|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-28-2011, 12:33 PM | #4 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: You're the GM - What do you do?
Quote:
London Fletcher showed signs of diminishing skills last year and I expect it to continue on this year. I think you overlook how important both Rogers and Buchanon are to our secondary. The majority of the negative plays go towards Hall/Barnes. There is nobody on our roster that can replace either one. Whichever center (Rabach/Barnes) plays will be absolute dogshit, even more so than last year due to either age or inexperience. On that note, the same thing applies to Phillip Daniels. I believe Anthony Bryant to not only not be adequate (2 solo tackles in 6 games all last season) but I have an inkling that he will get injured anyways being so heavy (380 lbs). I also do not believe Barrett Rudd to be an upgrade over McIntosh, especially considering he is switching systems. Atogwe is a huge upgrade, but I wouldn't expect him to be a superstar, there must be a reason he was not retained. Torain/Williams I believe will be worse than last year. Teams will not underestimate them as much and they will have more wear/tear (torain especially). Moss will not be back, and Davis is a downgrade over Cooley (who we would not get a high second for). Kelly probably won't even make the team much less start. Quinn I believe to be overrated. I think that teams will catch onto Grossman/Shannhans system this year, and we will not be able to catch teams by surprise (we started 4-3). Reminds me of what happened with Zorn when he started 6-2 with a bad team and then the next two years were junk once people saw tape. And yes I believe there to be a significant difference between 17 and a "top 15 pick". "Top 15" talent in my mind are supposed to be "can't miss talents." There are normally not actually 15 of them, its just those "top 15" talents should all be gone by 15. Its not safe at 14/15 that you will get one, so the 17 pick is not something to be overexcited about. |
|
|
|