05-19-2012, 05:39 PM | #76 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Quote:
But if indeed he has lost 15 pounds of fat...well one would infer that he sure as hell neglected cardio training in the past AND didn't keep his calorie consumption in control.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
Advertisements |
05-19-2012, 06:18 PM | #77 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Quote:
Now compare this to some of the best 'in shape' QB's. McNabb's problems have almost always come from his lack of fundamentals not his weight. And this goes for other QB's as well. For example all the bicep curls in the world aren't going to stop Rex Grossman from fumbling once every 18 snaps. QB is virtually the only position in team sports where you're better off sitting in a dark room in front of a TV or projector then you are spending time in the weight room.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG Last edited by Dirtbag59; 05-19-2012 at 06:37 PM. |
|
05-19-2012, 06:56 PM | #78 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Quote:
Being in muscular shape might not be as important, but if you're huffing and puffing and wheezing because you neglected cardio training...well, chances are that you will not be performing well. And I would disagree Ben is such a slob. He couldn't play his sandlot football without being able to run well enough to make his escapes.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
05-19-2012, 06:58 PM | #79 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
the fat makes them harder to bring down in the pocket, don't really see any other benefits
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-19-2012, 07:16 PM | #80 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Quote:
As for Ben, no doubt he can run and escape. However in this day and age of Jersey Shore people have made the mistake of confusing athletic prowess with weather or not someone has a six pack. I think that was more of the point I was trying to make.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
05-19-2012, 07:20 PM | #81 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Most athletes eat much more calories than the recommended daily intake for non-athletes. They simply burn up more calories due to the nature of their work. That does not mean type or quality does not matter, i.e Doritos and chips vs. freshly cooked bison meat, but the point is athletes devour more food than the average guy does.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
05-30-2012, 10:09 PM | #82 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
do we seriously have a player in the top 40?
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
05-31-2012, 03:47 PM | #83 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,059
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Im fat friendly
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
06-07-2012, 03:47 AM | #84 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
looks like we have a player in the top 30
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81 |
06-07-2012, 07:02 AM | #85 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,446
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
I'll start taking guesses. It's either Fred Davis, Brian Orakpo, Ryan Kerrigan, or D.Hall (I'm only including him here on status alone, if two FB's can make it a guy like D.Hall definitely could)
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
06-07-2012, 08:31 AM | #86 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Robert, Louisiana
Age: 56
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
Would that be a Hot Pocket?
__________________
Light travels faster than sound. That's why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. - Alan Dundes |
06-07-2012, 10:53 AM | #87 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
The only guy I can see making it is Rak.
|
06-07-2012, 10:57 AM | #88 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
|
06-07-2012, 11:05 AM | #89 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
|
06-07-2012, 11:10 AM | #90 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Warrenton, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 1,515
|
Re: nfl top 100 2012
that's interesting considering you normally want to handicap a player's results by the one outside of the bell curve. atleast that's my inherent internal function. it's a different paradigm to look at best individual performances at the micro scale. i like it.
|
|
|