ESPN: Clayton Expects Skins to Tender Campbell for a 1st and 3rd

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

I agree, If someone offered a 2nd or 3rd, I could see us trading him away. Honestly I think he deserves a shot at another team, i've heard around here that STL is interested in Campbell, also Buffalo is as well. I would deal him if we are going to draft Bradford. He could come in as a rookie and do a decent job (Sanchez, Flacco, Ryan) . Clausen? I dont know for sure..

Big if Okie if he could(Bradford doing a good job as a rook). Ryan's and Flacco's sophmore seasons weren't so hot as their debut seasons. Ryan is a true QB. Flacco is just a game manager with a great supporting cast. Sanchez to me is somewhere in the middle, but closer to Flacco as being a game manager. I don't think Bradford will have the wideouts that Ryan has to do a lot of damage if he starts next season, that is if we draft him.

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

who's going to pay a 1st and 3rd for campbell he wasn't even worht the 1st yo uused nthe first place... he's an ok QB could be good i na few years maybe i nthe right system but no way worth a 1st and 3rd right now.... maybe a 3rd only.

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

[MTK]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

I'm actually amazed that so many don't seem to understand about the way the tenders work. This isn't anything new.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

I'm actually amazed that so many don't seem to understand about the way the tenders work. This isn't anything new.

I'm amazed that some people don't understand the concept of a restricted free agent, and that getting an RFA would typically consist of giving up a draft pick(s) in order to get them.

[MTK]

We could use a free agency FAQ, I'm too lazy to put it together though. And it's really just a Google away anyway so I don't feel bad for slapping someone down who doesn't do a basic search before chiming in with their "knowledge".

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

We could use a free agency FAQ, I'm too lazy to put it together though. And it's really just a Google away anyway so I don't feel bad for slapping someone down who doesn't do a basic search before chiming in with their "knowledge".

Is there a program you can apply where if someone repeatedly makes propositions that have been thoroughly explained over and over why they won't work, and they completely ignore them and keep posting the same ridiculous propositions, that their keyboards can be set to shock them back to reality upon contact?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Is there a program you can apply where if someone repeatedly makes propositions that have been thoroughly explained over and over why they won't work, and they completely ignore them and keep posting the same ridiculous propositions, that their keyboards can be set to shock them back to reality upon contact?

That would be a nice gimmick. I'd like for every person who proposes for our team to go after a RFA to get shocked.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by 53Fan

Is there a program you can apply where if someone repeatedly makes propositions that have been thoroughly explained over and over why they won't work, and they completely ignore them and keep posting the same ridiculous propositions, that their keyboards can be set to shock them back to reality upon contact?

At the least I wish people would read a bit more before posting. So often the answers are right there. Makes you feel like you're talking to yourself sometimes with the way people post the same stuff over and over that's already been addressed, often just a few posts earlier.

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

At the least I wish people would read a bit more before posting. So often the answers are right there. Makes you feel like you're talking to yourself sometimes with the way people post the same stuff over and over that's already been addressed, often just a few posts earlier.

I think that's what gets me the most. Reading can be educational fella's.

[CRedskinsRule]

I was just thinking, what about a program that sends a shock feedback to people repeating the same proposition over and over, and not taking time to read the discussions even one or two p [aarrgh] why did my computer shock me, anyway, like i was saying- one or two posts bef[AAARRRRGGHH], my computer must be f'ed up..

SO if Matty could find a program that would shoc [AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGHHHHHHH]
D*** COMPUTER!!

[53Fan]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

I was just thinking, what about a program that sends a shock feedback to people repeating the same proposition over and over, and not taking time to read the discussions even one or two p [aarrgh] why did my computer shock me, anyway, like i was saying- one or two posts bef[AAARRRRGGHH], my computer must be f'ed up..

SO if Matty could find a program that would shoc [AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGHHHHHHH]
D*** COMPUTER!!

YEAH! Got one!!!

[tryfuhl]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

We could use a free agency FAQ, I'm too lazy to put it together though. And it's really just a Google away anyway so I don't feel bad for slapping someone down who doesn't do a basic search before chiming in with their "knowledge".

Exactly

"well I didn't know so..."

what other presentations do you do without actually looking into something? is that how proposals go in the rest of the world?

I realize that this is more of a casual site based on more of a hobby or interest but dang

[D'BOYZ]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

jesus christ my screen is half red from the underlines of your shitty spelling

I'm more offended that you have no clue how the tender system works though

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS.... first he hasn't been placed a 1st & 3rd round tender so saying that there's no need for dan Snyder to give him that tender it's not out of the question.

First you have to decide 1 thing do you want him back or prefer to get something out of him, If you want to keep him how much is he worth in the aspect of what teams would be willing to give for him.

Putting a same pick tender which is the normal tender would give you guys a 1st round pick if a team would offer a contract you wouldn't want to match but in case nobody would want to sign him it would cost less to keep him than a 1st and 3rd round tender which is the highest.

I don't see a team paying a 1st round pick for campbell less a 1st and 3rd and if Dan wants to trade him it gives him less leverage if he puts a the highest tender because less people would knock on his door because of what he would like to trade for ( at least a 1st round in this case)..... putting a same pick tender which is the less value type of tender gives him two options keep him cheap or get value for him a 2nd or 3rd round pick in a trade.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS.... first he hasn't been placed a 1st & 3rd round tender so saying that there's no need for dan Snyder to give him that tender it's not out of the question.

First you have to decide 1 thing do you want him back or prefer to get something out of him, If you want to keep him how much is he worth in the aspect of what teams would be willing to give for him.

Putting a same pick tender which is the normal tender would give you guys a 1st round pick if a team would offer a contract you wouldn't want to match but in case nobody would want to sign him it would cost less to keep him than a 1st and 3rd round tender which is the highest.

I don't see a team paying a 1st round pick for campbell less a 1st and 3rd and if Dan wants to trade him it gives him less leverage if he puts a the highest tender because less people would knock on his door because of what he would like to trade for ( at least a 1st round in this case)..... putting a same pick tender which is the less value type of tender gives him two options keep him cheap or get value for him a 2nd or 3rd round pick in a trade.

No.

The tender has virtually nothing to do with trade value. The Skins can tag Campbell with a first and third tender and then trade him for a Snickers bar if they like.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by D'BOYZ

OFFCOURSE I KNOW HOW A TENDER SYSTEM WORKS....

Is that your final answer?