Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-07-2010, 04:41 PM   #196
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Tony Kornheiser? Like he ever talks sports.
yeah i wish they would put another show on. he hates talkin sports anymore.

the day after the skins jets game, his show came on, he said he didnt watch one snap of the game. he then went on to talk about some political social issue with a guest call in.

just a horrible show and completely wrong format for a sports radio station.
__________________
Life is brutal, but beautiful
over the mountain is offline  

Advertisements
Old 09-07-2010, 04:41 PM   #197
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slingin Sammy 33 View Post
I'm concerned about our run D with AH. He can only play one position on the DL, either NT or DE. Kemo hasn't looked particularly good at NT and our DEs are average at best (Carriker, Daniels, Holliday). Golston is a high motor guy, but an overachiever and not an NFL starter IMO. We also have major issues in the run game at OLB. Anyone who thinks we're making a deep playoff run this year is sadly mistaken. If we get in as a wild card the season will be a huge success.

Does AH make this year's D better? If he's on the field, doesn't have a phantom injury, and isn't half-assing it every other play, he makes this year's D better. But, does anyone actually expect him to be here long-term....I certainly hope not. We have to face facts, we've got a bad apple and we're not getting any more than a 2nd for him, if we can get that. But a 2nd is better than nothing and we should be able to pick up a quality DL in next year's draft with that pick.

Rome wasn't built in one off-season.
We also have to rectify this knowing that given the current roster (read: age + salary structure), the 2011 team almost certainly won't be as good as the 2010 team.

There are plenty of things a team can do in the offseason to better its long term and short term fortunes. But the only thing a team can do to completely change the outlook of it's organization in a year is have an other worldly (better than 98% of all other) draft class. And we're already down two picks and retained only 2 players (plus 3 UDFAs) from this class.

So while it's about 11 months too early to have an accurate prediction for next year's Redskins (or even if there will be a next year's Redskins), it's worth pointing out that any move we make that hurts our chances to win this year is doing so at the expense of next year's team as well.

To be clear, I'm not saying that the 2011 team can't win. They can: but only if we ALREADY have the right balance of players to be successful now and in the future. If we cut Albert Haynesworth and have a poor rushing defense with limited pass rush, there's no silver lining. There's just decreased quality of defense going forward.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:03 PM   #198
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

unless we get a second and a 5th, or something around a 3rd and a 4th, or a 3rd and an average receiver (which would become our #2 WR), then I say this deal doesn't get done.

I am actually a little frustrated with how the Chargers won't even field teams inquiring about VJ for less than a second and a third. Its ridiculous.
Mechanix544 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:16 PM   #199
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Honestly he kinda scares me in the 3-4 with how undisciplined he plays. And there have been whispers from some players that they're concerned about him too.
Shanahan spoke to that particular issue on his show on NBC with Larry Michael and Lindsay Czarnaik. He's afraid his undisciplined play will create holes in the defense that will allow runners to rip-off long gains by being out of position.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:20 PM   #200
Slingin Sammy 33
Playmaker
 
Slingin Sammy 33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
We also have to rectify this knowing that given the current roster (read: age + salary structure), the 2011 team almost certainly won't be as good as the 2010 team.
Our 2010 front three (save for Carriker if he has a solid year) won't look anything like our 2011 front three. That doesn't necessarily mean it won't be as good.

Quote:
There are plenty of things a team can do in the offseason to better its long term and short term fortunes. But the only thing a team can do to completely change the outlook of it's organization in a year is have an other worldly (better than 98% of all other) draft class. And we're already down two picks and retained only 2 players (plus 3 UDFAs) from this class.
I know our 3rd & 4th are gone, but didn't we pick up a 5th (J. Brown) and 7th (Tryon). There doesn't appear to be much in the 2011 draft at NT, but a few good 3-4 DEs should be available when we pick in the 1st.

Quote:
So while it's about 11 months too early to have an accurate prediction for next year's Redskins (or even if there will be a next year's Redskins), it's worth pointing out that any move we make that hurts our chances to win this year is doing so at the expense of next year's team as well.
Not if it means getting rid of AH, who at this point appears to be resigned to being an unproductive @ss-hole (AH) for 2010. If we can pick up a 2nd for the guy I don't see how that hurts us. Did you see AH staying with us and being productive in 2011? I sure don't.

Quote:
To be clear, I'm not saying that the 2011 team can't win. They can: but only if we ALREADY have the right balance of players to be successful now and in the future. If we cut Albert Haynesworth and have a poor rushing defense with limited pass rush, there's no silver lining. There's just decreased quality of defense going forward.
No way do I advocate cutting AH, only a trade for something in the area of a 2nd rounder. The 2011 team should be positioned to win, even while getting rid of AH. Our secondary is young and should improve over the course of the year. Fletch shoud still be productive in 2011, the rest of the LBs appear solid, providing Orakpo matures at the 3-4 OLB spot (if not, he's got trade value to a team playing a 4-3 and needing an RDE). The place we need to shore up is the front three and there are some good 3-4 DL coming up as FAs in 2011 also.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.
Slingin Sammy 33 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:25 PM   #201
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechanix544 View Post
unless we get a second and a 5th, or something around a 3rd and a 4th, or a 3rd and an average receiver (which would become our #2 WR), then I say this deal doesn't get done.

I am actually a little frustrated with how the Chargers won't even field teams inquiring about VJ for less than a second and a third. Its ridiculous.
The FO there is known for taking a stand at driving a hard bargain. It' the way they customarily do business.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised.
Longtimefan is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:30 PM   #202
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
Honestly he kinda scares me in the 3-4 with how undisciplined he plays. And there have been whispers from some players that they're concerned about him too.
Recent whispers or are we talking about the Fletcher/Daniels comments about from last year?
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:31 PM   #203
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
We also have to rectify this knowing that given the current roster (read: age + salary structure), the 2011 team almost certainly won't be as good as the 2010 team.

There are plenty of things a team can do in the offseason to better its long term and short term fortunes. But the only thing a team can do to completely change the outlook of it's organization in a year is have an other worldly (better than 98% of all other) draft class. And we're already down two picks and retained only 2 players (plus 3 UDFAs) from this class.

So while it's about 11 months too early to have an accurate prediction for next year's Redskins (or even if there will be a next year's Redskins), it's worth pointing out that any move we make that hurts our chances to win this year is doing so at the expense of next year's team as well.

To be clear, I'm not saying that the 2011 team can't win. They can: but only if we ALREADY have the right balance of players to be successful now and in the future. If we cut Albert Haynesworth and have a poor rushing defense with limited pass rush, there's no silver lining. There's just decreased quality of defense going forward.


the run defense may be poor with or without him. but to me this is why the front office MUST get something in return. they simply can't let the guy walk w/out compensation.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:43 PM   #204
VTSKINS61
Camp Scrub
 
VTSKINS61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

I would not cut him. I'd trade ONLY for at least a 2'nd and a 5'th or a player and a 4'th or 5'th. If I couldn't get that for I'd deactivate his fat butt every game and ruin the rest of his career.
VTSKINS61 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 05:57 PM   #205
CrustyRedskin
Playmaker
 
CrustyRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,059
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTSKINS61 View Post
I would not cut him. I'd trade ONLY for at least a 2'nd and a 5'th or a player and a 4'th or 5'th. If I couldn't get that for I'd deactivate his fat butt every game and ruin the rest of his career.

I like that idea!!! Or trade him to another team for something like a thirty pack of beer!!!! Or a $25 gift card to Chilis!!!LMAO
CrustyRedskin is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 06:00 PM   #206
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,749
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTSKINS61 View Post
I would not cut him. I'd trade ONLY for at least a 2'nd and a 5'th or a player and a 4'th or 5'th. If I couldn't get that for I'd deactivate his fat butt every game and ruin the rest of his career.
For a seventh post, you show a lot of maturity. Welcome aboard.
Defensewins is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 06:11 PM   #207
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longtimefan View Post
Shanahan spoke to that particular issue on his show on NBC with Larry Michael and Lindsay Czarnaik. He's afraid his undisciplined play will create holes in the defense that will allow runners to rip-off long gains by being out of position.
You mean MORE holes than the ones which were there in the preseason every time AH decided to do his own thing?

AH is in many ways a very talented liability.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 06:28 PM   #208
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

TRADE HIM FOR RANDY MOSS WHO ACCORDING TO YAHOO "feels un-wanted"

Randy Moss feels 'unwanted' in New England - Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 06:38 PM   #209
Shanetrn1
Camp Scrub
 
Shanetrn1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

i don't think Shanahan would deal him if he didn't think we could still win without him, Landry will play SS but he will in the box a lot almost as another LB i think we can stop the run, and i think we will have a strong pass rush considering Orakpo will be Blitzed a lot more with will do a couple things, 1 it could expose carter as a bad coverage man and the QB could just check to his man, or Orakpo disrupts the QB enough he throws an inaccurate pass.
Shanetrn1 is offline  
Old 09-07-2010, 07:01 PM   #210
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Redskins and Titans talking trade again on Albert Haynesworth

No frigging way. We need draft picks period. Ship Fat Albert back to Tenn for a first rounder and a second or at least 2 second rounders minimum. We can use this opportunity to get draft picks back!!!!! I rather wait a year and draft a top WR than get VJ. The Draftee will work harder to prove he belongs and will be younger. Hopefully we don't get a prime dona though.
GusFrerotte is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.62066 seconds with 10 queries