![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,439
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
No he's not. True shutdown corners like Champ would get a lot more than $24 million up front.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
Advertisements |
![]() |
#17 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Our 2006 signing bonuses are looking pretty puny right now.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,439
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Quote:
When we see what Adalius Thomas gets, we're going to feel pretty good about what we're paying Andre Carter.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Speaking of Thomas, I haven't really heard his named mentioned in any of these reports today. What's going on with him?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Quote:
The thing with Thomas, I think that most teams don't know whether to give him DE money or LB money because he's a hybrid sort. He's a good linebacker and he's a good pass rusher off the edges as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Right, but what I meant (I should have been more clear) was has he gone to meet with any teams yet? Over the past week ESPN made it seem like he's be in San Fran right away but I haven't heard a thing about it yet.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Oh, okay...you're right. I haven't heard much.
You know, it would be very interesting to see if the Cowboys show some interest in this guy as well as the Giants. Either could be a good fit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Yeah, that's the sort of thing that I don't want to happen. Then again, if it did, hopefully we would only have to deal with him for 2-3 seasons because he its getting up there in age.
EDIT: Nevermind, he's younger than I thought
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude Last edited by ArtMonkDrillz; 03-02-2007 at 01:46 PM. Reason: I checked |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Quote:
Just some rumors around the office
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Thanks, I must have missed that line. Stupid lexdysia.
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 43
Posts: 241
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Any news on Smoot yet?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
ill tell you what. with all the bitching and moaning that goes on around here, how come no one ever praises our capologist? those puny 5 million dollar signing bonus', along with the 5 year contracts look like bargain basement prices right now. kudos to our front office
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 62
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
As to Thomas, I think someone is going to seriously overpay for this guy. He's been around for a while and it was only this year that he came up big. Don't get me wrong, I think the guy has talent BUT I also think that Baltimore's D Coordinator (Rex "son of buddy" Ryan) was very creative in their use of him.
He is not a plug-and-play guy. He needs a scheme that lets him have a lot of options in how to play. You stick him in as a traditional LB or DE, he is nothing special (Baltimore did both of those things - he was good but not superstar good). With that said, a creative D-coordinator could have a lot of fun with this guy. If I was him, I would've been headed to Boston so fast it would have made your head spin. If the Pats were anywhere close in terms of money - I would have accepted less to play on Belichecks D. Completely off topic - With salaries and SB's so high, you would think a few of these players would think quality of life issues in making their decisions. I mean, really, how much money do you need? If its between signing with a loser for 20M and a winner for 15M - I go with the winner every time. But hey, that's just me. Since it is unlikely I will ever be confronted with two such offers, I am fairly certain I shall never have to face such a dilemma.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Rumor: Nate Clements to 49ers.
Laying 5mil on the table is a pretty serious decison. Don't let the difference between 20 and 15 being 5 fool you. The part that is important is the MILLION. 5 is not a lot. 5,000,000 is a huge amount.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|