Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Interested in TO

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Is TO Worth It for a Super Bowl-presented by dmek25
Yes-Win at all costs 23 16.08%
No-TO doesn't guarantee us anything but headaches 110 76.92%
I Don't Know-don't ask me to think in the off-season 10 6.99%
Voters: 143. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2006, 09:29 PM   #1
steveo395
The Starter
 
steveo395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper
They also were in the Superbowl and had the ball with a chance to win the game but I guess you wouldn't want the Redskins in that position...
since T.O. has been in the league, there have been 19 superbowl teams that didnt have T.O. and 1 that did(and they lost) We don't need T.O.
steveo395 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 10:43 PM   #2
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 49
Posts: 4,261
Re: Redskins Interested in TO

Quote:
Originally Posted by steveo395
since T.O. has been in the league, there have been 19 superbowl teams that didnt have T.O. and 1 that did(and they lost) We don't need T.O.
Nice argument. So what player do you think can make the Redskins a contender?
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.41040 seconds with 12 queries