11-02-2011, 12:50 PM | #16 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
I wonder what our situation would be right now had we gone with Bruce Allen's preferred choice and taken Eric Berry instead of Trent Williams
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Advertisements |
11-02-2011, 01:14 PM | #17 | |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
As Matty said, however, the blame for our D isn't LL's issues - it's the lack of one really good cover guy.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
11-02-2011, 01:21 PM | #18 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
LaRon is a LB who's fast, just like Polamalu. He's good and worth investing in.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
11-02-2011, 01:23 PM | #19 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
there goes the neighborhood
|
11-02-2011, 01:34 PM | #20 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
11-02-2011, 01:45 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
"There goes the neighborhood". Funny.
You must like Laron's big muscles. Or is it the way he flies thru the air with a swing and a miss? But big muscles are impressive to some. Reed can tackle better than Laron. Laron should be more solid. He has the tools. But he hasn't proved it. He sure talks a good game after the other team gets a first down and we are behind big time and he happens to be in on the tackle. There is a reason Reed is on the team playing. He has heart and doesn't talk stupid chit at the wrong time. See link below for Laron's solid play. Washington Redskins' LaRon Landry Needs to Learn How to Tackle | Bleacher Report Last edited by Sonny9TD; 11-02-2011 at 01:59 PM. |
11-02-2011, 01:48 PM | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
Last edited by Sonny9TD; 11-02-2011 at 02:01 PM. |
|
11-02-2011, 01:48 PM | #23 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
11-02-2011, 02:01 PM | #24 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
I'm not just complaining about LL per se as much as I am questioning his overall value & impact. If all we do is say, this guy (e.g. Landry) is better than that guy (e.g. Barnes), there's not much interesting to debate. I'm posing the question as to whether LL is affecting the unit's chemistry. I don't know, but take a look at our results since his return. |
|
11-02-2011, 02:01 PM | #25 | ||
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
Quote:
I should have clarified that I was speaking of the passing D - but, yes, as to that, I think that having one true cover corner would radically improve the rest of our pass defense. Right now, in our pass D, we can't take any one receiver - whether it be a WR, RB or TE - out of the game by assigning a single person to cover them. This isn't applicable to just the league's top receivers, I would suggest it is applicable to every team's top receiver. In light of that, Landry, whose coverage is based on athleticism and closing speed as opposed to anticipation and ball awareness, is forced into playing away from his strengths.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
||
11-02-2011, 02:02 PM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Quote:
|
|
11-02-2011, 02:04 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
I should have clarified that I was speaking of the passing D - but, yes, as to that, I think that having one true cover corner would radically improve the rest of our pass defense. Right now, in our pass D, we can't take any one receiver - whether it be a WR, RB or TE - out of the game by assigning a single person to cover them. This isn't applicable to just the league's top receivers, I would suggest it is applicable to every team's top receiver. In light of that, Landry, whose coverage is based on athleticism and closing speed as opposed to anticipation and ball awareness, is forced into playing away from his strengths.[/QUOTE]
You make some good points there. |
11-02-2011, 02:09 PM | #28 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
|
11-02-2011, 02:10 PM | #29 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
Holy Crap! You're serious. I thought you were joking with the Reed Doughty sh**. LOLOLOL
Reed Doughty is a great guy and certainly gives it his all. I love the guy. Unfortunately, his "all" is about 75% of LL's "Just barely trying". RD is simply LL with out LL's speed. RD has zero ball skills, his anticipation is about the same as LL and he simply doesn't have the speed to make up ground like LL does. He may have better technique at times but, if you are suggesting that RD should start ahead of LL - well, that's just crazy talk. LL has his faults, but LL and his warts are better than RD at the top of his game. RD, great guy that he is, is a back up on this or any other team.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
11-02-2011, 02:12 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 399
|
Re: Laron Landry = Lavar?
|
|
|