12-02-2008, 12:42 AM | #46 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
^^^ Sorry for the freak-out. I just keep seeing that people aren't acknowledging what/who we have at the HC position.
__________________
24-34 |
Advertisements |
12-02-2008, 12:52 AM | #47 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Wasn't there a thread a couple of weeks ago about how we should hurry up and sign Jason to a big contract? Seems like fans want to either hurry up and sign him or hurry up and bench him. Instant gratification in football is a myth. It doesn't work. Danny tried that his first few years as owner. We have a first year coach and a QB playing in a new system. Let's get some linemen and keep building. The NY fans were ready to dump Eli long time ago. Not so much now.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
12-02-2008, 12:53 AM | #48 | ||
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-02-2008, 12:54 AM | #49 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
|
12-02-2008, 01:00 AM | #50 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C.
Posts: 7,570
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Thats alright Goat...you're just "playing" with heart.
__________________
Defense wins championships. Bring it! |
12-02-2008, 01:05 AM | #51 |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Fans are stupid. JC improved alot from last year, give him atleast a year with one system. Sure go get a good backup for competition next camp, but now let him do his thing.
__________________
Vacancy |
12-02-2008, 01:09 AM | #52 | |
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 37
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
__________________
Vacancy |
|
12-02-2008, 09:35 AM | #53 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,228
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Or McNabb. A bad game (or two) does not make a season or a career.
__________________
Playing a kids game for a kings ransom. |
12-02-2008, 11:07 AM | #54 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Funny last year when our no name back up entered the game we did not have a problem with our passing game and moving the ball.
|
12-02-2008, 12:06 PM | #55 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Quote:
Seriously guys, anyone who thinks we've got a QB controversy or should be starting Collins or Brennan is just completely clueless. Teams with a WINNING RECORD don't bench their 25 yr old QB (to the genius who said 'play the young guy') who hasn't turned the ball over, hasn't looked like a complete buffoon and hadn't cost the team games.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
12-02-2008, 12:08 PM | #56 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
From the JLC article:
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
12-02-2008, 12:56 PM | #57 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Most of your statements have been far off. First of all we are not out of the play-offs yet. Even if we loss against Baltimore we might not be out of the play-offs. If we win out or atleast only take 1 lose to the AFC. We still might sqeak in. I would rather win out though. So to replace the QB at this time. Would be idiotic. Why because we are still in it. if we were 5-7. Or worse it might be different. But for now. Chill out and lets see if we can adjust and if the O-line can protect JC and the WRs especially the rookies can step up and hodl on to the ball. That's our achilles heel. Hopefully we can get some wind behind us if we win against the Ravens. But saying to replace the QB right now is not a good option and I question many of your statements.
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company Last edited by dmvskinzfan08; 12-02-2008 at 01:02 PM. |
12-02-2008, 01:00 PM | #58 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 968
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Ummm...Is Al Saunders still the Offensive Coordinator..Uh no!! That's why there was no problem. he have been learning "that" offense for almost 10 years. So he knew the ins and out. So to think he can come in his first year and do better than JC is uneducated to say the least. he looked horrible in preseason. JC isn't the most mobile QB. But imagine Collins when the line breaks down as it often does..
__________________
HTTR 09 - RIP#21 HATERS << Misery Loves Company |
12-02-2008, 01:00 PM | #59 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
It would be a huge mistake to replace JC at this point in the season and I am certain that Zorn & Co. wont do it.
|
12-02-2008, 01:12 PM | #60 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
|
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy
Different offense, different circumstances, and there were other factors at play than just the QB play.
|
|
|