Why is Sammy Baugh's #33 the only "Officially" retired number?

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Why is Sammy Baugh's #33 the only "Officially" retired number?

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Why is Sammy Baugh's #33 the only "Officially" retired number?

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

10-24-2012, 05:18 PM	#21
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: Why is Sammy Baugh's #33 the only "Officially" retired number? We should do what baseball does for Jackie Robinson and trot out a whole team wearing #33 for one game. I'd love it. Everyone should wear a left arm sleeve too. Imagine the confusion for the defense. "Which one is RGIII!?!?!?" I'd do it against the Giants because Coughlin would blow the biggest gasket. __________________ Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 PM.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.