Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Defense = Disappointment

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2009, 02:02 AM   #61
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Yeah, but, it was kind of ridiculous and a complete waste of my time.

You kind of ran out of steam around the time you claimed that we got away from running the ball. The rest of the time, you've just been playing catch-up.

Theory: they stuck you with Rams-Seahawks out there.
For help in assessing your wrongness you might want to watch the Zorn press-conference on redskins.com.

I don't live on a mountain, we have sports bars out here too.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-14-2009, 02:03 AM   #62
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
For help in assessing your wrongness you might want to watch the Zorn press-conference on redskins.com.
Seems like a bigger waste of time.

What would I learn if I did check it out?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:04 AM   #63
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Seems like a bigger waste of time.

What would I learn if I did check it out?
That the Redskins played their guts out...oh wait that was Joe Gibbs. LOL.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:04 AM   #64
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
That the Redskins played their guts out...oh wait that was Joe Gibbs. LOL.
Ha!!
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:05 AM   #65
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Seems like a bigger waste of time.

What would I learn if I did check it out?
Praises the defense, admits the offense couldn't do shit up until the second half.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:06 AM   #66
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
Praises the defense, admits the offense couldn't do shit up until the second half.
That's not good. The second half is when the offense reverted to past tendencies.

I guess someone has to stick up for the D tonight. I ain't doin it.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:08 AM   #67
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
That's not good. The second half is when the offense reverted to past tendencies.

I guess someone has to stick up for the D tonight. I ain't doin it.
You don't have to stick up for them, just realize that they didn't lose this game and they didn't suck more than the offense.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:09 AM   #68
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
You don't have to stick up for them, just realize that they didn't lose this game and they didn't suck more than the offense.
How 'bout both the offense and defense lost the game, ok?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:11 AM   #69
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
You don't have to stick up for them, just realize that they didn't lose this game and they didn't suck more than the offense.
Well, okay, I guess you have an turnover-related argument as far as costing us a winnable game. But if you take out ALL of the offensive contributions, yards, points, turnovers, and just look at the defensive contributions, you have two big plays mixed in with a completely uncompetitive game.

In reality, we only lost by 6. If I had just gone through the defensive plays only, I would have assumed a 14-17 point loss. And isn't that the real measuring stick here?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:17 AM   #70
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Well, okay, I guess you have an turnover-related argument as far as costing us a winnable game. But if you take out ALL of the offensive contributions, yards, points, turnovers, and just look at the defensive contributions, you have two big plays mixed in with a completely uncompetitive game.

In reality, we only lost by 6. If I had just gone through the defensive plays only, I would have assumed a 14-17 point loss. And isn't that the real measuring stick here?
Wait, what? You're confused. If you take away the offensive contributions from both teams we would still be left with the offense spotting them 6 pts. Don't know how you can attribute the offense giving up 6 pts to the defense.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:25 AM   #71
Trample the Elderly
Playmaker
 
Trample the Elderly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
That's not good. The second half is when the offense reverted to past tendencies.

I guess someone has to stick up for the D tonight. I ain't doin it.
I'll do it GD! As usual the offense stank. If Balche would only not give the WRs ten yards off the ball we'd shut those bastards down.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood.
Trample the Elderly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:28 AM   #72
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trample the Elderly View Post
I'll do it GD! As usual the offense stank. If Balche would only not give the WRs ten yards off the ball we'd shut those bastards down.
We're fine, they only had 250 yards for god sake. Plus, have you seen our CB play bump-and-run coverage? They'd get burned like charcoal.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 02:50 AM   #73
dan_snyder69
Camp Scrub
 
dan_snyder69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: maryland & south carolina
Posts: 92
Re: Defense = Disappointment

defense will be fine. i think people are underestimating just how good these Giants receivers are. i agree that offense was much more of a problem than defense today.
__________________
Moving to the South only has one drawback: No FedEx Field!
dan_snyder69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:24 AM   #74
number21isabadman
Special Teams
 
number21isabadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oregon
Age: 39
Posts: 157
Re: Defense = Disappointment

In my mind the only TD we scored today was on a fake fg, the td at the end was a pitty td in the fact they ny was playing prevent d, and quit applying pressure on the offense. We had plenty of chances to come back, but like always the offense was anemic.
number21isabadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2009, 03:28 AM   #75
itvnetop
Playmaker
 
itvnetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 3,007
Re: Defense = Disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by dan_snyder69 View Post
defense will be fine. i think people are underestimating just how good these Giants receivers are. i agree that offense was much more of a problem than defense today.
I agree that the NYG receivers are really underrated- only because their combined years experience is so low. Smith has been one of the best route runners I've seen since college- and he rarely ever drops a ball. Hixon is up and coming and Nicks seems to have been a steal in the draft.

But our secondary play was the pits yesterday... sloppy tackling, bad angles, nonsensical scheme (or maybe our guys are just playing to headhunt/make big plays).
itvnetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.10822 seconds with 10 queries