09-28-2009, 11:27 PM | #106 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
Advertisements |
09-28-2009, 11:31 PM | #107 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
09-28-2009, 11:33 PM | #108 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Posts: 336
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
I dont think its just Redskins fans, its football fans in general. The QB position is the most critical position on the field, and those that play it MUST have thick skin. First one to blame for a loss, first one to praise for a win, it just comes along with the job.
__________________
_________________________ 6 win talent + 2 win coaching = 4-12 season. |
09-28-2009, 11:35 PM | #109 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
|
|
09-28-2009, 11:36 PM | #110 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
God I miss the early Norv days. I think I am going to get a Frerotte jersey now!!!!!
|
09-28-2009, 11:37 PM | #111 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Maybe there's something intangible that Campbell is missing that contributes to the offensive disorganization. But it never looks like the game is too fast for him out there, if anything, it looks like he wants to get out there and run plays faster than Zorn can get them in. I put the disorganization on Zorn, not Campbell lacking in intangibles.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
09-28-2009, 11:40 PM | #112 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
True, but at least he had heart!!!!! And unless JC gets the TD machine going Gus will still be over JC in passing TDs as a Skin at year's end!!!!!!!!! Also, did Gus have the weapons like JC does now? |
|
09-28-2009, 11:41 PM | #113 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Gus Frerotte Rules!!!! |
|
09-28-2009, 11:44 PM | #114 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
He didn't have a Cooley comparable, but then again, Campbell's numbers are just better. So Cooley might help to explain that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
09-28-2009, 11:45 PM | #115 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
And I wouldn't brag too hard on his numbers... they were less than impressive. In fact they were pretty mediocre. Gus Frerotte NFL & AFL Football Statistics | Pro-Football-Reference.com |
|
09-28-2009, 11:46 PM | #116 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Ellard was on the downslope of his career at that point, so was Leslie Shepard. He also didn't have a Cooley to save his ass either. |
|
09-28-2009, 11:47 PM | #117 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
campbell is mark brunell jr. he is a happy looser.
__________________
not an expert, just a fan. |
09-28-2009, 11:48 PM | #118 | |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
He was still pretty damn good Henry Ellard NFL & AFL Football Statistics | Pro-Football-Reference.com As for TE Jamie Asher was a pretty reliable target |
|
09-28-2009, 11:48 PM | #119 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
As I said, I wish Campbell was a terrible QB so these morons had something to complain about.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
09-28-2009, 11:49 PM | #120 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Gus had Brian Mitchell
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|