|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
View Poll Results: Grade the Redskins 2012 Off-Season Moves | |||
A (All I hoped for and more) | 27 | 16.67% | |
B (Strong, better than expected) | 86 | 53.09% | |
C (Pretty ordinary) | 45 | 27.78% | |
F (I hate life) | 4 | 2.47% | |
Voters: 162. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-10-2012, 07:38 PM | #11 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Grade the Redskins Moves So Far
I probably would have chosen 'D' had it been an option. Forced to pick between C and F, I picked C.
I think, on the whole, the team has gotten worse between December and now relative to the rest of the league. However, there will be no games played between now and draft day which obviously became the center of the offseason when we dealt up to get RG3. And the fact that I have a stronger belief in the 2012 team than I did with the 2011 team is attributable to that selection of an elite prospect. They picked a good time to trade up, although there will never be a time in NFL history where it was smart to trade what they did to move up. The Redskins spent a lot of money on the first day of free agency that they'll almost certainly regret spending, but it could have been a lot worse, as we ended up letting San Diego, Jacksonville, and Tampa Bay bite the free agent bullets a lot harder at the receiver market. Sure, the "winners" of the free agent class are the ones who avoided receivers entirely, but the Redskins 1) clearly added a lot of depth to a position they identified as a need, and 2) managed to not piss away quite as many dollars as three other teams. If you lower the standard far enough, that counts as a success. I can't defend a lot of the teams defensive signings no matter how hard I try. Hey, here's an idea: instead of attributing the inability to lock up London Fletcher to the difficulties of the cap penalty, how about not spending millions of dollars on trash? I think the Redskins stated goal was to get better on offense in this offseason, and though the high-priced WRs and the trade up to no. 2, I think they have clearly done that. I would not be surprised if the draft leans heavily to the defensive side.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|