Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: WTF Pick of Day One
WR Devin Thomas (34) 18 12.00%
TE Fred Davis (48) 95 63.33%
WR Malcolm Kelly (51) 37 24.67%
Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2008, 09:11 PM   #601
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
So two WRs plus they signed Mathis? My guess is Mathis is gone before he even starts.

When are we getting some D-line help? Kendall Langford in the 4th round?
The pick that really has me scratching my head is Fred Davis. I'm assuming that the thinking is both that now you can run two TE sets and have two pass receiving players as well as some insurance should Cooley go down for any time. Seems like a luxury pick with both Campbell and Groves on the board at that time. I know they liked Kelly, and I did as well, but also seems like a bit of a luxury pick ... after taking Thomas.

I would have thought they might have gone Campbell at 48 then even come back with Kelly ... The only thing I can say about skipping on Campbell is that his college coach is now coaching our line so maybe he knew some things that he didn't like. They've watched the tape, I haven't, but I'm kind of scratching my head here ... no help on defense?
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-26-2008, 09:12 PM   #602
itvnetop
Playmaker
 
itvnetop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 47
Posts: 3,007
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Well, WR has been a position of concern the past few seasons. Moss and ARE are solid- but we know that Moss is injury-prone. What's the best way to help Campbell immediately in his 20th offensive system in five years? Weapons.

According to scouts, these guys are not just tall receivers. They all had first round ability. And despite being the 3rd TE taken, BFD is the best TE in the draft (my homerism aside). Workout numbers didn't come up as well, but John Carlson? Give me a break...

Now we just have to find some major diamonds to shore up both lines.
itvnetop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:13 PM   #603
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Now that's a f'ing draft. I must give Danny boy and Vinny C some props. We got 1st round caliber players for second round picks. Seriously, the Skins have indemnified themselves from drafting a bust (all 3 can't be a bust). All offensive bases are covered except in the OL which I'm sure is going to get addressed in the later rounds. Now all we need is a saftly in the 3rd round or maybe pickup one up through free agency or trade.

Defensivly I am concerned but hopefully it'll be alright with a loaded offense.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:14 PM   #604
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,331
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

This is very much like when we got ARE and Lloyd...we needed just one good receiver, but we got two instead. Why does our team overreact? Portis goes down, and you give up the 4th for TJ Duckett....ugh. Well I hope we can find some hidden gems in the later rounds. I wonder how Moss and Cooley are feeling right now.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:15 PM   #605
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

the only thing I can figure is that the front office was nervous about their luck with picking wideouts in recent years, so they figure they increase their odds by taking two.

I wouldn't be surprised if this means the unthinkable for either Moss or Randle El.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:16 PM   #606
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beemnseven View Post
There's something in the Redskin Rulebook about drafting D-linemen early. We should all know that by now.

I don't get this at all. I felt the need was more along the O-line -- it's still good, but aging. It's the most important group of players on a football team, and this organization appears to be content with milking the current guys for all they're worth without preparing for their inevitable decline.

Or they really didn't like any of the O-linemen at this juncture.
Typically O-Linemen can be found in some of the later rounds - outside of LT - plus 8 guys went in the 1st and some more in the 2nd so I can see skipping on that position. Skipping on Campbell for Fred Davis especially is what surprises me.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:16 PM   #607
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheriff Gonna Getcha View Post
This has Snyder's prints all over it. Snyder is definitely an "offense-centric" guy and loves the guys at the skills positions. Frankly, I'm shocked we have not addressed CB, DT, DE, OT, or OG yet. Yes, we have picks in the 3rd, 4th, 6th, and 7th, but I'm stunned we've only drafted guys on O.
Well it's a major shift from the early focus on defense in previoius years

Rumors of a Randle El trade by the way, don't know how legit the rumor is right now though. I think there are serious cap implications if we do
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:18 PM   #608
Beemnseven
Pro Bowl
 
Beemnseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
This is very much like when we got ARE and Lloyd...we needed just one good receiver, but we got two instead. Why does our team overreact? Portis goes down, and you give up the 4th for TJ Duckett....ugh. Well I hope we can find some hidden gems in the later rounds. I wonder how Moss and Cooley are feeling right now.
A 3rd and a 4th.
Beemnseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:19 PM   #609
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,464
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

JC is certainly going to have weapons next year. The message I'm getting is clear, this offense is open for business.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:19 PM   #610
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 42
Posts: 5,454
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by EXoffender View Post
But Campbell was still on the board...
yea i would have preffered Thomas, campbell, then kelly...

time to watch the press conference to see what was going through their heads
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:19 PM   #611
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,165
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Thrash and Mix are done but I think we will keep Mathis for KR and Depth
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:19 PM   #612
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

Cerrato is an idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What are we going to run the run and shoot???????
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:20 PM   #613
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

I just dont understand how we dont get Campbell or Groves where we were drafting in the 2nd round....that absolutley boggles my mind...two wide receivers and a tight end?? Just really dosent make a whole lot of sense to me
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:21 PM   #614
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,165
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

It wouldnt be the Warpath without a Madden reference so I now have two WR's to develop in Madden yay! I don't have to draft a WR in Madden for like 5 years LOL there you go.
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:21 PM   #615
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 61
Posts: 10,401
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread

I don't mind picking two receivers, I have seen it work in the past. Yes, D-Line could have been addressed (and should have rather than Davis - IMO). But two good receivers seems to me to be good when that was an area we were really deficient in.

We will get a D-Line guy in the 3rd and O-line depth in the 5-7th.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.32813 seconds with 13 queries