01-03-2011, 04:16 PM | #16 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
I really like Steve Breaston, and he seems like the type of guy that would do really well under Shanhan. I think he has zero ego. Also everyone keeps saying they think VJ stays with SD..... any real reason behind this? I mean dont both sides feel kind of burned by the whole thing and might not be in tune with each other when it comes contract time? I was all about NOT getting him when a trade was involved by as a FA im all for it |
|
Advertisements |
01-03-2011, 05:01 PM | #17 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,545
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
|
|
01-03-2011, 05:29 PM | #18 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
I don't know how to feel about this. The receiver position rarely wins championships so numbers wise I'd say that having three guys over 800 yards is actually pretty damn good. Combine that with the 300 yard performance of Fred Davis (which is much more then what I thought he would get after the first quarter of the year) along with the anticipated development of Terrance Austin and I'd say we're actually in pretty good shape.
I mean this isn't the first time Shanahan has brought in guys, practically off the street to catch passes (read: late round picks and UDFA's). Heck if anything the pattern is starting to mirror his ability to find running backs. The positions we need to focus on drafting are at Quarterback, offensive line, and defense. Receiver and running back are two units that given the Shanahan's history we can afford to be patient on.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
01-03-2011, 06:06 PM | #19 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
01-03-2011, 06:26 PM | #20 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
I've seen a couple mock drafts that show us taking a reciever at #1.
It wouldnt surprise me.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
01-03-2011, 06:31 PM | #21 | |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
The only type of guy I'm really interested in adding is a big body that can lineup wide, like VJax, otherwise I'll stick with the current group of guys.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
01-03-2011, 06:43 PM | #22 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
01-03-2011, 08:02 PM | #23 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
I think the VJ thing comes down to 1) they'll prob end up offering him what he wants 2) he's got one of the best QBs in the league and that QB wants him back 3) awesome area for a young athlete
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
01-03-2011, 08:14 PM | #24 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
kid's NEVER fumbled in college but on some plays he could protect the ball better, switch hands, etc.. guess he's pretty strong and that Murray kid at QB, efficient, quick, he could end up being something pretty special too
__________________
http://www.twitter.com/RedskinsRT |
|
01-03-2011, 08:18 PM | #25 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
01-03-2011, 08:23 PM | #26 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
The team just needs to a better job scouting for late round gems and UDRFAs. I'm optimistic that'll happen with Shanahan in the mix.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
01-04-2011, 01:03 AM | #27 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 3,813
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
They did a pretty good job of finding our 3rd down back in keiland williams and our first explosive return guy in years in Brandon banks. That's more than the last couple regimes had to show from UDFAs from a single draft class.
__________________
"Ahhh, so you're stupid in 3 languages?" |
01-04-2011, 01:10 AM | #28 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Martinsburg, WV
Posts: 3,881
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Yeah, I think WR is actually the one postition were we can let stay as is in the offseason.. Maybe add somebody like Breaston, but that's about it. Just gotta re-sign Moss.
We really need help on the Oline, Dline, and Linbacker positions if you ask me. Anything else would be 2nd. |
01-04-2011, 10:53 PM | #29 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Santana Moss had a lot of catches this year but his big gains were limited. The reason is that he was the only receiver that the Skins had who could reliably run the immediate short routes, catch the ball and then have the potential to do somethingwith it after the catch. However, that is not Moss's game.
If the Skins have S. Moss doing the same thing next year with similar production from everyone else on the roster, count on another year of no playoffs and a sub-.500 record. Having said that, re-signing Santana Moss is imperative for a reason that has ZERO to do with stats. Santana Moss is one of the VERY few WRs in the NFL who is simultaneously: 1. CompetentThe Skins need to keep him here for the next couple of years to be the mentor/role model for whomever they bring in to be the WRs of the future for this team. Santana Moss has to show them what it means to be an NFL player. Think back to Crash Davis and Nuke LaLoosh in Bull Durham...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
01-05-2011, 12:18 AM | #30 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Our Current status at the WR position
Quote:
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|