|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Who's the more problematic player? | |||
Arrington | 30 | 40.54% | |
Taylor | 44 | 59.46% | |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-13-2005, 09:08 PM | #46 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
i voted tayler as being the bigger problem. lavar is just venting some frustration because of his rehab not going the way it should. his 6.5 mill. dispute is being handled by the nflpa and is not talked about very much by lavar. ( lavar should have read through the contract, basically his own fault. )
taylor on the other hand needs to grow up. he played musical agents then signed a contract. he was busted for driving drunk, yea i know, he was cleared of charges but i think he prolly was a bit tipsy and should not have been driving. he allegedly spit on a player. he's not at work-outs, thats not a good decision. he wants to renegotiate his contract after only one season. ultimately though , i love both players. i just wish they could both do a better job at being more responsible and not blaming the skins for their own mistakes. just shut up and play football. |
Advertisements |
04-14-2005, 09:53 AM | #47 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
And I'm pretty sure Winslow signed after Taylor's deal was done. Didn't the Browns have a fairly tough time signing him, in part because he has the Postons? I seem to remember Winslow's negotiations dragging on longer than Taylors, but I could be wrong. Incidentally, in case anyone was interested, the best info I could find on Ed Reed's Contract was that he got a $3.625 million signing bonus in 2002 plus $275,000 in salary. 2003 he got $443,750. And this year he scheduled to make less than $600,000. He is in his final year of his rookie contract, and even after becoming Defensive MVP, he still hasn't demanded a new contract and he's never held out from all the information I was able to find. Now, Reed was drafted #24 in the 2002 draft, so certainly his contract should be less than Taylor's (inflation and higher draft position), but if ever there was a safety that could have legitimately demanded more $ than between $300k and $600k per year, it is Ed Reed. Again, I like Taylor, but I think we're being a little too easy on a kid who clearly has one heck of an attitude problem.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
|
04-14-2005, 09:59 AM | #48 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!" |
|
04-23-2005, 02:13 AM | #49 | |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
|
|
04-23-2005, 02:15 AM | #50 |
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 44
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Oh, and the guy who said Taylor didnt accomplish anything, he was an alternate to the pro-bowl as a rookie, and had better stats than Roy Williams across the board, who made the pro bowl. I'd say thats an accomplishment enough to make a statement.
|
04-23-2005, 02:44 AM | #51 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
|
|
04-23-2005, 07:38 PM | #52 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Is it a coincidence but both our problem children are from the University of Miami......
hmmmmmmmprrh.............. Skins 'N Canes...... you got some 'splaining to do..........
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
04-23-2005, 07:40 PM | #53 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
|
|
04-23-2005, 07:52 PM | #54 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
mea culpa mea culpa....................
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
04-23-2005, 07:59 PM | #55 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
To me Portis seems more like a clown, trying to be funny and entertaining all the time....as opposed to a "problem"...
|
04-23-2005, 08:06 PM | #56 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
04-23-2005, 08:14 PM | #57 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 55
Posts: 907
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
That said, I still love my Redskins and alway will, "in good times and bad".... |
|
04-23-2005, 08:17 PM | #58 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 2,029
|
Re: Arrington vs. Taylor: Who's the bigger "problem"?
Quote:
__________________
"It's absolutely criminal, in my opinion, that Monk has yet to be enshrined (in the Pro-Football Hall of Fame)" Dan Arkush PFW |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|