The Argument for Team Chemistry?

TheMalcolmConnection · 03-14-2006, 11:14 AM

I would have to say they'll be better, just barely competitive. Still, they have an aging Warner and no offensive line with which to protect him OR Edge.

That Guy · 03-14-2006, 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PWNED

so are you feeling the cardinals who were the pick last year will step up this year?

i said so a couple posts ago (and browns next year). I DON'T mean gauranteed playoffs or anything like that. but they got a RB now and the defense will get berry back (and the D's problem's were mental, not really lack of talent). OL still suspect.

PWNED · 03-14-2006, 11:19 AM

i think ferguson would be a good start for them. at least give edge a side to run to. it would have been a good move by THEN to have signed hutch.

03-14-2006, 11:14 AM	#31
TheMalcolmConnection I like big (_\|_)s. Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Lexington, Virginia Age: 43 Posts: 19,225	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? I would have to say they'll be better, just barely competitive. Still, they have an aging Warner and no offensive line with which to protect him OR Edge. __________________ Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.

03-14-2006, 11:19 AM	#33
PWNED The Starter Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111 Age: 32 Posts: 1,160	Re: The Argument for Team Chemistry? i think ferguson would be a good start for them. at least give edge a side to run to. it would have been a good move by THEN to have signed hutch. __________________ 143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

The Argument for Team Chemistry?

Locker Room Main Forum