|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-17-2007, 11:03 PM | #16 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: va
Age: 57
Posts: 890
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
if i need a wr to make a game winning catch it would be monk. Clark as good as he was alway dropped to many passes. Monk rarely drop any. The one that Monk drop that stays in my mind was the Monday night game against the rams when williams was the QB in 87. I cant think of any other ones that he drop. Clark drop a hell alot more but still was a great WR.
|
Advertisements |
02-18-2007, 12:25 PM | #17 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 559
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
You know what gets me is that someone like Monk can't just go out week after week and help his team sustain drives by moving the chains and just catching everything that was thrown to him. Oh and by the way help his team win some Super Bowls and at the time when he played break a freak'in record for receptions. Doing this with EXTREME class and honor to the franchise. Something that the "play maker" would know nothing about. All of those people who are unworthy of casting a hall of fame vote for Monk can just eat a dick! Thanks Mr. Monk for the great memories and all that you did for our beloved team.
|
02-18-2007, 04:58 PM | #18 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
What about #66, #68, #79 (that was Lachey's number right)? Or are you talking only about wide receivers?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
02-18-2007, 05:30 PM | #19 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 50
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
Well, in a perfect world lots of Redskins from the glory years would be in the Hall. Joe Jacoby and Russ Grimm should be in.
Jim Lachey I'm not so sure about. He was easily among the top 2 or 3 left tackles in the game when he played, but the longetivity wasn't really there with him. It's hard enough for O-linemen to get in -- since there aren't any real stats to go by, they had to have played solidly for 10+ years. If I were dictator of the Hall of Fame, the following would be shoe-ins: Art Monk Gary Clark Darrell Green Joe Theismann Jacoby Grimm Bostic Monte Coleman Don Warren Dave Butz Dexter Manley Mark Mosley Close, but not quite: Ricky Sanders (very, very close - in fact, someone could convince me) Jim Lachey Mark May Neal Olkewicz Alvin Walton Charles Mann Earnest Byner Clint Didier |
02-19-2007, 05:52 AM | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
Quote:
Talk about hypocrisy! Every statement either of them make applies to Harry Carson who they couldn't stick thier heads up his A** far enough, who was the best LB on the those Giant team's? Taylor! Who did we consider the biggest priority to stop on either side of the ball when we played the Giant's? Taylor! Not only wasen't he the best LB you could make a case that the Giants never missed a beat defensivly when Carson retired and Pepper Johnson stepped in, and yes he played in a 3-4 set. They can talk all they want about why they want to keep Monk out, but by sheer numbers regardless of any signature catch, or who was the best WR on the team in a given year, makes Monk an absolute no brainer! |
|
02-20-2007, 02:56 AM | #21 | |
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Posts: 322
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
I can't remember a single "signature catch" for Harry Carson. ;-)
More to the point, one of the most convincing reasons that Monk should be in the HOF is that there is no fan asking for Clark to enter before Monk. Clark was extremely high in the list of career receptions and yardage when he retired (does someone know how to get this data?) and he has "sexy" (i.e. home-run) catches, yet almost all Redskins fans feel that Monk should be in the HOF before Clark. In addition, Monk's 106 catches in 1984 was 11 more than any other receiver in the time period from 1964 to 1989 (and the record at the time). The first time an AFC player got more than 106 catches was 1999! As an additional aside, Monk helped Clark's stats, but Clark hurt Monk's stats. Monk kept on getting the first downs, allowing more long shots to Clark. But Clark took away a lot of the big receptions that Monk otherwise would have gotten. Maybe if we retire his number...? Quote:
|
|
02-20-2007, 10:43 AM | #22 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,265
|
Re: Was Gary Clark our Best WR from 85-92?
Quote:
|
|
|
|