10-13-2009, 01:54 PM | #676 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
His play, o line changes, improved running game, Smoot and Springs playing lighs out, the emotions running through the team, Collins' knowledge of the offense, etc.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
Advertisements |
10-13-2009, 02:01 PM | #677 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 1,851
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
He just may but I doubt we would've scored 9 points against the Rams. I doubt that the games would be as close against lesser competition. Before Samuels and Thomas went down there was the exact same production from the offense that we've seen through the 2 systems that Campbell has played under since being a starter here. His stats look good by the time the game is over but there aren't many points scored. Everyone needs to come to the realization that Danny was right about him. He believed in Jason and when he lost his faith in him he lost it. I wish JC well in his future endeavors but I doubt he'll be the stud that people think Washington is keeping him from becoming.
__________________
Catch me on YouTube ! http://www.youtube.com/user/DowntimeRB?feature=mhw5 The "punishment" by the league : "It's like getting a ticket for going too fast on a road a week ago and they changed the speed limit today" |
10-13-2009, 02:09 PM | #678 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Putting Collins in completely stops the evaluation of JC and if JC isn't the guy doesn't allow us to look at Woodson.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
10-13-2009, 02:28 PM | #679 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
|
10-13-2009, 02:50 PM | #680 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
aka super smart aka fighting their guts out
The last 4 games of 2007 Springs had something like 15 tackles, 10 passes defended and 4 interceptions Smoot didn't have quite the stats but he made some huge tackles as I recall
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
10-13-2009, 02:53 PM | #681 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Chase Daniels is a FA
|
10-13-2009, 03:56 PM | #682 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Never heard of anyone named Chase Daniels.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
10-13-2009, 03:58 PM | #683 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
We no longer run that offense. His arm looked incredibly weak in the preseason too. TC could never duplicate that stretch of games again.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
10-13-2009, 04:03 PM | #684 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 20
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Jason sucks, it's been like that for past years!
|
10-19-2009, 11:20 AM | #685 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
UPDATED stats/assessment...yep, I said I'd keep doing it!
Cutler: WK 6 - 24/43 (62.8%), 300 yds, 2 TD, 2 INT, 79.6 rating, 34 rush yds TOTAL: 110/172 (64.0%), 1,201 yds, 10 TD, 7 INT, 86.9 rating, 56 rush yds Sanchez: WK 6 - 10/29 (34.5%), 119 yds, 0 TD, 5 INT, 8.3 rating, 6 rush yds TOTAL: 85/163 (52.1%), 1,035 yds, 5 TD, 10 INT, 56.7 rating, 50 rush yds Campbell: WK 6 (half) - 9/16 (56.3%), 89 yds, 0 TD, 1 INT, 46.1 rating, 6 rush yds TOTAL: 107/163 (65.6%), 1,197 yds, 6 TD, 6 INT, 84.3 rating, 95 rush yds Ranks: Comp. % = Campbell, Cutler, Sanchez Yds = Cutler (1,201) Campbell (1,197), Sanchez (1,035) TDs = Cutler (10), Campbell (6), Sanchez (5) INTs (fewest) = Campbell (6), Cutler (7), Sanchez (10) QB rating = Cutler (86.9), Campbell (84.3), Sanchez (56.7) Rush yds = Campbell (95), Cutler (56), Sanchez(50) Anyone still want Sanchez? Cutler is beginning to look slightly better than Campbell in yards and TDs, but really, statistically there is not much of a difference and Jason still leads in a few categories. Of course, Cutler has played 2 more quarters than Campbell, but the separation is not drastic in those few categories. Also, Campbell still proves to be the most efficient (completion %), least turnover-prone and still the best runner when in trouble by far.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
10-19-2009, 11:46 AM | #686 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 121
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Those of you who called for Todd Collins do you really think he played better that JC vs the chiefs?
|
10-19-2009, 11:55 AM | #687 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Cutler's numbers are so minimally-better than Campbell's that it's obvious that even if he were on the Redskins this season, he's be no better or worse than Campbell. With Vinny in charge of building our O-line and Zorn calling plays (up until now)...Campbell was our best-bet for this season.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
10-19-2009, 12:13 PM | #688 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Three Chopt Virginia
Age: 47
Posts: 2,906
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
That image of Campbell sitting on the bench doesn't lie either.
__________________
A funny thing happened on the way to the temple. The moneychangers bought the priesthood. |
10-19-2009, 12:18 PM | #689 | |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I dont think most coaches would have made that move as it is obvious JC is epically better than all other options the SKins have (TC).
__________________
Vacancy |
|
10-19-2009, 12:19 PM | #690 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
So you support Zorn's decisions? Good for you.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|