Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


2011 Playoff Projections

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-04-2011, 12:16 AM   #46
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 37
Posts: 36,114
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Wow Tripp you've lost me
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 08-04-2011, 12:18 AM   #47
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Wow Tripp you've lost me
Sorry. I'll keep it to single paragraph posts next time. For you.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:19 AM   #48
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
God the Raiders are just totally loaded at the wide receiver position. I'm almost certain they're going to find a way to make the playoffs. There's just no spot for them in my projections: the Chargers win the West, the Ravens and the Steelers play fictitiously easy schedules this year (as do the far less talented Browns), and the system really likes the Texans defense (seriously). So that's six playoff teams right there. I just think the Raiders are loaded.
Do you and jsarno run Vegas like Clooney and Pitt?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:24 AM   #49
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Do you and jsarno run Vegas like Clooney and Pitt?
Nah thats me and Quake or Quake and me or wait Quake and I.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:24 AM   #50
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Do you and jsarno run Vegas like Clooney and Pitt?
Ha. Not exactly, but we run Oakland like Pitt and Jonah Hill.

I still think the Texans are going to screw it up in the end. Sixteen games is a long time for Gary Kubiak and Wade Phillips to not make a franchise killing decision. They just look really good on paper in September, better than they ever have before, perhaps.

But the Jets look weaker than I've seen them in awhile, and that opens up a pretty big spot in the AFC for a surprise team to grab. Weakest AFC schedules: Steelers, Ravens, Raiders, Chargers, Browns.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:25 AM   #51
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I'll try to put it another way. I like Ford, Murphy, Schilens, DHB, Moore a lot more than I like Roddy White, Julio Jones, Harry Douglas, Eric Weems. I don't think it's even close.
Soooo, if you're not being totally sarcastic, I guess this makes it okay that they let Zach Miller get away?

I think Roddy White/Julio Jones will be a formidable 1-2 for several years.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:26 AM   #52
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,165
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
Nah thats me and Quake or Quake and me or wait Quake and I.
Bag of Quake, Quaker-Bag, Dirt-Quake, Dirt cheap, Quaker Instant Oatmeal. Yeah I'm done.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:29 AM   #53
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Soooo, if you're not being totally sarcastic, I guess this makes it okay that they let Zach Miller get away?

I think Roddy White/Julio Jones will be a formidable 1-2 for several years.
Well, they're not exactly loaded at tight end. Losing Miller is a big one. For Campbell in particular.

It's just not going to be difficult at all for them to get open receivers running downfield. Only ? will be the protection.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 12:30 AM   #54
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689 View Post
Bag of Quake, Quaker-Bag, Dirt-Quake, Dirt cheap, Quaker Instant Oatmeal. Yeah I'm done.
See we would be coming up with plans to run Vegas but we spend to much time on crap like this.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 01:15 AM   #55
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

I'm glad I'm not the only one who recognizes Oakland potential ability to be at least a sleeper. Their offense certain has weapons. At least one firmly established, and a bunch of guys with potential.

Jacoby Ford is not "just a special teamer". Unlike someone like Brandon Banks, catching difficult balls, tapping the toes before going out of bounds, and adjusting while the ball is in flight is not foreign to him. His game against the Chiefs alone is a excellent showcase of his skills at WR. And his ability to "steal interceptions" also came in handy against the Dolphins.

Those who have the Chargers pegged as a "locked" as a division winner are bound to have another wake-up call. Despite having plenty of sacks as a team, they only had ONE 10+ sack player.
Not to mention Norval is always giving some "chokeritis" to that team.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 01:20 AM   #56
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirClintonPortis View Post
I'm glad I'm not the only one who recognizes Oakland potential ability to be at least a sleeper. Their offense certain has weapons. At least one firmly established, and a bunch of guys with potential.
Oh theres plenty of sleepers. However much less in the AFC where the top 6 have been established for the last few years. However you look at Tenneessee who maybe gets the old Matt Hasselbeck, or maybe Houston gets their defense on track and makes a run at the South. Kansas City is coming off a playoff year. Jacksonville is always tough and scrappy. However that top 6 in the AFC doesn't seem likely to budge without a major injury or two.

NFC theres much more wiggle room at the bottom. Skins aside I could easily see New York, Dallas, Tampa, Seattle, and Chicago all making the playoffs among the teams I didn't list. However I like the Lions to get all their crap together.

One things for sure though, there will be surprises. I just hope that Beck and the Skins in general are one of them.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 01:34 AM   #57
SirClintonPortis
Pro Bowl
 
SirClintonPortis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirtbag59 View Post
Oh theres plenty of sleepers. However much less in the AFC where the top 6 have been established for the last few years. However you look at Tenneessee who maybe gets the old Matt Hasselbeck, or maybe Houston gets their defense on track and makes a run at the South. Kansas City is coming off a playoff year. Jacksonville is always tough and scrappy. However that top 6 in the AFC doesn't seem likely to budge without a major injury or two.

NFC theres much more wiggle room at the bottom. Skins aside I could easily see New York, Dallas, Tampa, Seattle, and Chicago all making the playoffs among the teams I didn't list. However I like the Lions to get all their crap together.

One things for sure though, there will be surprises. I just hope that Beck and the Skins in general are one of them.
You're assuming "Oakland for the wildcard". The thing is, the AFC West is wide open between the Chargers, Chiefs, and Raiders, and there is nothing I see that automatically stops the Raiders from winning it. The Raiders outright crushed their in-division opponents last season, but didn't manage well outside of their division. The Chargers usually have been flaky, starting off poorly and then getting hot late. That the Chiefs and Raiders sucked then helped the Chargers, but now, they don't have such soft competition anymore.

While they have lost Nnamdi, their offense is young and bound to improve this season. DMac is easily recognizeable as a monster, but I say their O is criminally underrated. Marcel Reece is NOT just a blocking FB, he can catch since he's a converted WR and his abilities were employed by Hue Jackson in a couple games last season.

Al Davis has brought in a bunch of Olinemen through the draft a FA. Unless they all are duds, their O-line is going to improve some.

I've already gone over Ford. Louis Murphy is pretty consistent.

As for the D, I will point out that a stud MLB can make up for some deficiencies, and Rolondo McClain is certainly on his merry.

And the Raiders special teams. I'd say that they'll be damn good. Rock knows how to manage return coverage and Jacoby Ford is a deadly returner. Even with Ford's injury, that team has so many athletes that getting field position shouldn't be too difficult.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness".

Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten.

The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan.
SirClintonPortis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 02:13 AM   #58
NC_Skins
Gamebreaker
 
NC_Skins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,402
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
God the Raiders are just totally loaded at the wide receiver position. I'm almost certain they're going to find a way to make the playoffs.
The problem is, they have a QB who is a check-down king so good WRs isn't going to change his game or deep ball accuracy (or lack thereof). Also, the Raiders are notorious for finding ways of not making the playoffs which will par for the course with their new coach
NC_Skins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 02:15 AM   #59
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
The problem is, they have a QB who is a check-down king so good WRs isn't going to change his game or deep ball accuracy (or lack thereof). Also, the Raiders are notorious for finding ways of not making the playoffs which will par for the course with their new coach
One of the guys that I'm very curious to see numbers in the new rating system. Still, has to be a Bia to put all that together. For the standard QB rating you just have to enter 5 numbers. These guys at ESPN are going to, if they're lucky, enter in 20 or 30 different numbers for one rating.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2011, 02:18 AM   #60
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: 2011 Playoff Projections

Quote:
Originally Posted by NC_Skins View Post
The problem is, they have a QB who is a check-down king so good WRs isn't going to change his game or deep ball accuracy (or lack thereof). Also, the Raiders are notorious for finding ways of not making the playoffs which will par for the course with their new coach
People have been predicting this for years, but the next time it comes true will be the first.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.36047 seconds with 12 queries