![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#166 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#167 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#168 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 38
Posts: 5,413
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Kyle blows. and yes Houston was kubiak. not Kyle
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#169 |
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Unaccustomed as I am to being part of the optimism faction here, let me give this a try...
A large part of the distress that folks here are expressing in completely unambiguous terms comes from the fact that those same folks allowed themselves to harbor unrealistic expectations in the past. Let me give a few examples: Jamaal Brown: When he signed on here, there was euphoria because the Skins got a Pro Bowl caliber tackle to play opposite the #4 pick in the draft at the other tackle and as soon as Brown worked out the kinks from an injury he would resume that level of play and even surpass it. Those two were going to make Redskin fans forget about Lachey and Jacoby as offensive tackles. Excuse me, Jamaal Brown had a good year on a very good team and received more accolades than his play on the field merited; then he got hurt; then the Redskins signed a hurt player with exaggerated press clippings. Today we have folks saying he sucks. Actually, he never returned to the level he had achieved prior to his injury; he does not suck; he is merely average to slightly below average for an OT. LaRon Landry: People love his big highlight reel head shots. Trouble is, that is all he has in his game bag. He has NEVER been able to cover a turtle with a mattress blanket; he spends waaay too much time chasing someone who has the ball into the end zone. (Remember DeSean Jackson on Play One of the 59-28 debacle last year...?) He has never been held accountable for giving up big plays as a safety so all he does is continue to do the only thing he knows how to do - - make the highlight reel with a headshot. That is your "safety"; he is the guy who gives up TDs when he makes a mistake; he makes lots of mistakes. But it is the fanbase who has adored him for his big hits who feels the pain because they expect him to actually be an effective safety and he is not. [By the way, isn't this Landry's contract year? I think it is. Right now, would you give him a "payday" and a 5-year deal? I would not.] THE QUARTERBACKS: When Mike Shanahan was hired fans went overboard on his "offensive genius" credentials. Make no mistake, Mike Shanahan has a good offensive mind, but a large component of his "genius reputation" comes from having Steve Young as his QB in SF and John Elway as his QB in Denver. He did not pick either one; he did not groom either one; he designed plays those guys could execute to beat the other team. He had no QB when he got here; he tried to get one and it did not work; he now has two guys who would need to improve to become journeymen. It isn't their fault they aren't stars; it isn't Mike Shanahan's either. Fans expected waaay too much from day one. By the way, the last true "Franchise QB" the Redskins had was Sonny Jurgensen. Sonny is in his 70s now; nevertheless, if he had six weeks to prepare and get his arm loose, he might be able to match either of the current dudes in one of those QB Skills Contests... Kyle Shanahan: He got the OC job in Houston because Gary Kubiak had been Mike Shanahan's OC in Denver since forever and there Kyle had a better-than-average QB and a STUD WR to play with. Fans bought into the Kyle-hype; he had accomplished good things in Houston; he had the "Shanahan genes"; he would work magic. Right now, he is underachieving even considering the limited talent he has to work with here to the point that I am not sure he would be able to get another OC position in the NFL if Dad were to can his butt at the end of this season. BTW, that is one of the best arguments to demonstrate why nepotism is always a bad idea... Ryan Torrain: He never was much of an all-around back. He had two good games and fans gave him a nickname and started predicting 1500-yard seasons for him in the Mike Shanahan running game. Just as offenses work better with Steve Young and John Elway at QB, running games do better with a competent OL. And that leads me to... The OL: And this OL is not competent and don't blame the injuries. The OL has stunk here for about 5-7 years and it now has a bunch of young guys playing there who aren't very good instead of a bunch of old guys who aren't very good. WRs: When was the last time the Skins had a WR that made other defensive coordinators think about building their game plan to contain him? Gary Clark? Charlie Taylor? Bobby Mitchell? But let one of these current guys go and make two tough catches in a single game and the fans are ready to nominate him for the Pro Bowl. Expectations are waaay out of line. Yesterday the Redskins wet the bed. The best thing to say about that game was that it was not one of the nationally televised games so it was not seen in sixty or seventy NFL markets. The team performed badly on the field; the game plan was certainly not effective - - that could be due to bad play on the field or bad game planning. The team has lost 3 in a row and has been less than exciting in any of those 3 games. If this team does not come out with plenty of emotion to start this week's game, then I will hang a lot of responsibility on the coaches for not finding the right buttons to push. Even playing with emotion, this team can lose next weekend; but there MUST be some fire and brimstone on the field for the first couple of series next week. THERE MUST BE!!!
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#170 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#171 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,143
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#172 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#173 | |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#174 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#175 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,471
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Smackdown - unrealistic expectations and the lockout.
I think as fans we all probably wanted to believe that this team would take a big step forward this year. Maybe not big enough to get in the playoffs, surely not big enough to do anything if we made it; but at least a big enough step to look competitive and feel good about what we could accomplish in 2012 after acquiring a few more pieces. Then came the 3-1 start, and again as fans, naturally a lot of people started "drinking the koolaid" and having visions of taking the division and having a big playoff run...I think I even saw the word Superbowl and Redskins in the same sentence a few times about three weeks ago. ![]() The big issue to me, is I don't think there is any question that the lockout hurt this team in a bad way. If you look around the league, the teams that are doing well are the teams that did well last year or were starting to put it together towards the end. They had less to work on - more cohesion...Most of the teams that had major personnel moves, scheme changes, and new pieces to plug in are the ones that are struggling. There are a few exceptions, but overall it is what it is. This team needed a full offseason to put it all together and since they didn't get it, they were forced to make the best decisions they could with the players they had, and hope the guys learn on the fly and stay healthy while doing it. Well, good fortune and health lasted about four weeks and that was it. Now you see this team decimated with injuries and the rest of the division getting healthy. This will be a long season if you are expecting to see this team win a lot of games. However, if you are satisfied with seeing progress despite the youth, inexperience and devestating injuries I think you can still look forward to that... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#176 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,143
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
You know what I saw on TV?? Harbaugh went back and looked at every single play that Smith has had over the years and BUILT the offense around his sucessful plays ONLY! He didn't install any of his negative plays. That's coaching! That's being prepared. I don't think SF is going to win a SB with Alex Smith but they've obviously coached him up. Not seeing any of that going on around here.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#177 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
That said, credit Harbaugh for above all else not asking Smith to do too much
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#178 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,143
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#179 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#180 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,221
|
Re: Smoot lays the smack down (Skins/Bills) - mattyk edition
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|