|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-10-2009, 05:01 PM | #46 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
i agree with your post. they should also move taylor over to the right side. make carter play the left side or draft/free agency a good left de, then they could do something different with carter. keeping carter on the right and taylor on the left would be a bad move.
__________________
Hail to Allen/Shanahan .... bring in some baby hogs and load up on diesel fuel !!! (budw38) |
|
Advertisements |
01-10-2009, 05:03 PM | #47 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
And I don't think they're trying to get extra picks with the intent on spending a high pick on a #1 WR. So I agree we still would need someone. If healthy, big if, Kelly should be a lock to be the #2 WR this year. Thomas, will be in that 3/4 range in 2009, depending on how much he advances this off-season and what happens with El. And Davis should be much more involved, I would think. You'll probably also hear rumors of Brandon Jones because of the Sherman Smith connection with Tennessee, I'm not buying those either.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
01-10-2009, 05:16 PM | #48 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
If we trade Moss, I'll be annoyed. Not because I don't think he's worth moving for a 2nd rounder, but because if we hadn't panicked and traded for Jason Taylor, we'd have a 2nd round pick to use without moving Moss.
__________________
Tardy |
|
01-10-2009, 05:19 PM | #49 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
Ironically, the Dolphins are one of our rumored trade partners. Though I don't think for Moss. But our first for their first and first of their two 2nd rounders is possible and could be great for us. I'd love it personally
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
01-10-2009, 09:54 PM | #50 |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
I would NOT trade Moss for a 2nd rounder.
Why, so we can draft another receiver and wait 3 years until he possibly becomes as good as Moss is now? Makes no sense to me. Moss is our only threat beyond 20 yards, he's just gotta catch the damn ball. The guy dropped more passes this year than Carlos. You can bring in another established receiver to replace Moss, but it doesn't make much sense from a cap perspective to take a $7M deadcap hit to come out even on the field. Then again we did take a $9M deadcap hit on the $9 Million Dollar Baby to bring Moss here, so it would be fitting to take another $7M hit on the way out... And Portis will cry and then what? |
01-10-2009, 10:25 PM | #51 |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
The question is how long can we expect to rely on this core group of guys?
Of the top 20 cap hits for the Skins in '09, 17 have played at least 7 seasons already (Landry, Cooley, Rogers are the others). How many more shots can Portis take? How many more years can Fletcher carry our defense? This is not a young group and it's not getting younger. The Skins have 2 choices IMO: 1. Play for 2010-2011 and make a REAL commitment to youth. Keep Landry, Campbell, Cooley, Rogers, Betts, and the recent draft picks - and jettison the rest. As Gary Oldman said in "The Professional": "EVERYONE!!!" Take the billion dollar deadcap hit in 2009 and set ourselves up with a new young core for 2010 and beyond. 2. Continue with the same strategy and try to make one more serious run with this group. Bring in free agent stopgaps to fill our holes on the lines and elsewhere and hope Campbell and our other young guys progress to the point that we can be serious NFC title contenders within the next 2-3 years. Hate to say it but after years of painful mediocrity, option 1 is starting to sound really good to me. But we all know the odds of option 2 are about 99.9%. |
01-10-2009, 10:57 PM | #52 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Staunton, VA
Posts: 1,261
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
With our current WR woes I do not see us getting rid of Moss. I do not think that would be a smart move at this juncture.
|
01-10-2009, 11:15 PM | #53 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
Of those 17, why does it have to be an immediate firesale? Option 1 seems kind of excessive. Can't we just gradually (over the course of 2 or 3 seasons) jettison those older large cap hits based on some hybrid formula of declining productivity and size of cap hit? Maybe that's kind of what you're suggesting in option two. I say sign stopgaps but make sure they're relatively young and be smart with their contracts, don't piss away draft picks for old and/or questionable talent, and continue to get younger through the draft.
__________________
Tardy |
|
01-11-2009, 12:30 AM | #54 | |
Serenity Now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
On the D, Griffin, Daniels and Washington might have to go this year. Springs is probably gone. Fletcher's played 11 seasons already so he's gonna need some real help real soon. Taylor is likely gone and/or only has a couple semi-productive seasons left in him. Andre Carter's entering his 9th season in 2009, not exactly a spring chicken. If you take out all the guys I mentioned in the next couple years what do we have left? And if you keep moving different guys in and out, it's really hard to build a cohesive core. Plus the Skins track record on trades in less than stellar to put it kindly. We always pay too much, and make dumb moves like spending a 2nd rounder for Taylor, only to trade a younger and more valuable Moss for that same 2nd rounder a year later... I kind of feel like flushing the system in 2009. Maybe we add a few select vets like Moss, Portis, Fletch, Samuels to option 1 and dump everyone else. Jansen, Thomas, Daniels, Springs, Taylor, Washington, Griffin, Smoot, Rabach all gone. If you're not looking like a solid contributor in 2010 I don't want you here. Eat a big chunk of deadcap this year and clean the books. Try to get as many picks as possible and let Zorn build the team he wants from the ground up. See which rookies stick and build from there. Spend the big money in a couple years when we're hopefully only a couple pieces away. Look I'm just speculating/venting. I'd be very surprised if we did a real housecleaning. But maybe a 4-12 regroup season would serve us best for the long term. |
|
01-11-2009, 11:41 AM | #55 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
01-11-2009, 11:45 AM | #56 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
They do make it crazy hard on themselves when they pay premium prices for mediocre talent though.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
01-11-2009, 11:54 AM | #57 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Personally I wouldn't cry over trading Moss.
I like him but he's not what you want out of a true #1 WR. I think JLC said it best so I'll just quote him: Quote:
|
|
01-11-2009, 10:11 PM | #58 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
It's the kind of move that can pay off in the long run. But trading him would leave us with no WR even remotely proven capable of handling a starting role, let alone a #1 role. We'd easily have the worst WR corps in the league. If the team made a move like this, it better be coupled with other house-cleaning moves like CC suggested. If you're going to choose the rebuild route, you gotta go all out for it and commit to the youth movement. I'd hate it if Moss were traded and then we went and kept Jason Taylor, something like that would make no sense. We'll see I suppose.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
01-12-2009, 08:43 AM | #59 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
Quote:
No doubt in my mind though that if they are able to get some 2nd round picks, with Moss being part of the leverage to get those, then you'll definitely hear a lot of buzz about the Redskins offering some package that includes a 1st this year or within the next three for Boldin.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
01-12-2009, 12:18 PM | #60 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Current Redskins Salary Cap Status - 2009
What "rumors" are there about santana moss being traded? Thus far, there have been no rumors about ANYONE on the skins roster being traded, unless you count JLC's speculation about Rogers. Even still, there have been no "rumors" about santana moss being traded that i'm aware of - just one fan's idle speculation. There's a huge difference between a legitimate rumor and speculation, even if it is "educated" speculation.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|