Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-15-2010, 05:23 PM   #46
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag359 View Post
I don't want to sign him simply because I don't want to feel obligated to keep his brother.
No worries dirt....the only time you have any obligations is when you are writing checks, to players that is. And I don't think that is your department.

I think Coach is gonna keep the best 53 that gives us the very best chance of winning no matter what your name plate says or how much you make, not who your brother is.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-15-2010, 06:04 PM   #47
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 4,495
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Redskin Insider:

Posted at 4:36 PM ET, 08/15/2010
Redskins remain interested in Brian Westbrook

The Redskins have been through their first preseason game and got a good look at young running backs Ryan Torain and Keiland Williams. But Coach Mike Shanahan said after Sunday's practice that the club remains interested in veteran free agent Brian Westbrook.

"Like I told you, I'm not sure what direction he's going," Shanahan said. "But we've been entertaining that option. I'm not sure what direction he's going at this time."

Shanahan said there is no timetable for action. ESPN's John Clayton suggested late last week that Westbrook was likely headed to St. Louis by Monday, a claim the Rams denied. St. Louis, though, is one team that has remained interested in pursuing the former Philadelphia Eagle throughout his free agency. Denver, another potential suitor because of a backfield decimated by injuries, last week signed veteran Justin Fargas.

The Redskins rushed for 140 yards on 41 carries in Friday night's 42-17 preseason victory over Buffalo. Torain (17 carries, 62 yards) and Williams (11 carries, 51 yards, two touchdowns) got the bulk of the work. Veteran Larry Johnson is scheduled to get his chance this Saturday against Baltimore, with fellow veteran free agent signee Willie Parker playing more the following week against the New York Jets.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2010, 11:34 PM   #48
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Yeah Westbrook, this season will be different...... this season your but will be healthy and sitting at home watching the games cause you failed to accept any of the offer's extended to you. lol.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 08:08 AM   #49
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

I just don't know why we would want Westbrook at this point. Torain and Williams seem perfectly capable and would give us the opportunity to get younger at the position while gaining valuable experience.

The only way I could see signing him would be if one of the other veterans craps out.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 08:25 AM   #50
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

It's possible that it is just a plot to make everyone work harder and stay on edge. If Shannahan makes everyone believe that he is still interested in Westbrook then they don't feel safe.

Honestly the only thing to gain with Westbrook is a 3rd down back but I'm sure that the other guys (Torrain and Williams) are pretty capable. I do not see Willie Parker making to the 53 man roster. Hell, he might be gone before then.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 10:34 AM   #51
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Today's the day we find out...from CSN's report this morning, it's between us and the Rams now...surprised that Denver is not in the talks anymore.

I don't think we need him, nor really want him now, at least not to carry the ball.

CP, LJ, Torain and Williams will be solid.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:25 AM   #52
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

There's some not that reliable information that with Coffee's retirement, the Niners have emerged as a last-second darkhorse for Westbrook.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:31 AM   #53
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

^not to mention the Saints are now looking for another RB.
NFL.com news: Hamilton's knee injury leaves Saints searching for backfield help
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:32 AM   #54
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Wouldn't be surprised if the 49ers stepped in. I'm thinking it really is just about money to the guy. Not even considering that point I don't think that our hand should be extended any longer.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:33 AM   #55
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Wonder if the Texans would be interested.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:34 AM   #56
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Throw Houston in the mix as well ... maybe.
NFL.com news: Rookie Tate's ankle injury adds to Texans' backfield questions
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:35 AM   #57
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

With all these injuries I wonder if we could offer up Parker to someone. But since he's the #4 back right now and the likelihood of him getting cut is high, doubt someone would give up very much, if anything, in return.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:38 AM   #58
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Wouldn't be surprised if the 49ers stepped in. I'm thinking it really is just about money to the guy. Not even considering that point I don't think that our hand should be extended any longer.
One would think he would use his noggin and realize someone his age is not going to get a huge contract plus adding his injury to the mix. Most older players want to go to a good team and will take less money so long as they have a chance at getting a ring before they retire. I can't imagine he's not thinking a long those lines. If he's holding out for money and accepts a ton of money from a bad team just for the money he'd be an idiot. Maybe he was just waiting to see how the Skins looked or played in the first preseason game before making a decision.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:40 AM   #59
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Doubt it's all about money at this point for BW, I think he's just waiting for the right situation more than anything. And skipping out on some of training camp probably isn't a bad bonus either.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2010, 11:49 AM   #60
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
re: Updated: 49ers Sign Brian Westbrook (update on Post #68)

Rams not optimistic:

Twitter / Brian Stull: On the subject of Brian We ...

The Canadian Press: Rams: Deal for running back Brian Westbrook not close


Shanahan still interested:

Redskins Insider - Redskins remain interested in Brian Westbrook


Apparently Denver is out too since they signed Justin Fargas last week.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.61436 seconds with 10 queries