Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Brunell Starting

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-13-2005, 03:42 PM   #136
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
Rat, that's out of line. we're talking about football.
Your opinion doesn't matter to me.

I've said far worse to people on here and had worse said to me. She at least could have answered with a funny reply or a PM to say "I'm offended". If Lady T is going to go public and play the injured party I'll keep right on her.

It's a Sports Forum, not a Church picnic.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 09-13-2005, 03:46 PM   #137
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: Brunell Starting

you're right, it's a sports forum. witches aren't a topic. save that for the uh, church forum
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:49 PM   #138
paulskinsfan
Registered User
 
paulskinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West VA
Posts: 726
Re: Brunell Starting

So is the Aministrator gonna step in here, or do only the peons have to abide by the rules?
paulskinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:49 PM   #139
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: Brunell Starting

Damn you, I'd started a pyre and everything.......


Ok, I've calmed down, honestly. I'm just used to more 'heated' banter with less personal injury.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:50 PM   #140
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
i'll put an entire regular season ahead of a several preseason games any day. as Skins fans we should know how meaningless they are, Brunell never even played with starters for heaven's sake. those are very limited circumstances, and just aren't a measure of the regular season. period.

if Brunell wasn't healthy last season than i question why he kept playing. Ramsey went in, and started winning games in the same offense. if Brunell is healthier and plays better next week, it won't prove to me that Ramsey couldn't have done the same thing becuase i think the OFFENSE is better. we did *not* get a fair chance to see Ramsey behind it. call me crazy for not believing a 35 yr old QB will get much better than the year before. even if he does, he's not the future, so why bank the franchise on him? he's great as a backup, but 3 drives WASN'T ENOUGH
As SUNRA said somewhere else (can't remember where) if Ramsey with all our new weapons at his disposal (Portis, Moss, Patten, Cooley) could not master the offense this summer when it was at its most basic then how can we entrust him with this offense when it's the regular season and we add features to the offense. And the defenses become less vanilla as well.

I've been on the Brunell Bandwagon since last season. Not because I thought he should be the starter but because I thought he still could bring something to the table, and he could be called upon when needed. Especially if Ramsey couldn't show he could be our starter yet. I still don't feel that Ramsey has shown that.

In retrospect, I think that a.) Gibbs should have probably never declared Ramsey the starter going into training camp, and b.) Brunell should have probably started a game in the preseason with the first team offense
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:56 PM   #141
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hog1
Amen! For those of you that remember Mark Rypien. He was Superbowl MVP in 1992. In that season, he basically rose out of obscurity to fame. I truly never saw ANYBODY throw a better long ball. He literally bombed their opponents all year. True, they had a tested group of recievers. Not necessarily more talented, but tested. The following year he fell back in to obscurity, and later was waived. Gibbs realized he could not get a Joe Montana, so he was smart enough to back door the problem. He (and Bugel) created an incredible O-line that allowed 9 sacks (I think) all year. Any "decent" non-superstar QB should thrive in that environment. Rypien was incredible that year, and went back to suck head the next. The only difference was the protection. I think that is Coach's plan! No Joe's available.......................Brunell is at the back door (I Hope)
brunell releases fast and checks down too quickly, he's been more of the prototype QB (when in his prime) of those guys that operate fine without a good line...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:57 PM   #142
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by TAFKAS
As SUNRA said somewhere else (can't remember where) if Ramsey with all our new weapons at his disposal (Portis, Moss, Patten, Cooley) could not master the offense this summer when it was at its most basic then how can we entrust him with this offense when it's the regular season and we add features to the offense. And the defenses become less vanilla as well.

I've been on the Brunell Bandwagon since last season. Not because I thought he should be the starter but because I thought he still could bring something to the table, and he could be called upon when needed. Especially if Ramsey couldn't show he could be our starter yet. I still don't feel that Ramsey has shown that.

In retrospect, I think that a.) Gibbs should have probably never declared Ramsey the starter going into training camp, and b.) Brunell should have probably started a game in the preseason with the first team offense
thats more like it. well how often was Portis or Cooley even in the preseason line up? the one game Cooley was in there, i remember a certain Ramsey/Cooley TD..either way, its stands that preseason is no substitute for regular season, as Skins fans, we should know that better than anybody. and 3 possessions was not enough to dismiss all of Ramsey's post-Brunell success last season. This is obviously another faith/gut call from Gibbs, but so was getting Brunell to begin with.

it took Vermeil a while to get his instincts back after his comeback, and even if Brunell magically got younger instead of older, what happens next year? start over yet again? it's hard to see the progress. must be even harder for the team itself.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 03:58 PM   #143
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat
Possibly because you are not privvy to the information and knowledge that Coach Gibbs and staff have.

Exactly! From what I have heard the fly on the wall is saying Brunell secretly pulled Gibbs aside and told him Ramsey stinks and to play him.

Brunell is a jedi you know.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:03 PM   #144
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by offiss
Exactly! From what I have heard the fly on the wall is saying Brunell secretly pulled Gibbs aside and told him Ramsey stinks and to play him.

Brunell is a jedi you know.
So you're saying you speak 'Fly'?

Of all the weeks we don't need a QB controversy or division within the ranks of blindly obedient fans this was the one.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:09 PM   #145
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Brunell Starting

For all of us Ramsey bandwagon guys out here, our reality was shattered yesterday when Brunell was named the starter and we need to all come to the same conclusion... Brunell will Captain the ship, until the young Lieutenant Jason Campbell is ready to play. Gibbs said it yesterday when he stated that he was looking for a QB to emerge or take over the team or be a leader or whatever. I hate the decision as much as the next Ramsey fan, but honestly, I think Brunell may give the Skins the best chance to win next Monday night. The Skins can not have 3 or 4 turnovers and beat the Cowboys, and as many great plays as Ramsey may give us, he will undoubtabily throw a pick or fumble at some point in the game. If we play conservatively we have a better chance to win.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:10 PM   #146
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
Re: Brunell Starting

For all of us Ramsey bandwagon guys out here, our reality was shattered yesterday when Brunell was named the starter and we need to all come to the same conclusion... Brunell will Captain the ship, until the young Lieutenant Jason Campbell is ready to play. Gibbs said it yesterday when he stated that he was looking for a QB to emerge or take over the team or be a leader or whatever. I hate the decision as much as the next Ramsey fan, but honestly, I think Brunell may give the Skins the best chance to win next Monday night. The Skins can not have 3 or 4 turnovers and beat the Cowboys, and as many great plays as Ramsey may give us, he will undoubtabily throw a pick or fumble at some point in the game. If we play conservatively we have a better chance to win.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:13 PM   #147
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: Brunell Starting

Scowan, I really wanted Ramsey to succeed. I wanted him in last season and was exasperated when Coach Gibbs stuck with Brunell. I believe all of us are a little shaken by the latest turn of events but at some point you have to trust the person who makes the final decision.

I want a winning team, I'd like a star QB. I think that Campbell is the future but I don't want him thrown into the cauldron of MNF against the Cow-Whores.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:16 PM   #148
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: Brunell Starting

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
thats more like it. well how often was Portis or Cooley even in the preseason line up? the one game Cooley was in there, i remember a certain Ramsey/Cooley TD..either way, its stands that preseason is no substitute for regular season, as Skins fans, we should know that better than anybody. and 3 possessions was not enough to dismiss all of Ramsey's post-Brunell success last season. This is obviously another faith/gut call from Gibbs, but so was getting Brunell to begin with.

it took Vermeil a while to get his instincts back after his comeback, and even if Brunell magically got younger instead of older, what happens next year? start over yet again? it's hard to see the progress. must be even harder for the team itself.

As any coach will tell you, you can't simulate preseason game speed in practice, you cant simulate regular season game speed in the preseason, and you can't simulate postseason speed in the regular season.

Personally I think Gibbs is keeping his word with his QB decisions, when he convinced Brunell to come here he promised him the starters job along with a second rd pick and 42 mil, figuring he would beat out Ramsey, but that didn't happen, Ramsey has clearly outplayed Brunell when the games count.

I keep hearing the point being brought up about last year is over and Brunell has outplayed Ramsey so far this year, and in doing so deserves to start, as if last season never happend. My question to all that hold that opinion is this, what has Gibbs done to warrent the head coaching job of this team? That is if we are not going to include the past, a lowsey preseason and a 9-7 victory over a lowsey Bear team with a rookie QB in his first game.

Forget about his personel decisions which we are starting to see that Portis is anything but a Gibbs type back 50 mil., Brunell is a third string backup at best 42 mil, and we gave up next year's draft for a QB that wont be ready for 2 years, yes thats right the same amount of time it took RYPIEN to mature whom we chose in the 4th rd I do believe, Yes a rookie who doesn't have what it takes when the coach has basically admitted neither QB has done anything to take hold of the QB job, yet we see plenty of rookies who are starting and who have started over the last several years, yet our rookie who we gave up the farm to get can't sniff the field!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:17 PM   #149
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: Brunell Starting

i have one question, i'm not getting into the middle of this or anything, but here goes.

For all you Ramsey lovers out there, please answer this:

If, and if, we beat Dallas this Monday Night what will you think about the situation between Ramsey and Brunell? Will you still think Ramsey got shafted, or will you say Brunell is the better option?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2005, 04:23 PM   #150
PSUSkinsFan21
The Starter
 
PSUSkinsFan21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,340
Re: Brunell Starting

No need to rehash it all.......but I'll just go on the record saying I'm really PISSED. Joe Gibbs knows more about football than I could ever learn in 5 lifetimes, but I just don't understand this move. If our offense starts looking like last year with 2 yard dinks and dunks all over the place, it's going to be a very hard season for me to watch. This just sucks.
__________________
"Hail to the Redskins!" and "Fight on State!"
PSUSkinsFan21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.50304 seconds with 10 queries