|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-19-2006, 09:45 PM | #31 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
How did a QB fall into this equation? And you'd almost give one of my nuts?? My nuts aren't for sale or barter. I'm sure others would say the same about their nuts...except 724skinsfan 'cause he's weird like that
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Advertisements |
12-19-2006, 09:50 PM | #32 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 3,508
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
To think I was willing to remove you from my list....you're right, though.
__________________
"I hope I'm getting better. I hope you haven't seen my best." - Jim Zorn |
12-19-2006, 10:01 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
Frank Gore has a better chance of running for 4000 yards next year (enter Rexi's analysis of how it could happen) than Peppers being in Burgandy and Gold within the next 5 years.
|
12-19-2006, 10:05 PM | #34 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
keep your pants on man,it was just a joke.sorry you thought i gave you the raw ass over it!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo. (ESPN QUOTE) |
12-19-2006, 10:13 PM | #35 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
I know. I was just joking back at you
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
12-19-2006, 11:32 PM | #36 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: somewhere on this planet
Age: 61
Posts: 178
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
okay my friend!but i would still give one of somebody's nuts for julius peppers though.maybe not yours or mine,but somebody's!
__________________
Parcells' legacy with the Cowboys can be framed this way: Instead of joining Tom Landry, Jimmy Johnson and Barry Switzer as coaches who led them to championships, he leaves lumped with Chan Gailey and Dave Campo. (ESPN QUOTE) |
12-20-2006, 12:28 AM | #37 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
Quote:
__________________
Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub |
|
12-20-2006, 10:59 AM | #38 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
I think Thomas is just speculation on Lenny's part, he doesn't seem like a great fit here.
|
12-20-2006, 01:29 PM | #39 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
I'd rather sign Asante Samuel to address our cornerback needs. He's younger and has more picks. I just think he's in the upswing of his career while Clements is on his way down.
|
12-20-2006, 01:32 PM | #40 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Age: 45
Posts: 271
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
|
12-20-2006, 01:35 PM | #41 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 721
|
Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?
If the Redskins go after and sign Clements will the team ask Springs to redo his contract or cut him?
|
12-20-2006, 01:37 PM | #42 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
I like Samuel but I think the problem is that physically he doesn't fit the GWilliams mold for a DB
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
12-20-2006, 01:41 PM | #43 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: ESPN: Nate Clements in Redskins' plans?
We passed on Dyson because of that too. So, we sign Kenny Wright who does fit the GW bill. And how has that worked out for us? It's stupid to pass on these talented guys because they're not as sure tacklers. They're playmakers who get INTs. We need them especially since we may break the season record for least amount of picks.
|
12-20-2006, 02:06 PM | #44 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,421
|
Re: Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?
Quote:
There's no reason to ask him to take a paycut. On the open market he's worth what his contract is scheduled to pay him. All that aside, I think he's still a valuable player for us. He's still our best corner. If Clements came on board and Springs were healthy, they'd both be starters. One of the biggest questions the defensive coaches will have to ask themselves is can we play top 10 defense again with Springs and Rogers as our starters, or do we need to get a top guy to pair with Springs? We know that K Wright probably isn't cutting it as a nickel. So the question is do the Skins go after a young CB to play nickel initially and eventually take over for Springs? Or do we need a stud right now because Rogers just won't cut it? I don't know the answer at this point - Rogers has quietly had a much better second half of the season.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
12-20-2006, 02:11 PM | #45 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Will Springs have to rework contract if Clements is signed?
I don't think it's a coincidence that Springs has played much of the second half of the season. I also imagine benching Archuleta factored into helping Rogers
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|