|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-01-2006, 02:37 AM | #76 | |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
|
Advertisements |
02-01-2006, 04:21 AM | #77 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-01-2006, 08:02 AM | #78 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
WOW, i just looked up JJ's age (32)...my bad, I didn't realize how old he was...NEVER MIND on him as our #3/2 WR, inless he's cheap and only wants a 2 year deal....
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
02-01-2006, 08:05 AM | #79 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Italy
Age: 47
Posts: 72
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Waybe if K. Robinson passes GIbb's personnel eval test and at the age of only 26, he might be a GOOD/SOLID pick up for #2/3 WR and KR (26yr avg.)...but I would break the bank on him and i would have option years to make sure his Character stays on par with what we consider as a Redskin.
__________________
World wide traveling SKINS FAN |
02-01-2006, 08:53 AM | #80 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 59
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Looking at the way Gibbs has operated in the past and contrast that with the initial performance of Snyder, I have to put Randle El in the category of a HIGH PROFILE free agent which Gibbs avoids. Joe looks for capable performers who are unappreciated by their present teams, viz Moss, and discards those on the Skins who have not improved to expectations, viz Gardner. Finding a WR in the draft, especially considering we have no first round pick, that can have an immediate impact in his first year in the NFL, will be very difficult to do. I anticipate Gibbs and Saunders will go "gold mining" again this year and come up with a nugget that no one else recognized.
|
02-01-2006, 11:35 AM | #81 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Everyone is acting like Randle EL is going to command huge money. He isn't. No one sees him as any more than a #2. He'll get good #2 money but it won't be huge. He can return kicks and punts. He causes confusion on the field. You have to account for him on every play. THIS is what we need. There MAY be bigger WRs. There MAY be more polished guys but Randle EL has some intangibles that I think would appeal to Gibbs and would be good to have. I know he is a sexy FA but I think it is based in solid analysis and not just over-hype.
And to those who say we need size. Why? What will size do for us if the guy is a stiff and can't get open? We had enough guys this year who only commanded single coverage and that is why Moss got derailed somewhat. We need a guy that CAN GET OPEN when he has single coverage. I think Robinson could fit but is he a guy Gibbs wants? If forced I would guess no. Moulds? He is clearly a declining player and the type of player Gibbs eschewed last year and even Snyder hasn't gone vet hunting in a while. I think they are both options if they come cheap. To me the guy with the biggest upside is Randle El. He is still learning how to be a WR so one would think he could make some skill improvements still and he offers a lot of other stuff. Getting a guy who can return kicks and punts allows us some flexibility at other positions too. Betts becomes more expendable now that he isn't the backup option at KR. Thrash may become expendable. AB is already gone I am sure. Randle El just seems like such a good fit in a lot of ways. |
02-01-2006, 12:50 PM | #82 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 68
Posts: 868
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
I like Antwaan Randle El. He fills a lot of needs. He is a solid #2 receiver, an explosive kick returner and punt returner. He is a player that allows you to be creative on offense (trick plays). If you get him for the right price, he fills a lot of voids.
__________________
"HAIL TO THE SKINS" |
02-01-2006, 05:06 PM | #83 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
02-02-2006, 05:48 PM | #84 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-02-2006, 05:50 PM | #85 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
the hawks will have lots of cap issues if they try to hold onto alexander this offseason. then there is hutchinson who is a free agent as well |
|
02-02-2006, 05:52 PM | #86 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-02-2006, 05:54 PM | #87 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
|
|
02-02-2006, 07:31 PM | #88 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
I'd bet they'd go younger there cause it'd save them 4+mill a year without a gigantic dropoff in performance (possibly get an rb that can catch while they're at it). |
|
02-02-2006, 07:35 PM | #89 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 336
|
Re: Randle El is the receiver we need to pursue (#2 WR discussion - Merged)
Quote:
morris did not look bad and with their potent passing game they might go with running back via committee |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|