Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Laron Landry = Lavar?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2011, 12:50 PM   #16
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

I wonder what our situation would be right now had we gone with Bruce Allen's preferred choice and taken Eric Berry instead of Trent Williams
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-02-2011, 01:14 PM   #17
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Yeah he's wildly inconsistent, talks way too much ish, is borderline dirty, and the years keep passing while we wait for him to be an elite safety. I don't think he's really healthy right now, but aside from the first half of last year, we have yet to see him rise to the level we hoped for when we made him a top 10 pick.

All that said, I still think we'll re-sign him. Our secondary is doggy doo doo. I know he's a liability in coverage at times, but the back 4 is worse without him.
To make matters worse, we don't have anyone who is really good at coverage. LL would be fine if we had at least one really good coverage corner. As it is, our coverage is pretty much smoke and mirrors with everyone back there needing to work perfectly together. We can play a defense to his strengths b/c we have no one to make up for his weaknesses.

As Matty said, however, the blame for our D isn't LL's issues - it's the lack of one really good cover guy.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:21 PM   #18
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

LaRon is a LB who's fast, just like Polamalu. He's good and worth investing in.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:23 PM   #19
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
Totally correct. REED DOUGHTY is more of a solid player.
there goes the neighborhood
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:34 PM   #20
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattyk View Post
there goes the neighborhood
lol
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:45 PM   #21
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
there goes the neighborhood
"There goes the neighborhood". Funny.

You must like Laron's big muscles. Or is it the way he flies thru the air with a swing and a miss? But big muscles are impressive to some. Reed can tackle better than Laron. Laron should be more solid. He has the tools. But he hasn't proved it. He sure talks a good game after the other team gets a first down and we are behind big time and he happens to be in on the tackle. There is a reason Reed is on the team playing. He has heart and doesn't talk stupid chit at the wrong time. See link below for Laron's solid play.



Washington Redskins' LaRon Landry Needs to Learn How to Tackle | Bleacher Report

Last edited by Sonny9TD; 11-02-2011 at 01:59 PM.
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:48 PM   #22
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
To make matters worse, we don't have anyone who is really good at coverage. LL would be fine if we had at least one really good coverage corner. As it is, our coverage is pretty much smoke and mirrors with everyone back there needing to work perfectly together. We can play a defense to his strengths b/c we have no one to make up for his weaknesses.

As Matty said, however, the blame for our D isn't LL's issues - it's the lack of one really good cover guy.
He didn't say that you did. You're just kissing tail. And the reason for the defense woes is not the lack of one good cover guy. That's the reason we can't stop the run? It's a lack of discipline. Just ask London Fletcher after chewing out Laron. LOL

Last edited by Sonny9TD; 11-02-2011 at 02:01 PM.
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 01:48 PM   #23
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
Don't know if that's directed at me, I can see how it appears I'm blaming Landry for a bigger problem. When coaches look to address a problem, personel is obviously a major part, so I'm just pointing out that LL may be part of the problem, not the whole problem itself.
It really wasn't, because this is the first time this season I hear a complaint about Landry. I think though that it is a concern when a player like Landry (who is supposed to be our best player on defense) is faltering. I always hear people during games complain about either Doughty or Hall, and feel that they are the only ones screwing up. When it seems that the entire defensive backs unit is having issues, and not just one guy.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:01 PM   #24
freddyg12
Playmaker
 
freddyg12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
It really wasn't, because this is the first time this season I hear a complaint about Landry. I think though that it is a concern when a player like Landry (who is supposed to be our best player on defense) is faltering. I always hear people during games complain about either Doughty or Hall, and feel that they are the only ones screwing up. When it seems that the entire defensive backs unit is having issues, and not just one guy.
As someone mentioned earlier, the expectation is greater of LL. I agree w/that & that makes sense since each player has his a different contract & thus different level of investment from the team.

I'm not just complaining about LL per se as much as I am questioning his overall value & impact. If all we do is say, this guy (e.g. Landry) is better than that guy (e.g. Barnes), there's not much interesting to debate. I'm posing the question as to whether LL is affecting the unit's chemistry. I don't know, but take a look at our results since his return.
freddyg12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:01 PM   #25
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
He didn't say that you did. You're just kissing tail. And the reason for the defense woes is not the lack of one good cover guy. That's the reason we get ran on? LOL
I kiss nobody's tail. Matty's quote was:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I agree. Seems a little too nit-picky to me to start singling out individuals when the unit as a whole is struggling and needs to pick it up. Seems like whenever the D struggles it's always Hall or Landry's fault.
Which indicated to me that he was not blaming LL at this point, which I agree with and with which my statement was entirely consistent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
As Matty said, however, the blame for our D isn't LL's issues - it's the lack of one really good cover guy.
I should have clarified that I was speaking of the passing D - but, yes, as to that, I think that having one true cover corner would radically improve the rest of our pass defense. Right now, in our pass D, we can't take any one receiver - whether it be a WR, RB or TE - out of the game by assigning a single person to cover them. This isn't applicable to just the league's top receivers, I would suggest it is applicable to every team's top receiver. In light of that, Landry, whose coverage is based on athleticism and closing speed as opposed to anticipation and ball awareness, is forced into playing away from his strengths.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:02 PM   #26
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by freddyg12 View Post
As someone mentioned earlier, the expectation is greater of LL. I agree w/that & that makes sense since each player has his a different contract & thus different level of investment from the team.

I'm not just complaining about LL per se as much as I am questioning his overall value & impact. If all we do is say, this guy (e.g. Landry) is better than that guy (e.g. Barnes), there's not much interesting to debate. I'm posing the question as to whether LL is affecting the unit's chemistry. I don't know, but take a look at our results since his return.
Not that I know everything but good point.
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:04 PM   #27
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

I should have clarified that I was speaking of the passing D - but, yes, as to that, I think that having one true cover corner would radically improve the rest of our pass defense. Right now, in our pass D, we can't take any one receiver - whether it be a WR, RB or TE - out of the game by assigning a single person to cover them. This isn't applicable to just the league's top receivers, I would suggest it is applicable to every team's top receiver. In light of that, Landry, whose coverage is based on athleticism and closing speed as opposed to anticipation and ball awareness, is forced into playing away from his strengths.[/QUOTE]

You make some good points there.
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:09 PM   #28
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
Totally correct. REED DOUGHTY is more of a solid player.
Let's not go overboard.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:10 PM   #29
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonny9TD View Post
Totally correct. REED DOUGHTY is more of a solid player.
Holy Crap! You're serious. I thought you were joking with the Reed Doughty sh**. LOLOLOL

Reed Doughty is a great guy and certainly gives it his all. I love the guy. Unfortunately, his "all" is about 75% of LL's "Just barely trying". RD is simply LL with out LL's speed. RD has zero ball skills, his anticipation is about the same as LL and he simply doesn't have the speed to make up ground like LL does.

He may have better technique at times but, if you are suggesting that RD should start ahead of LL - well, that's just crazy talk. LL has his faults, but LL and his warts are better than RD at the top of his game. RD, great guy that he is, is a back up on this or any other team.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2011, 02:12 PM   #30
Sonny9TD
Registered User
 
Sonny9TD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Let's not go overboard.
Do you really think Laron is playing better? Seriously
Sonny9TD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26872 seconds with 10 queries