Pics For Sharing & Debating

[RedskinRat]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

I respect your faith in the scientific method.

I would say that the differences we're laboring under are largely semantic, you feel our belief in scientific method is 'faith'. I would assert that, due to the peer review and scientific method, it's a solid, proven process for all things.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

I would say that the differences we're laboring under are largely semantic, you feel our belief in scientific method is 'faith'. I would assert that, due to the peer review and scientific method, it's a solid, proven process for all things.

I agree that the scientific method is a "a solid, proven process". When something is proven through legitimate peer reviewed scientific process, I do not dispute its existence. The belief, however, that "all things" are discoverable through that process is an act of faith.

[That Guy]

and joe, there are entire fields of study devoted to perception and brain logic, but you'd probably want to ask them or google a subject matter expert for specifics instead of asking random people on a football forum how beauty is perceived or judged or similar like it's some sort of i-win button.

generally non-observable effects aren't assumed to exist. dark matter has never been observed, but is assumed due to otherwise unexplainable (but existing) observable mass.


but i don't know, what are you beliefs? intelligent design? 7 days of creation? the 1000 year old history of earth?

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by That Guy

and joe, there are entire fields of study devoted to perception and brain logic, but you'd probably want to ask them or google a subject matter expert for specifics instead of asking random people on a football forum how beauty is perceived or judged or similar like it's some sort of i-win button.

generally non-observable effects aren't assumed to exist. dark matter has never been observed, but is assumed due to otherwise unexplainable (but existing) observable mass.


but i don't know, what are you beliefs? intelligent design? 7 days of creation? the 1000 year old history of earth?

It is not and was not intended as an "I win" button. In that you see it as such, you are truly missing the point. Rather, it was intended to demonstrate the rhetorical point that a thing's existence is not tied to the ability to perceive it.

[RedskinRat]

MODS (not you, JR), could we please get a poll to see the god botherers Vs. smug elitist 'life-without-a-safety=net' types, please? Probably better if it's phrased 'Religious Vs. Non-Religious'.

I'll donate $20?

KTHANXBAI

[SmootSmack]

Where are the damn pictures. This thread ****ing sucks. I'm outta here

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Where are the damn pictures. This thread ****ing sucks. I'm outta here

Here you go.

[NC_Skins]

God is good.

[KLHJ2]

God is good, I would question the heart of the man who took this picture if he did not save the life of that child.

Even if you perceive this as evil and inhumane, please understand that God has offered the eternal kingdom to even those who are too young to believe in Him.

Do Children Who Die Go to Heaven? – John MacArthur Sermon | James' Mirror – Christian Discipleship Guide

It isn't how you die, or how you get in, its a matter of whether or not you get in.

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

God is good.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Here you go.

On that note

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Where are the damn pictures. This thread ****ing sucks. I'm outta here

this thread's motto:

1 picture is worth 1000 posts.

[JoeRedskin]

[JoeRedskin]

Georges Lemaître - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[JoeRedskin]

[JoeRedskin]