This will fire everybody up ...

cpayne5 · 07-11-2006, 09:20 PM

File it away and ignore it.

53 men take the field September 11 wearing burgundy and gold; that's when the real discussion begins.

MightyJoeGibbs · 07-11-2006, 09:25 PM

YEAH, YEAH SUCKAS, holla @ us season time boiyyyyyyyyy. But its 54 guys in burgundy and gold, although wut about the white? , I will make a curtain call for real. LOL. Look for me, Ill be the guy smoot cant cover.

70Chip · 07-11-2006, 10:31 PM

10 wins and 2 losses in conference is a solid playoff team to me.

It matters not what these people think. The only way you can say the Redskins D is smoke and mirrors is if you haven't seen them play more than a couple of games in the last two years, which is probably the case here. In 34 games under Williams the defense has been OUTSTANDING in 29 or 30 of those. I'd say they were at least good enough to win in 33 of the 34, the one egg was in New York last year. You can't do that with gimmicks.

I think experts like this will have to quickly re-evaluate once the obvious becomes... obvious.

81forHOF · 07-12-2006, 12:09 AM

If we have so little defensive talent then why do other teams keep cherrypicking our players every off season? (Pierce, Smoot, Arrington, Clark, etc...)

Longtimefan · 07-12-2006, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

They really weren't a playoff team??

That doesn't even deserve a response.

Once again we're wasting valuable time responding to some redskin critic who obviously dislikes the team. They're everywhere all the time and I just consider it a complete waste to continue responding to them.

dblanch66 · 07-12-2006, 12:27 AM

If the Redskins "weren't really a playoff team", then what about the vaGiants? Didn't they get goose-egged at home?

hooskins · 07-12-2006, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Longtimefan

Once again we're wasting valuable time responding to some redskin critic who obviously dislikes the team. They're everywhere all the time and I just consider it a complete waste to continue responding to them.

I think it isn't, I think its great because I will remember these moments when we make the playoffs again. And I can't wait for the shit we will get next year, and I can't wait to prove em' wrong again. I like reading and responding to these articles, keep them coming I am gald no one gives us props more fuel for the fire.

SmootSmack · 07-12-2006, 12:48 AM

Saunders and Gibbs' offenses are hardly different. They're from the same coaching tree aren't they?

As for taking two years to fire up Saunders' offense, well even though technically he was the WR coach in St. Louis for all intents and purposes he co-ran that offense with Vermeil. And let's see, how did he do his first year in St. Louis? Oh yeah, #1 offense in the league, Rams finish 13-3 and win the Super Bowl.

hooskins · 07-12-2006, 01:01 AM

I think this guy who wrote this, went with little facts, and the age old Skin's hate trail. All points mentioned above were good. Saunders did well in KC his first year, just their D sucked. With the Rams, they were ranked #1, and Saunders has been known to take low profile recievers and make them produce and significantly add to the offense. Let's see, the Skins already have a good D and we have a good reciever in Moss, and let's assume for all intents and purposes of this arguement, AR-E and Lloyd are bad recievers; doesn't that basically mean with Saunders we have all parts of the equation to succeed? If this writer is trying to facts about Saunders and our recievers, his exact points actually disprove his "theory".

bigSkinsfan61 · 07-12-2006, 04:15 AM

the offense is different and its complex i hear what hes sayin but we'll see about his prediction i say 11-5 lol

Hog1 · 07-12-2006, 06:22 AM

Actually, I must admit, I am quite impressed by the author of the quote. I had no idea a Giant fan knew enough words to "make" a paragraph

FRPLG · 07-12-2006, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

They really weren't a playoff team??

That doesn't even deserve a response.

Nail on the head right there.

I hate how every year in the NFL there are teams who are in the playofss but aren't really IN the playoffs. That bugs me.

What a crock of crap that statment is.

Monkeydad · 07-12-2006, 12:23 PM

Nah, it's not worth my time.

Giantone · 07-12-2006, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

Actually, I must admit, I am quite impressed by the author of the quote. I had no idea a Giant fan knew enough words to "make" a paragraph

Just wait till we grad ge ate the 8th grade ,

Hog1 · 07-12-2006, 05:36 PM

just a little tasteless humor. I guess you knew the job was dangerous when you took it Giantone?

07-11-2006, 09:20 PM	#31
cpayne5 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 3,807	Re: This will fire everybody up ... File it away and ignore it. 53 men take the field September 11 wearing burgundy and gold; that's when the real discussion begins. __________________ "It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."

07-11-2006, 09:25 PM	#32
MightyJoeGibbs The Starter Join Date: May 2006 Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community Age: 45 Posts: 1,087	Re: This will fire everybody up ... YEAH, YEAH SUCKAS, holla @ us season time boiyyyyyyyyy. But its 54 guys in burgundy and gold, although wut about the white? , I will make a curtain call for real. LOL. Look for me, Ill be the guy smoot cant cover. __________________ Maybe in order to understand mankind we have to look at that word itself. MANKIND. Basically, it's made up of two separate words "mank"and "ind." What do these words mean? It's a mystery and that's why so is mankind. --Jack Handy Deep Thoughts

07-11-2006, 10:31 PM	#33
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 53 Posts: 3,048	Re: This will fire everybody up ... 10 wins and 2 losses in conference is a solid playoff team to me. It matters not what these people think. The only way you can say the Redskins D is smoke and mirrors is if you haven't seen them play more than a couple of games in the last two years, which is probably the case here. In 34 games under Williams the defense has been OUTSTANDING in 29 or 30 of those. I'd say they were at least good enough to win in 33 of the 34, the one egg was in New York last year. You can't do that with gimmicks. I think experts like this will have to quickly re-evaluate once the obvious becomes... obvious. __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

07-12-2006, 12:09 AM	#34
81forHOF Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Mt Holly Springs, PA Age: 52 Posts: 579	Re: This will fire everybody up ... If we have so little defensive talent then why do other teams keep cherrypicking our players every off season? (Pierce, Smoot, Arrington, Clark, etc...) __________________ 81 is where he belongs!

07-12-2006, 12:27 AM	#36
dblanch66 The Starter Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Phoenix, AZ Age: 58 Posts: 1,176	Re: This will fire everybody up ... If the Redskins "weren't really a playoff team", then what about the vaGiants? Didn't they get goose-egged at home?

07-12-2006, 12:48 AM	#38
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: This will fire everybody up ... Saunders and Gibbs' offenses are hardly different. They're from the same coaching tree aren't they? As for taking two years to fire up Saunders' offense, well even though technically he was the WR coach in St. Louis for all intents and purposes he co-ran that offense with Vermeil. And let's see, how did he do his first year in St. Louis? Oh yeah, #1 offense in the league, Rams finish 13-3 and win the Super Bowl. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

07-12-2006, 01:01 AM	#39
hooskins Most Interesting Man in the World Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Chantilly, VA Age: 37 Posts: 8,606	Re: This will fire everybody up ... I think this guy who wrote this, went with little facts, and the age old Skin's hate trail. All points mentioned above were good. Saunders did well in KC his first year, just their D sucked. With the Rams, they were ranked #1, and Saunders has been known to take low profile recievers and make them produce and significantly add to the offense. Let's see, the Skins already have a good D and we have a good reciever in Moss, and let's assume for all intents and purposes of this arguement, AR-E and Lloyd are bad recievers; doesn't that basically mean with Saunders we have all parts of the equation to succeed? If this writer is trying to facts about Saunders and our recievers, his exact points actually disprove his "theory". __________________ Vacancy

07-12-2006, 04:15 AM	#40
bigSkinsfan61 Special Teams Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: richmond va Age: 63 Posts: 252	Re: This will fire everybody up ... the offense is different and its complex i hear what hes sayin but we'll see about his prediction i say 11-5 lol

07-12-2006, 06:22 AM	#41
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: This will fire everybody up ... Actually, I must admit, I am quite impressed by the author of the quote. I had no idea a Giant fan knew enough words to "make" a paragraph __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

07-12-2006, 12:23 PM	#43
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 45 Posts: 17,460	Re: This will fire everybody up ... Nah, it's not worth my time.

07-12-2006, 05:36 PM	#45
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: This will fire everybody up ... just a little tasteless humor. I guess you knew the job was dangerous when you took it Giantone? __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

This will fire everybody up ...

Locker Room Main Forum