Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


NFL divisional round thread.

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-11-2015, 12:34 PM   #76
Hijinx
The Starter
 
Hijinx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 49
Posts: 1,961
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
From what I understand, the player reported to the ref that he was ineligible. The Ravens can complain but the Pats followed the rules this time.
Where the Pats "gamed the system" was that, they did not give the refs any time to get that info to the Ravens coaches/players.

I am 100% sure there will be a rule change come next year. It is typical of Belicheat to do shit like this.
__________________
This is my signature, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
Hijinx is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 01-11-2015, 12:37 PM   #77
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Glad the Ravens lost, sucks the Pats won.

As a friend of mine said:

Q: What's worse than a playoff game between the Ravens and the Pats called by Cris Collinsworth?

A: Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 12:38 PM   #78
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,580
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Hurdling the line not once but twice was pretty sick, surprised the Panthers didn't change up the snap count the 2nd time around. He had the timing down perfect.
I need McC to find us a kam chancellor. He looked like the best player on the field last night. it was also stated by someone previously, but that dude is the most Sean Taylor like player I've seen. Freak athlete, huge hitter and big play specialist.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 12:50 PM   #79
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hijinx View Post
Where the Pats "gamed the system" was that, they did not give the refs any time to get that info to the Ravens coaches/players.

I am 100% sure there will be a rule change come next year. It is typical of Belicheat to do shit like this.
Well, that's on the Refs.

Quote:
If a player changes his eligibility, the Referee must alert the defensive captain after player has reported to him.
NFL Rules Digest: Position of Players at Snap

If the Refs told the D captain, then tough sh** that you were unprepared for the change-up. Call a time out and adjust.

On the other hand, if the Ref did not tell the D captain, well ... that's just more of the inconsistent reffing that happened throughout the game.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:13 PM   #80
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 38
Posts: 36,145
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Yeah, no they shouldn't have.
They were 10-6 Carolina was 7-8-1 not even close. Not saying the Eagles would have won anything but still
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:15 PM   #81
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,312
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hijinx View Post
Where the Pats "gamed the system" was that, they did not give the refs any time to get that info to the Ravens coaches/players.

I am 100% sure there will be a rule change come next year. It is typical of Belicheat to do shit like this.
That's not on New England. The refs and Baltimore should know that they're going to push the rules. Harbaugh got a 15 yarder cause he couldn't control himself. In a win or go home situation, everyone, coaches included, need to check their emotions.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:18 PM   #82
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,580
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Harbaugh unhappy that he got outcoached on that one.
This is what it comes down too. He should have called a timeout to adjust if he was that concerned
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:23 PM   #83
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
I need McC to find us a kam chancellor. He looked like the best player on the field last night. it was also stated by someone previously, but that dude is the most Sean Taylor like player I've seen. Freak athlete, huge hitter and big play specialist.
Actually, Kam and Earl Thomas were both drafted in 2010. The year before McCloughan joined the Hawks. [Same draft got them Okung and Golden Tate].

He was with the Hawks for their 2011, 2012 and 2013 drafts. Of the 30 picks from those three drafts (and according to PFT) only six players are no longer in the NFL. Three from 2011 and three 2013.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:33 PM   #84
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
From what I understand, the player reported to the ref that he was ineligible. The Ravens can complain but the Pats followed the rules this time.
Yup, they even showed the ref informing the defense on replay. Belicheat may have gamed the system again but this time it was legal.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:33 PM   #85
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
This is what it comes down too. He should have called a timeout to adjust if he was that concerned
Yup. Exactly. What did Harbaugh want the refs to do? Delay putting the ball in play so Baltimore could adjust? Once the ball is in play, that's it. NE can snap it as fast as they desire.

Again, it's up to the refs and Baltimore. As long as prior to putting the ball in play:
(1) NE reports to the refs about the change in eligibility; and
(2) Refs tell D's captain, then
(3) NE can snap the ball once in play.

Are D's given more time to adjust if a OL reports eligible? Do refs delay placing the ball in those situation? I highly doubt it. It's on the D to call a time out.

Harbaugh got caught with his pants down. Simple as that.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:36 PM   #86
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HailGreen28 View Post
Curious. How did the refs drop the ball on that one?
The refs should have announced which receiver was ineligible and give the defense the chance to identify the ineligible receiver prior to the snap.

In the same sense that the refs announce eligible receivers when they are wearing numbers considered 'ineligible' e.g. tackle eligible.
The refs announce player #72 is reporting as eligible.

The refs should have announced player #34 is reporting as ineligible.

But I don't fault the refs for not picking up what the Pats were doing because it was happening fast. I knew something was up but couldn't pin point it myself in realtime either, i was drinking too.

The Pats gained an advantage snapping the ball before the Ravens had a chance to identify the ineligible receiver thus forcing them to waste a defender covering an ineligible receiver. They had no way to know which receiver wasn't eligible and moreover the Pats made an effort for the ineligible receiver to look like he was eligible.

Like I said, tip of the hat to the hoodie.

Quote:
Wilson looked good yesterday. Running Qb just doing what is asked of him, not having to win the game on his own. Like 2012 here.
Sure. Running QB or whatever label you want to call him. Russ made plays runs and throws that helped win the game.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:36 PM   #87
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Yup. Exactly. What did Harbaugh want the refs to do? Delay putting the ball in play so Baltimore could adjust? Once the ball is in play, that's it. NE can snap it as fast as they desire.

Again, it's up to the refs and Baltimore. As long as prior to putting the ball in play:
(1) NE reports to the refs about the change in eligibility; and
(2) Refs tell D's captain, then
(3) NE can snap the ball once in play.

Are D's given more time to adjust if a OL reports eligible? Do refs delay placing the ball in those situation? I highly doubt it. It's on the D to call a time out.

Harbaugh got caught with his pants down. Simple as that.
Yes, and when he figures that out, he's gonna regret making noises now. All he is doing is calling attention to the pants down by his ankles.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:37 PM   #88
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 30gut View Post
The refs should have announced which receiver was ineligible and give the defense the chance to identify the ineligible receiver prior to the snap.

In the same sense that the refs announce eligible receivers when they are wearing numbers considered 'ineligible' e.g. tackle eligible.
The refs announce player #72 is reporting as eligible.

The refs should have announced player #34 is reporting as ineligible.


But I don't fault the refs for not picking up what the Pats were doing because it was happening fast. I knew something was up but couldn't pin point it myself in realtime either, i was drinking too.

The Pats gained an advantage snapping the ball before the Ravens had a chance to identify the ineligible receiver thus forcing them to waste a defender covering an ineligible receiver. They had no way to know which receiver wasn't eligible and moreover the Pats made an effort for the ineligible receiver to look like he was eligible.

Like I said, tip of the hat to the hoodie.

Sure. Running QB or whatever label you want to call him. Russ made plays runs and throws that helped win the game.
They did.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:41 PM   #89
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Yup, they even showed the ref informing the defense on replay. Belicheat may have gamed the system again but this time it was legal.
Belichick didn't "game the system," he simply used some players in an unconventional fashion.

Hey, Harbaugh "gamed the system" by preserving his timeouts and taking a penalty rather than calling a timeout, adjusting his defense and bringing the issue to the Refs attention.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2015, 01:42 PM   #90
30gut
Playmaker
 
30gut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
re: NFL divisional round thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
They did.
When did the refs announce over the mic: player X is not eligible? Maybe I missed it. But I sure don't recalling hearing the refs announce it.
30gut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43270 seconds with 10 queries