Redskins-Colts, Best and Worst

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

If some guys could hold on to INTs Manning would have owned a big fat loss. Haslett didn't get owned, just stop.

Yes he did. Manning was smart enough to figure out that he relied heavily on sub packages and denied him that ability by going no huddle. Haslett was then helpless as Manning proceeded to roast us. Hell, if it weren't for SPECIAL TEAMS play (Vinateri for them and forced fumbles for US), they would have had over 30 points, maybe even 40. That is unacceptable.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis

Yes he did. Manning was smart enough to figure out that he relied heavily on sub packages and denied him that ability by going no huddle. Haslett was then helpless as Manning proceeded to roast us. Hell, if it weren't for SPECIAL TEAMS play (Vinateri for them and forced fumbles for US), they would have had over 30 points, maybe even 40. That is unacceptable.

That wasn't anything new, the Colts do that to everybody. The Skins knew it was coming and practiced doing quick subs all week.