Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why we need to rout for 2-14

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2009, 02:19 PM   #46
huntz
Special Teams
 
huntz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 67
Posts: 311
Thumbs down Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

The franchise has never lost more than 12 games in a single season. Worst season record was 1-12-1 in '61.
huntz is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-10-2009, 02:22 PM   #47
Son Of Man
Impact Rookie
 
Son Of Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 643
Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

I am a HUGE fan and will love the B&G until I die...howver, from a business standpoint, I have to look long-term and put my emotions aside. Therefore, I'm hoping for a top 3 pick (not 1st overall).
__________________
RG3 or bust!!!!!!!!!!
Son Of Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2009, 02:28 PM   #48
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Why we need to rout for 2-14

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
The worst thing about us going 2-14 this year is the fact that we're going 2-14 before we blow everything up and bring in new management, coaches, players...etc. So, after reading Smootsmack's thread on "Getting to know the Redskins' Front Office" I imagine that once we do blow up everything, we might as well expect another few win season next year unless the stars happen to align just nicely for us. I don't mind a 2-14 season when it's because the team is young and still trying to build and grow.

I just imagine despite whatever top draft picks we do get, it's going to be a long haul for us to get back to where we're all hoping the Redskins will be in a few years.
I would be fine if they did what the Caps did when they came out and said 'we're basically going to blow this team up, you're not going to like it but we'll be better off in the long run.' Thanks to good draft position they were able to select Backstrom, Ovechkin, Semin, and Alzner. A group that will eventually come full cirlcle and provide the foundation for the team along with other young players who were selected later in the early part of the draft like Varly, Carlson, and Green. On top of that they have seemingly random players that constantly step up, Flash comes to mind as of late. To me their success is attributed to a quality front office, not just the fact that they got lucky enough to select Ovechkin.

At the same time I'm scared that we could end up like the 49ers did under Mike Nolan. During that time they did all the right things including drafting young players, getting rid of Vinny, and cutting aging high priced veterans. Thats why I believe having quality talent elevaluators is easily the most important part of building a team.

Cerrato is mediocre at best, sure he can select a few good players, but at the same time he obviously has little idea, if any, as to how to build a team over the long haul opting for a "one player away approach, as I avoid adding quality prospects along the O-Line."

Adding Gibbs might be a nice touch but I'm convinced that he's only a great coach. I say this because despite a structure that wasn't the best at selecting talent, he was still able to lead the team to the playoffs twice in two years, and during that last run they seemed poised to take a run at the title, or as my Dad put it "no one wants to play them." Since Gibbs has left the team has lost the discipline and focus it had under his direction, which has resulted in the roster being exposed.

If I was in charge I would seriously consider cutting loose many of the high priced veterans during the uncapped year including Portis, Rabach, Griffin, ARE, DeAngelo Hall, I'd also be tempted to cut Andre Carter after this year. Fletcher can't be cut in my view because he's to much of a leader, playmaker, and overall high character player. Haynesworth has simply been dominant and will hopefully last and play hard enough to oversee a rebuilding effort.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40264 seconds with 10 queries