03-17-2010, 01:59 PM | #106 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
The thing is, Matt Leinart fell quite a bit, and according to Bill Polian, there are little to no surprises in the first round of the NFL draft, only to "analysts" and "fans" who know a lot less.
|
Advertisements |
03-17-2010, 02:02 PM | #107 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
It's hard to question a man like Polian but at the same time even our mighty Vinnie mentioned things much later that corroborated with our draft choices and the success/failures of players.
|
03-17-2010, 02:03 PM | #108 | |
Fire Bruce NOW
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
How long has it been since we had an elite QB? How long has it been since we're down 3 late in a game but we can think, "It's ok, we have ______ at QB," the way that Colts and Chargers can? I have no problem with drafting Okung since the line needs help. But I also have no problem with drafting a QB at #4.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
03-17-2010, 02:03 PM | #109 |
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Does this spell the end of colt?
__________________
That got ugly fast |
03-17-2010, 02:05 PM | #110 |
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 46
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
I cannot wait for a month from now when the draft is over and the focus sifts from "who we should take" to "Why we will be a contender". And I would love for once for the kool aid drinkers to be right.
I hate the effin offseason. |
03-17-2010, 02:07 PM | #111 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
That's in hindsight, though. What Bill Polian was saying is that going into the draft, it's obvious what general order the players are going to go in the first round. So if Matt Leinart suddenly turns out great in hindsight, that's awesome, but there's a valid reason he went #10 instead of in the Top 5, and it would not have made much sense for the Jets to "reach" for Leinart unless they knew something the other teams didn't, which is rarely the case.
|
03-17-2010, 02:08 PM | #112 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
He only fell to 6th overall, certainly nothing like Aaron Rodgers the year before. And Bill Pollian? The guy who blamed the Super Bowl loss on the O-Line despite averaging over 5 yards per rush and allowing no sacks? Screw that guy, he's a good talent evaluator but from now on I'll take things he says with a grain of salt.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
03-17-2010, 02:09 PM | #113 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
|
|
03-17-2010, 02:11 PM | #114 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
I have yet to hear that Kyle is infatuated with Colt and throwing all his chips into the pot in regards to Colt. |
|
03-17-2010, 02:12 PM | #115 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
Also, Bill Polian will most likely be vindicated. What he says might go against popular belief, but popular belief isn't always right. For example, the reason the "offensive line" was averaging over 5 yards per rush and allowing no sacks probably has more to do with Peyton Manning than the line itself. |
|
03-17-2010, 02:13 PM | #116 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
|
03-17-2010, 02:14 PM | #117 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
I think if both Shanahan's want Bradford bad enough then there will or is a trade scenario already planned. The only sure spot in the draft to get the player you want is at #1. |
|
03-17-2010, 02:15 PM | #118 |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Okay that's fine, but you can't compare it to Leinart then. Leinart was drafted in 2006, not 2009.
|
03-17-2010, 02:17 PM | #119 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 104
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
Bill Polian said in 2009 that there are rarely any surprises in the first round of the NFL draft to those in the actual drafting process. You're saying in any draft before 2009, specifically three years prior, there were plenty of surprises? |
|
03-17-2010, 02:19 PM | #120 | |
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins Sign Grossman
Quote:
Are there surprises? Sure.. some 1st round players turn out to be huge busts hell anyone can say are you surprised a number 4 ended up being a great player? why would you argue that? he was picked top 5 there are plenty of surprises in the 1st and plenty of teams that would've jumped on the bust had the original team not |
|
|
|