|
07-31-2012, 02:17 PM
|
#61 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,420
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
07-31-2012, 02:20 PM
|
#62 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Bring back Rabach.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 02:35 PM
|
#63 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 02:41 PM
|
#64 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
If Goff handt gotten hurt i actually think we would have seen some of this. Right now you have Cooley, Davis, Paul. We dont really know what Paul can do blocking from the bookend position, when we need help out on the line, or when we are running jumbo/goal line packages. Zo could have played a big role in some of that stuff. Maybe part of the reason they didnt release Cooley over the weekend was that they relaized we might be asking our TE's to help out the oline early/thoughout the year a lot more than we all would like. Not tryin to rehash Cooley vs Davis blocking debate but i think the coaches view Cooley as the better blocker. Keeping RGIII upright, healthy and confident is the most important thing this year, regardless of the cap cost.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 02:49 PM
|
#65 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 02:51 PM
|
#66 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
I also thought Cooley was going to be in more of a FB/H-Back role than TE. He dropped some weight, so O-line won't work for him.
I think we're likely to see him restructure his contract to stay than being traded. Of course, there's always outright release but I'd really hate to see that. He could have a good year, his salary vs. injury history is just hurting him.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 02:59 PM
|
#67 | |
|
\m/
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:02 PM
|
#68 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:05 PM
|
#69 | |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,446
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:05 PM
|
#70 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Well, that stinks. Loved the idea of having Williams and Brown as "bookends" on our OL. Like Samuels and Jansen. |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:09 PM
|
#71 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Bringing Rabach back would be worse than bringing Stephon Heyer back to fill our vacancy at RT. Casey hasn't played since we cut him. He failed a physical with the Ravens last season. He was good, but all good things... edit: And I think Monty outplayed Rabach as a sub, against who the Titans? |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:16 PM
|
#72 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
Hoping to hear something soon
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:19 PM
|
#73 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,059
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Quote:
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
|
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:51 PM
|
#74 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Will be interesting to see what they can do now to bring in a player. I bet Bruce Allen and the rest of the FO would have liked to use whatever money they can recoup from JB's contract in FA this year.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 03:56 PM
|
#75 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,035
|
Re: We've got big trouble on the OL.
Bruce and Mike have been trying to find o-linemen, we need to see what our draft picks can do, including the still developing rookies from last year. I am not hitting the panic button or indicting the Shannahans for this situation. They took a calculated gamble on Brown and Kory is still recovering. Beck's tenure as starting QB scewed the o-lines sack numbers. They were not as bad as the sack total suggests.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
