|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-13-2007, 06:30 PM | #16 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
They said Campbell wasn't a first rounder and he's going to end up being the best QB in this division by 2008.
Unless he gets hurt, then I'm just getting ahead of myself.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
Advertisements |
04-13-2007, 06:59 PM | #17 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
assuming we cant trade out of #6...
would u rather take a guy who might have more potential than carriker but doesnt fit our system? or would u rather reach for carriker, who fits our system. carriker, branch, and okoye would be the 3 best fits imo, followed by anderson.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
04-13-2007, 07:51 PM | #18 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Quote:
|
|
04-13-2007, 08:00 PM | #19 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Jarvis Moss, Justin Harrell, Justin Blalock, and CJ Gaddis. Can we make that work
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
04-13-2007, 08:00 PM | #20 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
04-13-2007, 08:23 PM | #21 |
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
i thought okoye's strength was stopping the run? hes only 19, he will add weight as he gets older
from nfldraftcountdown Strengths: Extremely strong...A solid athlete with good measurables...Stout against the run and is able to take on multiple blockers...Gets a good push and will collapse the pocket...Is able to shed blocks and clog up the middle...Shows great instincts for the game and is still developing...Smart player who is mature beyond his years and wants to improve...Quick and will penetrate and rush the passer...Still has a ton of potential and he could really be physically molded by a pro strength coach.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
04-13-2007, 08:30 PM | #22 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
no, but i also believe that our drafting should impact our immediate needs, if you are always looking to the future, you will never succeed in the present. If we start building for a future team, then we are just throwing this season away.
|
04-13-2007, 08:32 PM | #23 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 331
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Quote:
|
|
04-13-2007, 09:27 PM | #24 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Quote:
It seems that a team would be much better off going to get a vet to fill immediate holes. I mean, if you end up getting a historically great player, then playing him at 50% of what he will be wont hurt your team. But historically great players are impossible to predict, and don't occur very often. If we had built in the past, we would be succeeding now. You can't pick a guy who is going to help the team now, you just can't. Almost certainly anyone we pick will be no better than the guy we already have at the position as a rookie. So we have to look at our future needs. We can't pass on a great player like Okoye because a guy who won't be here in two years doesn't compliment him well. See what I'm saying?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
04-15-2007, 01:53 AM | #25 |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
I much rather draft Jamaal Anderson over Adam Carriker, I think Carriker fits more in a 3-4 defensive scheme.
|
04-15-2007, 02:51 AM | #26 |
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Actually, the more I think about it, if we end up staying at #6 I could see us drafting Jamaal Anderson. Since Carter is a lighter, speed rusher who doesn't really specialize in run-stopping, Anderson would compliment him nicely. He's 6-6 290 and ran a 4.75 at the combine. That's the size that can be very effective against the run, and that's the great speed it takes to be a good pass rusher. And from the highlights I've seen and the scouting reports I've read, he's really quick off the edge.
__________________
Tardy |
04-15-2007, 04:34 AM | #27 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Quote:
I like that Smooty, I believe that would be a nice draft for us, getting both Moss and Blalock will defiently take some keen manuvering by our front office, but I don't think they have the savvy to do so, but I like where your going with it. |
|
04-15-2007, 04:38 AM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Agreed, but he looks like he may be the strongest of the defensive lineman, the benefit for taking AC would be that we could trade down and help other areas, there probably is not that much of a drop off between him and Okoye, he would fit nice on the strong side.
|
04-15-2007, 04:54 PM | #29 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
Carriker has character though. And that will increase his value. He's better than Daniels is now that's for sure. If Blache is happy with Golston, Griffin, and Montgomery (6'5" 300lbs), Carriker fits the bill. So does Jamaal Anderson. We need to aquire another first day selection since we do not have a lot of success scouting and/or developing late rounders so, trading down seems likely. Who's going to fall into our lap is the real question. What moves will the FO have to make to get the guy they need. Look at the position we were in last year when we seemingly almost lost out on drafting McIntosh (and they were others LBs we had rated above him). Branch, Okoye, Anderson, Adams, Harrell and Carriker are said to be future NFL stars but, which of these guys falls to 31st overall barring a trade with CHI (I used the briggs trade only because it's the likely team with a late round pick willing to trade, therefore the 'worst case scenario')?
|
04-15-2007, 04:58 PM | #30 |
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,046
|
Re: Carriker very good fit
We'll have to trade down from 6th overall and trade away our next year's first rounder to get Harrell, Moss, and Blalock or any two top 10 DL (take your choice) and a top 5 OL. FO doesn't hesitate to deal away future picks. That's why we're in the position we're in. Imagine having the 6th overall pick and the 38th overall pick (which we traded) this year. Who would we be drooling over now?
|
|
|