07-31-2012, 11:04 PM | #121 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
(Nothing against LeRib he's the kind of OL I like, I'm a draft junkie and heard about LeRib in a few articles by Gil Brandt)
Quote:
Teams draft the players they have rated higher on their boards. So according to their boards the picks they make are usually 'correct' based on their boards. But, that doesn't make the decision correct in actuality. Only time can judge whether or not a team made a correct evaluation in drafting vs passing on a player. Quote:
|
||
Advertisements |
07-31-2012, 11:04 PM | #122 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
30. I am not limiting the round of the pick and nor am I saying that we couldn't have used a tackle in the third or fourth round. There is a method to the skins FO madness and to this point they have done a decent job of turning over the team to get more productive guys.
Like I said above I would have liked to have seen a different approach in FA where there was opportunity to upgrade the position with the money that was spent on Morgan in particular. I am sure that the RT spot is something where the Skins are looking for a long term solution but during this offseason and draft they didn't find the "right" player to put their resources into.
__________________
Just win. |
07-31-2012, 11:04 PM | #123 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
When did the RT position become so important in lieu of everything else?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
07-31-2012, 11:05 PM | #124 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
|
07-31-2012, 11:09 PM | #125 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
Just win. |
|
07-31-2012, 11:10 PM | #126 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Hey at least it's something to talk about.
Better than some of the conversations that were going on prior to training camp.
__________________
Just win. |
07-31-2012, 11:12 PM | #127 | |
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,420
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Dear Baby Jesus, please turn Tom "City of" Compton into a average RT.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
07-31-2012, 11:15 PM | #128 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I'm way more upset we didn't add a legit corner over this
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
07-31-2012, 11:16 PM | #129 | ||
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
And I agree that by and large the FO is doing a good job. It bugs the heck out of me that being critical of a specific decision somehow implies disagreement with the process as a whole. Quote:
Its just that with a rookie QB, heading into a fairly important season (record-wise) it would be nice to have a more solid solution at RT. Imo murphy laws applies to football and wherever a team has a weakness or lack of depth that is gonna become the critical area/weakest link. A weak link on the OL can serious hinder an offense, especially an offense trying to bring along a rookie QB. I'm hopeful that Tyler will step up, I'm actually assuming that Tyler had to factor into the FO comfort level at the RT position. Last edited by 30gut; 07-31-2012 at 11:21 PM. |
||
07-31-2012, 11:24 PM | #130 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
And i'm a guy that likes the OL and running game by nature so this discussion is right up my alley. I was fretting about RT all offseason. I wonder how long it will take for people to get interested in talking about the Pistol formation? Good convo- I'm out |
|
07-31-2012, 11:37 PM | #131 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I say it depends. If you have two players that are one or two points apart on your board and one fits a need then generally speaking the one that fits the need is obviously the better fit.
I feel like the part where teams get in trouble comes when they reach past 5 or 10 available players for a guy that happens to fit a need.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
07-31-2012, 11:41 PM | #132 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Yep.
But hey we did get a qb!
__________________
Just win. |
07-31-2012, 11:48 PM | #133 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
I also knew we had a few holes to fill this year. #1 QB # 2-7 being CB, OL across the board, WR, and Both Safety positions. We got a few players to fill those needs. (we hope and pray!) Good talking to you 30.
__________________
Just win. |
|
08-01-2012, 12:00 AM | #134 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
If we had to go a full season with these guys I'd be pretty concerned.
|
08-01-2012, 12:15 AM | #135 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,595
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Fact of the matter is I'd rather this happen now than after week 1. At least KL is expected back for the regular season. |
|
|
|