brady, New England Patriots - SB XXXIX Ben Roethlisberger, Pittsburgh Steelers - SB XL Peyton Manning, Indianapolis Colts - SB XLI Eli Manning, New York Giants - SB XLII Ben Roethlisberger, Pittsburgh Steelers - SB XLIII Past SB winning QB's, id say this is a pretty good list. Nothing avg about them. But once here and there you will find a name that had a GREAT Defense that carried the team to the title but like i said for the most part these guys led their team to the "W". And the ones who rode their defense to the title,how often do you see a defense of that caliber? not very often do you see a defense like that of the 85 Bears, 2000 Ravens, or the Bucs of 2002. In these rare cases i believe these defenses actually outscored the opposing team all by themselves in the SB. In the post you had earlier where you stated if JC had an avg offensive supporting cast around him he could be a SB contending QB with a great defense. Well i think you would be hard pressed to find a pro QB who wouldnt, and thats the point, that you are more likely to win a title with a top QB with a top 10 defense than you are to have the stars align just right and have a great defense that wins the games for you.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
11-16-2009, 03:49 PM | #1129 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Campbell is on pace this type of season:
299 of 452 (66.1%) for 3,324 yards, 18 TDs and 14 INTs. QB rating of 87.9 It's another year of improvement, career highs in completion %, yards, QB rating, and TDs. All with a subpar offensive line. So is this a guy we look to move on from? I'm on the fence. |
11-16-2009, 03:56 PM | #1130 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
One thing I am sure of. The Redskins oline has been a major problem for a long long very long time.
The Samuels/Jansen combo was pretty overrated from day one. The line JC has had the fortune to play behind over his entire pro career has been a vastly overrated unit IMO. This year the line is just a freakin nightmare. Who knows how good the guy is? JC isn't any kind of hall of famer, but he has plenty of good skills. |
11-16-2009, 03:58 PM | #1131 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
11-16-2009, 03:59 PM | #1132 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Good post DB 101. It's the exception to the rule when a "mediocre" QB wins the SB.
The only reason this thread is "revived" is b/c Kyle Orton got hurt and didn't play the 2nd half and LB/the oline had a big game yesterday. JC had an average day. |
11-16-2009, 04:04 PM | #1133 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
If the protection is there for him, who knows? |
|
11-16-2009, 04:12 PM | #1134 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
11-16-2009, 04:12 PM | #1135 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
11-16-2009, 04:27 PM | #1136 |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Im sorry, i thought the goal was to win the SB. History has shown that the chances are pretty unlikely you will do that with a 50/50 QB.
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
11-16-2009, 04:27 PM | #1137 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I argue that it starts and ends with the oline. They shouldn't take all the blame, but I think they were kind of fooling us for many years. Just good enough to not get really exposed. |
|
11-16-2009, 04:34 PM | #1138 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Great quarterbacks can play well behind sub-par offensive lines. Look at what payton manning did in 2008 and what rothlesberger is doing now, as just two examples. You can make all the excuses you want for Campbell, but great quarterbacks make the players around them better, and Campbell hasnt done that and never will. Last year, i'd never heard of half the guys who are catching balls from manning now, but they all looked GREAT tonight. They'd look like doo-doo if Campbell was throwing to them. Campbell isnt the only problem on our offense, but he's probably the biggest. He could go to the pro-bowl behind a great O-line, but it wouldnt be because he's a game winner. he's a game manager. Thats all he's ever been and that's all he'll ever be.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
11-16-2009, 04:50 PM | #1139 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Of course that's the goal but by your scale 26 active QB must suck since only 6 active QB are Super Bowl winners. Teams win SB not individuals.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
11-16-2009, 04:55 PM | #1140 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,440
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
his problem is that his stat line is fine but the problem is he misses too many wide open wide receivers - he left 2 touchdowns that I saw on the field: the missed bomb to santana moss and the intentional grounding call where he should have seen Yoder wide open 2 yards from the end zone
__________________
"Tough times don't last but tough people do" -Mike Shanahan HTTR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|