Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2006, 09:45 PM   #31
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskinhog1963 View Post
i think they need a good defensive end worse than they do a qb.the qb can sit back in the pocket and write a song unless a good de can put some pressure on him.i would almost give on of your right nuts to see julius peppers as a redskin,he's the real deal!
How did a QB fall into this equation? And you'd almost give one of my nuts?? My nuts aren't for sale or barter. I'm sure others would say the same about their nuts...except 724skinsfan 'cause he's weird like that
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 12-19-2006, 09:50 PM   #32
724Skinsfan
Playmaker
 
724Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
How did a QB fall into this equation? And you'd almost give one of my nuts?? My nuts aren't for sale or barter. I'm sure others would say the same about their nuts...except 724skinsfan 'cause he's weird like that
To think I was willing to remove you from my list....you're right, though.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn
724Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 10:01 PM   #33
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskinhog1963 View Post
i think they need a good defensive end worse than they do a qb.the qb can sit back in the pocket and write a song unless a good de can put some pressure on him.i would almost give on of your right nuts to see julius peppers as a redskin,he's the real deal!
Frank Gore has a better chance of running for 4000 yards next year (enter Rexi's analysis of how it could happen) than Peppers being in Burgandy and Gold within the next 5 years.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 10:05 PM   #34
Redskinhog1963
Special Teams
 
Redskinhog1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
Wink Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
How did a QB fall into this equation? And you'd almost give one of my nuts?? My nuts aren't for sale or barter. I'm sure others would say the same about their nuts...except 724skinsfan 'cause he's weird like that
keep your pants on man,it was just a joke.sorry you thought i gave you the raw ass over it!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo.
(ESPN QUOTE)
Redskinhog1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 10:13 PM   #35
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskinhog1963 View Post
keep your pants on man,it was just a joke.sorry you thought i gave you the raw ass over it!
I know. I was just joking back at you
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2006, 11:32 PM   #36
Redskinhog1963
Special Teams
 
Redskinhog1963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
Talking Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS View Post
I know. I was just joking back at you
okay my friend!but i would still give one of somebody's nuts for julius peppers though.maybe not yours or mine,but somebody's!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo.
(ESPN QUOTE)
Redskinhog1963 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 12:28 AM   #37
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
thomas is a little older than i thought. a 270 lbs OLB in a 3-4 defense, who will be 30 by next season's start might not be the best choice to be a 4-3 linebacker in our system, and probably wouldnt be that wise to spend too much on him at this point. if we go after a 30+ linebacker id hope it would be london fletcher
Signing a 30 year old to a big deal would be stupid...and that position is not even the biggest need. Clements I have no problem with.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 10:59 AM   #38
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

I think Thomas is just speculation on Lenny's part, he doesn't seem like a great fit here.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 01:29 PM   #39
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

I'd rather sign Asante Samuel to address our cornerback needs. He's younger and has more picks. I just think he's in the upswing of his career while Clements is on his way down.
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 01:32 PM   #40
JDALY27
Special Teams
 
JDALY27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citizens for 81 View Post
I'd be for signing Clements, moving springs to safety, and drafting A. Branch.

Merry X-mass

Totally! Move Springs to Safety to work with Taylor. Clements and Rogers on the corner.........good call guy!!
JDALY27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 01:35 PM   #41
Bill B
Impact Rookie
 
Bill B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?

If the Redskins go after and sign Clements will the team ask Springs to redo his contract or cut him?
Bill B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 01:37 PM   #42
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theJBexperience View Post
I'd rather sign Asante Samuel to address our cornerback needs. He's younger and has more picks. I just think he's in the upswing of his career while Clements is on his way down.
I like Samuel but I think the problem is that physically he doesn't fit the GWilliams mold for a DB
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 01:41 PM   #43
theJBexperience
Impact Rookie
 
theJBexperience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?

We passed on Dyson because of that too. So, we sign Kenny Wright who does fit the GW bill. And how has that worked out for us? It's stupid to pass on these talented guys because they're not as sure tacklers. They're playmakers who get INTs. We need them especially since we may break the season record for least amount of picks.
theJBexperience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 02:06 PM   #44
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
Re: Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill B View Post
If the Redskins go after and sign Clements will the team ask Springs to redo his contract or cut him?
From a salary cap standpoint, they have no motivation to cut Shawn Springs. If he's under contract, he'll count $7.3 million in 2007. If they cut him before June 1, he'd count $7.4 million in deadcap. So if they were going to cut Springs, it would be because they didn't think he fit the squad anymore. But they could save cap space by asking him to restructure his deal. He'd still get paid what his contract says, he'd just get it in the form of a lumpsum signing bonus instead of in game checks.

There's no reason to ask him to take a paycut. On the open market he's worth what his contract is scheduled to pay him.

All that aside, I think he's still a valuable player for us. He's still our best corner. If Clements came on board and Springs were healthy, they'd both be starters.

One of the biggest questions the defensive coaches will have to ask themselves is can we play top 10 defense again with Springs and Rogers as our starters, or do we need to get a top guy to pair with Springs? We know that K Wright probably isn't cutting it as a nickel. So the question is do the Skins go after a young CB to play nickel initially and eventually take over for Springs? Or do we need a stud right now because Rogers just won't cut it? I don't know the answer at this point - Rogers has quietly had a much better second half of the season.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 02:11 PM   #45
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I don't know the answer at this point - Rogers has quietly had a much better second half of the season.
I don't think it's a coincidence that Springs has played much of the second half of the season. I also imagine benching Archuleta factored into helping Rogers
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.89159 seconds with 10 queries