Josh Rosen Trade Rumors: Redskins Have 'Openly' Discussed QB If Made Available

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

The Giants brass met with Hastings as well. Is that also a seal/done deal?

Haskins?

No but AZ is 90% I'd say.

[BigHairedAristocrat]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Like we have all mentioned , it doesn't matter who is the QB if this team doesn't improve the WR position. I'd also expect AZ to get less now, seeing as though everyone knows they don't want Rosen.

one could also say it doesn't matter who the WRs are if we don't improve the QB position.

Also, its quite the opposite on Rosen. Per Sheehan, multiple teams are interested, so competition will move the price up. and even if there was only one team interested, the Cards would be foolish to trade him for less than a 2nd. He's more valuable to them as a backup than the 3rd round or later compensation that was previously speculated.

[VTSkins1961]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

one could also say it doesn't matter who the WRs are if we don't improve the QB position.

Also, its quite the opposite on Rosen. Per Sheehan, multiple teams are interested, so competition will move the price up. and even if there was only one team interested, the Cards would be foolish to trade him for less than a 2nd. He's more valuable to them as a backup than the 3rd round or later compensation that was previously speculated.

I would give a 2nd or a 1st for him or I would stay put and draft Jones or Lock

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by VTSkins1961

I would give a 2nd or a 1st for him or I would stay put and draft Jones or Lock

No way in he I give a first for him

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat

Also, its quite the opposite on Rosen.

He's more valuable to them as a backup than the 3rd round or later compensation that was previously speculated.

Now I am confused, I thought the Cardinals were moving on from Rosen because he didn't fit the new coach's offense. If that is the case why keep him as a back up? You want a plug & play back up that can run the offense the starter did, not one you have to alter the offense for.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Haskins?

No but AZ is 90% I'd say.

There is much talk of Rosen to NY for their third round pick.

[MTK]

If multiple teams are interested it's going to take more than a 3rd.

[rocnrik]

I would rather have Drew lock than Rosen... think about it the Cards were the worst team last year and have given up on a QB in one year.. I don’t like Rosen at all .. not even for a 3rd .. Lock for me!

[MTK]

They're not giving up on Rosen as much as it's about a new coach taking over and he has the chance to take "his guy".

[skinsfaninok]

If it's more than a 2 I'm out on Rosen, I'd rather just roll with Keenum for the yr. Haskins won't be there at 15 and I don't want to mortgage the future for him (2012).

[MTK]

I won't be surprised if someone gives up a 1st rd pick for Rosen. Teams basically have to put him on their draft board and evaluate him as if he's just coming out. The Giants with 1.17 could be in play.

[skinsfaninok]

If this would happen, I'm out

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

If this would happen, I'm out

That's ridiculous

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by MTK

That's ridiculous

Yeah we need a QB but not this bad, and Haskins is no Andrew Luck - Manning. U would have no fans show to games for sure if this happened

[htownskinfan]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

If it's more than a 2 I'm out on Rosen, I'd rather just roll with Keenum for the yr. Haskins won't be there at 15 and I don't want to mortgage the future for him (2012).

Yep,that's why I cant vote in the poll,how can you vote yes or no when you dont know what the terms are?