10-05-2009, 02:42 PM | #616 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
What is our record when Clinton runs for 100+ yards? Exactly!! He had 98 the last game. We have to run the ball to control time of possession and to wear out a defense. Also to set up the play action. If not we are totally one dimensional and ineffective as a whole.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
|
Advertisements |
10-05-2009, 02:53 PM | #617 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
If not, Campbell can pull a Brunell and throw to Moss to the tune of 1500 yards and sprinkle in some Cooley. Regardless, there's no excuse for being one of the 3 worst Offenses in the league. Other teams have shitty receivers and still manage to put points on the board. Our Offense is just bad across the board.
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
10-05-2009, 03:04 PM | #618 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The ATX (formerly Balmer)
Posts: 1,125
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Agreed 100%!! Which is why I'm glad there is no objective quantifiable measurement available which ranks us "one of the 3 worst Offenses in the league".
__________________
"To bring a Sherm Lewis in to a Jim Zorn and whoever his offensive coordinator is, it's like bringing in another man to help teach you how to make better love to your wife or something." -- Tre Johnson |
10-05-2009, 03:08 PM | #619 |
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 55
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Granted I am watching the broadcast at home and not at the game, so some of you actually at the game yesterday please correct me if I am wrong, but I watch JC go back to pass (again I can't see what is going on down the field on TV) and I see reasonable protection and JC holding the ball along time. To my earlier statement, is that JC's fault? or again are guys not getting open and separating themselves from the defenders?
I saw a lot of promise from Marko Mitchell in Preseason. Is that because he was going against inferior CBs or because he can separate from defenders? We know Cooley can find open space and Moss can just flat burn you, but Kelly and Thomas can not create their own separation for some reason. Am I wrong on that? Please someone respond who was at the game and could watch the secondary all day. |
10-05-2009, 03:35 PM | #620 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
You are 100% correct. There is no timing to Campbell's game. That is actually nothing new, it has been the case all year. Good NFL QBs make throws into tight windows, on rhythm, and with anticipation. Guys who are not good NFL QBs do not get a clear picture at the snap, lack good timing and anticipation, hold the ball too long, and flush themselves by being unable to pull the trigger. They can make throws to open receivers, and certainly Campbell can do that, but really do not give receivers an opportunity to make plays. You are also correct in saying that without the All-22 and access to the Redskins game plan it is difficult to properly break down the performance of an NFL quarterback. But we have a large enough sample size at this point to say that Campbell's deficiencies are not simply a product of great coverage/poor receiver play. He is a back-up NFL quarterback because he is unable to quickly identify coverages and make throws into tight windows. Guys who actually do break down coaches tape (i.e. Greg Cosell and Ron Jaworski - not to mention the Redskins own personnel department) have all seen the same thing that you and I are seeing just by watching the TV broadcast. You are not going to get great separation in the NFL from your receivers, at least not often, and what separates good quarterbacks from marginal guys is the ability to diagnosis coverages, anticipate routes, and throw into tight windows. What is so frustrating about Campbell is that he has NFL tools, particularly with his arm, but he does not do any of the other things necessary to be a good NFL quarterback. I thought he did and thought the Redskins should take the opportunity to find out if he really did this season http://www.thewarpath.net/redskins-l...tml#post557863. I think we have now seen enough, against very bad NFL defenses, to answer the question. But Ruh and DMV will just shout down rationale posts based upon actually watching the games and thinking about what determines good NFL quarterback play and just call it "hating." Far from it though. I am addressing the reality that has shown itself on the field in every game this season. It was as evident in Detroit as it was against Tampa, the difference was in the statistical outcome, but the same deficiencies were present.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
10-05-2009, 03:47 PM | #621 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
To add to you trying to call me out. I watch the games and watch them closely. When JC plays bad I say he plays bad. But I am not going to sit and hate all the time and not give him credit when he has a decent game. We are level headed and know that it is a combination of things. The o-line, the running game, lack of a second WR, play calling -- all of that. We dont claim JC is Peyton Manning or the "untouchable" Brady. What we claim is people love to hate but rarely congratulate. You are a perfect example of this. So if you think JC is the only reason we are struggling you obviously are not watching the games close enough. As far as the sentence I highlighted that may be true. But in the end we won the game despite those defficiencies -- he battled back and helped us win the game. You are not a hater because you have a opinion. You are a hater because all you do is hate!!
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
|
10-05-2009, 04:34 PM | #622 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Look, he put in a gutty performance in a tough situation. That shows great character and toughness, very admirable qualities. I do not question that. But that does not mean he does not have significant flaws as an NFL quarterback. I'm very willing to lay the blame on the Redskins for messing up his development, but where you lay the blame does not change the outcome.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
10-05-2009, 04:50 PM | #623 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Sure you dont work for Snyder? Seems like most of your posts are about merchandising..lol.. The Warpath
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
|
10-05-2009, 04:58 PM | #624 | |
The Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,373
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
But there's booze in the blender. And soon it will render. That frozen concoction that helps me hang on. |
|
10-05-2009, 05:03 PM | #625 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Sorry, I was a true fan up until we lost to the lonely 0-19 Detroit Lions, and we became the laughing stock of the NFL, Do you all watch any of the pregame shows? They all had awful things to say about us. Then we struggle to get a win against the 0-3 Bucs, and struggle to get a win against the now 0-4 Rams, lets see we got the 0-4 chiefs and 0-4 panthers? How we gonna do? Ever since we lost to the lions I said now with confidence "We are not going to make the Playoffs." Thats what I would consider a good season, is making the playoffs, and I don't see us making the playoffs. No way, If we lose to the lonely detroit lions, no way.
|
10-05-2009, 05:10 PM | #626 | ||
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Well, at least you are not this guy... Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
||
10-05-2009, 05:12 PM | #627 | |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
:cool-smil
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
|
10-05-2009, 05:13 PM | #628 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I was a true fan until we lost and the pregame shows said "why are you a fan?"...
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
10-05-2009, 05:13 PM | #629 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
10-05-2009, 05:15 PM | #630 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|