|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: How would you evaluate the playcalling this season? | |||
It stinks | 23 | 63.89% | |
It's the players, not the playcalling; Gibbs shouldn't change the playcalling | 13 | 36.11% | |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-21-2004, 09:01 PM | #16 |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Even if we used shotgun it wouldn't work. Our QB would get killed.
|
Advertisements |
11-21-2004, 09:04 PM | #17 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
|
That penalty orgy starting at the 10 yard line didn't help the situation either.
|
11-21-2004, 09:45 PM | #18 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
11-21-2004, 10:13 PM | #19 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Is it just me, or did pass protection look good today? Ramsey (aka mini-Bledsoe) got sacked once. So what's up with all the criticism of the O-line (aside from penalties)?
|
11-21-2004, 10:26 PM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
I'm sorry but what is up with "hey Gibbs, you need a new playbook"
While I understand not following a coach (or Quarterback) blindly, us LONG time Redskins fans happen to know what Joe Gibbs is capable of doing for this team and those who are buying into the media bandwagon that the game has passed him by know absolutely nothing about football. |
11-21-2004, 10:28 PM | #21 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Quote:
Just just can't win, LOL. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. For every situation there will always be someone to second guess it. |
|
11-21-2004, 10:29 PM | #22 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LaVale MD
Age: 62
Posts: 515
|
Quote:
|
|
11-21-2004, 10:31 PM | #23 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Quote:
Aside from the penalties? Like that wasn't a big deal? How many penalties did the line have today? It was quite a few. |
|
11-21-2004, 10:32 PM | #24 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Gibbs was trying to establish a ball controlled game plan that would feature our best offensive player, Portis, while keeping the Eagles' offense OFF the field. Seems like a wiser game plan to me. If we took more shots downfield (which a few more than maybe we have had) then you could be looking at more three and outs and less time of possession...which giving it to the Eagles O more is just not smart.
|
11-21-2004, 10:34 PM | #25 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
There were several false starts....
|
11-21-2004, 10:34 PM | #26 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Hey Skinsguy,
1. I am a LONG time Redskins fan 2. We haven't scored 20 points yet 3. We haven't scored so few points per game since the 1930s! *FYI - FDR was the President then I've been pretty reasonable in my assessments of Gibbs. I've said and still say that he will turn this team around. I've said that the game hasn't passed Gibbs by. I've said he's a great man and he has a brilliant mind. But excuse me if I criticize him. Have you been watching our offense? It has NEVER looked this bad (at least in my 26 years of existence). The playcalling is awful. Do you disagree? If you think the playcalling has been good, we should just agree to disagree because there is no common ground between the two of us. |
11-21-2004, 10:36 PM | #27 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
|
|
11-21-2004, 10:37 PM | #28 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
The playcalling was dreadful and, IMO, that was the #1 (although not the only) reason why we lost. |
|
11-21-2004, 10:40 PM | #29 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
But, we're not 7-3 - hence the criticism. |
|
11-21-2004, 10:41 PM | #30 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Quote:
There were many people and a couple of threads talking about how we should have pounded it against Cincy last week. We tried to come out throwing and before we knew it the score was 14-0. This week we had a stronger commitment to running and kept the game close for a good portion of it. I still say this game came down to execution. We had a few breakdowns at key times that really cost us the game. Could the offense have been a bit more wide open? Yeah I agree it could have, but for the most part it was a solid gameplan that kept us in the game, and it was poor execution that led to our 2nd half collapse. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|